reassign 1078591 e2fsprogs
thanks
El 13/8/24 a las 9:11, Giuseppe Sacco escribió:
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.10.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
this is a debian testing machine. After today upgrade and reboot, the machine
does not start anymore.
reassign 1000905 src:linux
retitle 1000905 Internal laptop keyboard not recognized and not working
thanks
Hi. I'm reassigning this bug (using bcc) because it was filed against
base-files but it's more a bug in Linux.
Thanks.
Package: linux-image-4.19.0-5-cloud-amd64
Version: 4.19.37-5
Dear maintainer:
On a virtual machine running buster on Google Compute Engine, where
this kernel package is the default, I get the following messages:
google_clock_skew_daemon[1539]: hwclock: Cannot access the Hardware Clock via
any k
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.16.12-1
Severity: serious
Hello Ben.
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" and it
failed in this way:
[...]
/bin/sh: 1: bison: not found
scripts/Makefile.lib:217: recipe for target 'scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c' failed
make[5]: *** [scripts/kconfi
reassign 883980 chromium,linux
thanks
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 05:45:33PM -0600, Hanlyu Sarang wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 9.9+deb9u3
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I upgraded to Debian 9.3 today, using aptitude update/aptitude upgrade, then
> rebooted the computer. Ev
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 06:23:27PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 18:05 +0000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:04:50PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I intend to upload linux version 4.9.2-1 to unstable tomorrow
> > > (We
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:04:50PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux version 4.9.2-1 to unstable tomorrow
> (Wednesday). As this is a new upstream version, there is of course an
> ABI bump.
Hi.
(Sorry if this is already reported, last time I looked at the bug page
I didn't f
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:04:50PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I intend to upload linux version 4.9.2-1 to unstable tomorrow
> (Wednesday). As this is a new upstream version, there is of course an
> ABI bump.
Hi.
(Sorry if this is already reported, last time I looked at the bug page it was
no
Hi.
The following workaround worked for me:
Try setting the CPU type to be a "simple old CPU" without a lot of
features. For example, the following change fixed the problem in my
case:
--- a/libvirt/qemu/machine.xml
+++ b/libvirt/qemu/machine.xml
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ or other application using the
forcemerge 833016 841007
thanks
Hi.
You will see that both bugs belong to the "src:linux" package,
so it's better not to file duplicates. To tell the BTS that
a certain version has the bug, we have a "found" command.
I'm merging the bugs with this message.
BTW: There is a 4.9-rc version in expe
I can reproduce this as well.
Also running a stretch VM on a jessie KVM/qemu/libvirt host.
My KVM host is a i5-6400 running linux 3.16.36-1+deb8u2.
Thanks.
Package: src:numix-icon-theme
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build "numix-icon-theme" in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
+---
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 04:33:58PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > You can use the command ischroot from the debianutils package.
>
> Why would I want to add a dependency on that? [...]
You really wouldn't, because debianutils is essential.
severity 825423 important
thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> this seems to suggest that you are not using a throw-away chroot but
> a persistent one. Could you provide details about your chroot setup?
> Are you not using schroot?
I am using schroot. This i
Package: src:linux,src:supermin,src:sbuild
Severity: serious
Justification: Breaks other packages
X-Debbugs-Cc: sanv...@debian.org
Dear maintainers:
I think this is a bug in linux, but I'm not 100% sure.
Please do agree with the other maintainers on which package is to blame.
I'm building packa
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:41:09PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Yes, you must do that. Your custom kernel configuration should be
> > > based on the appropriate file provided in linux-source-4.5. These have
> > > the CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL, CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY and
> > > CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTE
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 08:51:25PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> You wrote:
> [...]
> > Should I remove CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYS from .config before building
> > the kernel? I hope not.
> [...]
>
> Yes, you must do that. Your custom kernel configuration should be
> based on the ap
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.5.2-1
Dear maintainer:
I merged the output of "lsmod" in two different virtual machines
running stretch/sid to create a minimal kernel which works on both.
The combined file is attached as "lsmod.txt".
Then I created a .config file by executing this script:
#!/bi
Package: src:linux-tools
Version: 4.2-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64
Version: 3.16.7-ckt9-3~deb8u1
Severity: important
Note: I'm not sure which package to blame here. I chose the kernel
because I believe the kernel knows better than anybody else which
modules are suitable to be unloaded and which modules are not, but
this could a
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.116
When I install dracut, a new initrd is generated automatically using dracut.
If I install initramfs-tools again, dracut is removed but this time a
new initrd (generated by initramfs-tools) is not generated.
I see a lot of danger here.
Either initrds are g
severity 494374 serious
tags 494374 + upstream
tags 494374 + patch
thanks
While we are at it, I consider this bug important enough to delay the
release of lenny until it's fixed.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
There is now a patch available here:
The patch comes from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11242
which I'm attaching to this report.
My machine (Mac Mini powerpc with USB keyboard) had the same problem
and the patch fixes it.From 252b7805384d12c6857b8bebf1a373e327afbec9 Mon Sep 17 00:0
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 04:19:24PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 version 2.6.18.dfsg.1-22etch2 works ok
> > linux-image-2.6.20-1-686 version 2.6.20-3 does not work
> > linux-image-2.6.26
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> reassign 498645 linux-2.6
> stop
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > > this looks more like a kernel bug,
> >
>
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> this looks more like a kernel bug,
One detail I've just noticed: After the boot, the eject button of /dev/hdc
does not work at all. This didn't happen with etch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> > To summarize: No matter how faulty my hardware might be (the boot
> > never took so long with etch), I don't think it is reasonable at all
> > that a user has to do this in order for the boot process not to take
> > more than three minutes.
> >
>
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92i
After installing a lenny system today, it happened that the boot
process takes more than 3 minutes to finish. Needless to say, I first
believed it was frozen and didn't work at all. I was lucky to discover
(by accident) that it was a very long waiting time i
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-k7
Version: 2.6.18-6
I have a system here which shows this message when booting:
kobject_add failed for audio with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with
the same name in the same directory.
[] kobject_add+0x146/0x16c
[] class_device_add+0x9d/0x3b2
[] kobject
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> We really need a better way to handle bug reports which affect more than one
> package, since cloning and merging is not the best way to go for those.
In the past, the BTS allowed things like this:
Package: foo, bar
I'm not sure if this is still support
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Sven Luther wrote:
> [ snipped paragraph about Manoj ]
Quoting Julian Gilbey in the logs for this bug:
> According to Manoj in the logs to bug#394661, which was blocking this
> bug and has since been closed, the bug was fixed in kernel-package
> 10.063. So I guess that all
Same problem here:
mac:~# apt-get install linux-image-2.6-powerpc
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
linux-image-2.6-powerpc is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of
severity 266538 serious
thanks
Same here. My system:
:00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2) (prog-if 8a
[Master SecP PriP])
Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology: Unknown device 5002
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0
I/O ports at f000
33 matches
Mail list logo
