Bug#367125: ext2_get_inode: bad inode number

2006-09-26 Thread Peter Kruse
Hello, it looks like that the latest security update to the kernel fixes this problem: http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1184 here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6828 and here: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19396/info Best. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#367125: ext2_get_inode: bad inode number

2006-06-19 Thread Peter Kruse
Hello Goswin,On 6/16/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Did you reboot the nfs server while clients had the fs mounted? Orstoped the nfsd and run fsck or a resize? Anything that could change the inode numbers without the clients getting any notice?Yes, we rebooted and recreated the

Bug#367125: ext2_get_inode: bad inode number

2006-06-16 Thread Peter Kruse
Hello,at the moment our server prints regularily like two times a minute the same message to kern.log:EXT2-fs error (device dm-5): ext2_get_inode: bad inode number: 30130240I checked and the inode really does not exist on the specified device (dm-5 is the device with minor number 5 under /dev/mappe

Bug#367125: knfsd / bad inode number on ext3

2006-06-01 Thread Peter Kruse
Hello, thanks for your info. That means it is a bug in ext3. It seems to ignore the errors=continue mount option, although according to the manpage it should support all the options that ext2 does. Unfortunately I'm not able to reproduce this exact behaviour, however I am able to produce a file

Bug#367125: nfs + ext3 = possible DoS

2006-05-13 Thread Peter Kruse
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smpVersion: 2.6.8-16Hello, Our central nfs-server is running Debian/Sarge and there are ~300 nfs Clients running under Debianor Solaris.  At one point we had to recreate the exported (ext3) filesystems on the server and copy the data back from backup.  Although we