On 15/02/2011 16:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the linux-2.6 package:
#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod: Unknown relocation:
36
It has been closed by Ben Hutchings.
Tested o
On 21/01/2011 22:50, Richard Mortimer wrote:
On 21/01/2011 20:40, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Richard Mortimer (ri...@oldelvet.org.uk) wrote:
Thanks for the info! At first glance, it does not seem to contradict my
findings. When you find time, can you have a try at v3 I just posted ?
I&#
On 21/01/2011 20:40, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Richard Mortimer (ri...@oldelvet.org.uk) wrote:
[...]
P.S. I saw your followup mail so hopefully this matches what you have found!
Thanks for the info! At first glance, it does not seem to contradict my
findings. When you find time, can you
On 21/01/2011 18:52, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Richard Mortimer (ri...@oldelvet.org.uk) wrote:
...
I'm also getting a lot of Kernel unaligned access errors from the
kernel. I don't know if they are related to this or not and this is the
first time that I personally have got 2.6.37
On 21/01/2011 00:04, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* David Miller (da...@davemloft.net) wrote:
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:33:39 -0500
So I guess we go for the following. Is it verbose enough ?
It's got all of the details that seem to matter, thanks.
I'm letting people f
On 18/01/2011 06:08, David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:00:39 -0800 (PST)
ftrace: Remove unnecessary alignment tag from ftrace_event_call.
It's completely unnecessary and causes problems on platforms
where this tag down-aligns the structure's alignment.
Signed-
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:52 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
>
> On 18/01/2011 06:50, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >> So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequence
On 18/01/2011 06:50, David Miller wrote:
From: David Miller
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:37:09 -0800 (PST)
So we do end up seeing the R_SPARC_LO10 + R_SPARC_13 sequences in the
final module object.
Therefore, we really should handle R_SPARC_13 in the sparc module loader.
Ok, I now feel like I
On 18/01/2011 00:37, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:34:03 +
I guess that points towards the binutils linker not doing the correct
thing.
Ok, it is in fact doing the correct thing.
I'm really surprised we never hit this before in all of these
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 13:02 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Richard Mortimer
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:46:21 +
>
> > As an example from drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c function scsi_eh_wakeup().
> >
> > This has relocation records of
> ...
>
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:22 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 22:07 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller
> > Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:17:22 -0800 (PST)
>
> > > I think the problem we have here is that the _ftrace_events section is
>
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 22:07 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:17:22 -0800 (PST)
> > I think the problem we have here is that the _ftrace_events section is
> > not aligned sufficiently. That ".align 4" mnemonic is a good indication
> > of this. It should
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 21:17 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Richard Mortimer
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:08:30 +
>
> [ Frederic, Steven, Ingo, the short version of the story is that we
> need to make it such that the _ftrace_events section is aligned
> properly for 6
Hi,
On 15/01/2011 10:00, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:38:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer
So that means that the kernel is complaining about type 54 which is
R_SPARC_UA64. That matches with the objdump output which doesn't list
R_SPARC_LM2
002bf4 R_SPARC_13*ABS*+0x0020
2be0: 03 00 00 00 sethi %hi(0), %g1
2be4: c4 00 60 00 ld [ %g1 ], %g2
sethi %hi(__tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup), %g1
lduw[%g1+%lo(__tracepoint_scsi_eh_wakeup)+8], %g2
Regards
Richard
On
On 13/01/2011 23:57, David Miller wrote:
From: Richard Mortimer
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:34:01 +
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:37 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:27 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
On 09/01/2011 03:46, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:37 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:27 +0000, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> >
> > On 09/01/2011 03:46, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Ben Hutchings
> > > Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:00:40 +
> > >
> &g
On 09/01/2011 03:46, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:00:40 +
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 01:05 +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Boot of linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64 fails to find the
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Boot of linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64 fails to find the disks and drops
to the initramfs prompt. When I try to load the sym53c8xx driver it fails
as follows
(initramfs) modprobe sym53c8xx
[ 122.470284] module scsi_mod: Unkno
e kernel is fully initialised.
Richard
--
Richard Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-sparc64
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-9
Severity: normal
I am seeing repeated "Kernel unaligned access" messages on a Sun Netra X1
machine. These typically happen in blocks of 5 every 6 seconds or so. The
pattern is not totally regular an sometime 20 or 30 second may pass wi
Hi,
The attached patch has been tested with the sources for 2.6.18-7 and
fixes the problem for me. This patch has been passed on upstream and
Jurij is aware of it.
Richard
--
Richard Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From b5530bfb19f6dc678c0be88f2071ba79e92b9d3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-sparc64
Version: 2.6.18-8
Severity: important
The Debian 2.6.18 kernel images do not boot on my Netra X1 machine. The
same machine boots with Debian 2.6.17. I have not tried any kernel.org
versions on this machine.
I get the following Oops
boot: Linux -p
Allocated 8
On Sat, 2006-12-16 at 11:30 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:13:53PM +0000, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> > Hi Jurij,
> >
> > Did you get around to building the mini-iso image? I'm happy to test
> > when you have it ready.
>
> Hi Richard,
Hi Jurij,
Did you get around to building the mini-iso image? I'm happy to test
when you have it ready.
Regards
Richard
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 15:48 -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:58:18PM +, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> You are right t
8:00:20:F8:35:85, IRQ 7475200.
...
Thus for your patch to work the tulip and dmfe drivers would need to be
compiled in statically rather than as modules.
Thanks
Richard
--
Richard Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-sparc64
Version: 2.6.8-5
Severity: important
After upgrading to version 2.6.8-5 (whose only change was to compile the
dmfe driver (CONFIG_DM9102 = m) the dmfe driver is loaded in preference
to tulip. The former does not work (at least not on the system that I
have a
27 matches
Mail list logo
