On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:39:49 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 14:26 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:20:03 -0500, "John W. Linville"
> > wrote:
> > We really want to indicate "
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:20:03 -0500, "John W. Linville"
wrote:
> In some cases, it might be desirable to package a module from an
> external source tree alongside the base kernel. In those cases, it
> might also be desirable to not have those modules tainting the kernel.
>
> This patch provides
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:30:58 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We do want to allow lock debugging for GPL-compatible modules that are
> not (yet) built in-tree. This was disabled as a side-effect of commit
> 2449b8ba0745327c5fa49a8d9acffe03b2eded69 ('module,bug: Add
> TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for module
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 03:59:33 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Dynamic debugging is currently disabled for tainted modules, except
> for TAINT_CRAP. This prevents use of dynamic debugging for
> out-of-tree modules now that they are also tainted.
>
> This condition was apparently intended to avoid a
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:44:17 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 12:29 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:38:14 +0100, Ben Hutchings
> > wrote:
> > > Dynamic debugging was enabled for GPL-compat
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:38:14 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Dynamic debugging was enabled for GPL-compatible out-of-tree modules
> until my addition of TAINT_OOT_MODULE. It should continue to be
> enabled now.
Please just remove the test entirely.
AFAICT there's nothing unique to dynamic debug w
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:55:28 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:41:37AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > I think we need a "taint_string()" function, and instead of lockdep
> > disabling itself it should note the taint string in its reports.
>
the taint flags in all
> lockdep and rtmutex-debug error messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
Acked-by: Rusty Russell
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:08:34 -0400, Nick Bowler
wrote:
> On 2011-10-25 22:54 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:17:24PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:04:55PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0400, Nick Bowl
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:17:24 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> commit 7816c45bf13255157c00fb8aca86cb64d825e878
> Author: Roland Vossen
> Date: Thu Apr 7 11:20:58 2011 +0200
>
> modules: Enabled dynamic debugging for staging modules
...
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland Vossen
> Acked-by: Ja
te: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:12:28 +0200
Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code
any good. We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this
should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very
little review.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
R
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 19:48 +0100, Pozsar Balazs wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:31:04PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > I've got these messages several times on the experimental SUSE too,
> > but can't reproduce it so far, even without Rusty's patch to modprobe
> > they have disappeared. See her
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 19:53 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 29, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please send complete log.
> Here it is. I can reproduce the bug even with a script like:
>
> while read m; do
> /sbin/modprobe.real $m &
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 15:08 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 28, Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The latter is the simplest option. Please try this patch (it will be in
> > the next release, too). If it seems to work, please ack.
> No luck.
Pl
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:10 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> And then it fails for ehci-hcd too (which is not loaded at all).
> Rusty, do you have other ideas for debugging?
I have reread the bug reports, and meditated on this issue some more.
This is a possibility I was aware of when I changed to cod
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 15:38 +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1.
> >
> > I do not understand how this can hap
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 23:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Any comments?
Martin Wilck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0. the module loading tool runs during boot with PID 1.
I do not understand how this can happen. request_module() cannot occur
until usermodehelper_init() is called. This is only don
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 16:26 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > What do you think about this? It happens when udevd tries to load a
> > dozen of modules at boot time. Is there a race in modules loading?
> > It happens less frequently with ot
ind someone actually uses that odd "turn option
into env var" stuff.
Name: Restore quotes around environment variables
Status: Tested on 2.6.9-rc2-bk13
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As noticed by Joey Hess (and thanks for Christoph for forwarding it):
if we deci
19 matches
Mail list logo
