Bug#613170: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: OpenVZ-specific NFS implementation error

2011-02-13 Thread Stanislav Klinkov
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-30 Severity: important Tags: patch See OpenVZ bugzilla for details: http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1626 Patch #1: http://1626.bugzilla.openvz.org/attachment.cgi?id=1376 Patch #2: http://1626.bugzilla.openvz.org/attachment.cgi?id=1377 Please, includ

Bug#612911: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: Deprecated CIFS module

2011-02-11 Thread Stanislav Klinkov
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-30 Severity: important The package "linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64" is shipped with a deprecated version of the CIFS module ("cifs.ko"). So, userspace utilities such as "mount.cifs" become incompatible with old version of cifs.ko and refuse to work. For exam

Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS

2011-02-10 Thread Stanislav Klinkov
10.02.2011 16:41, maximilian attems wrote: > hmm, other testers do not agree with your assessement, see d-kernel > mailinglist. > My assessment concerns only some of kernel features (specifically NFS implementation in VEs), not the whole kernel itself. But these features are very important, and dis

Re: 2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS

2011-02-09 Thread Stanislav Klinkov
broken, bug #1626 is still present. Furthemore, this pre-release contains extremely buggy NFS support (that bugs are already fixed in "042test006.1" too). I see no reason to put this package in new minor squeeze release, because the new one is worse than the present one. Respectful, Stani

2.6.32-5-openvz: Broken CIFS

2011-02-09 Thread Stanislav Klinkov
be very nice to have a revised kernel version in the distributive. And another wish. The 2.6.32.5-openvz is not stable enough yet. May be, does it make sense to include 2.6.26-openvz kernel into "Squeeze" as an option? Thank you for your job. With best regards, Stanislav Klinko