Control: found -1 6.10.6-1~bpo12+1
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 s390x fails with vm.panic_on_oom=1 & kernel.panic=10
Hi,
On 18-07-2024 08:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to work on our s390x host as it seems to
freeze instead. Is this something known?
Hi waldi,
On 24-07-2024 10:57 a.m., Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 08:06:46AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to work on our s390x host as it seems to freeze
instead. Is this something known? Something I'm doing wrong (E.g. these
options behaving d
Hi all,
On 14-07-2024 9:47 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
The host has been running fine so far, I have installed the current
unstable kernel on all arm64 host
Hi all,
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:22:32 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Today I restarted the s390x host of ci.d.n because I lost access.
I have been fighting with the host for several days now, and I think I
finally found the culprit. Several days ago I configured the host to do:
# panic kernel on
Hi,
On 09-07-2024 12:23 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I'll see what I can do.
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
Paul
[1]
https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker-arm64-11/ci-worker-arm64-11/
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.7.12-1~bpo12+1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: elb...@debian.org
Hi linux maintainers,
Today I restarted the s390x host of ci.d.n because I lost access. I
inspected the journal and noticed there
Hi,
On 08-07-2024 10:07 p.m., Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
If you think it worth enough knowing if either is the case, I can
install the backports kernel again on the arm64 hosts, but obviously
that will be annoying for us. Please let me know if I should pursue this
(I would be expecting a bit qu
Hi,
On 28-05-2024 10:54 a.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
If 6.8 migrates to testing, it will break amd64 debci for unrelated
packages for migration tests too. I don't think that's something we
want? Paul, wouldn't that qualify as RC?
With the kernel team being aware of the issue, I trust the kernel
Hi Ben (and all the rest),
On 15-05-2024 9:56 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
Apologies for leaving this bug for so long.
NP, part of live I guess.
Is this bug still occurring?
I don't know. The problem was severe enough for us to abandon the idea
of running the backport kernels on our arm64 h
Hi,
On 03-03-2024 9:01 p.m., Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
cleaned up?
Those actions sound appropriate to me, but I don't know the inner
details well enough
Source: nvidia-cuda-samples
Version: 12.1~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of nvidia-cuda-sampl
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
Version: 525.147.05-5
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of nvidia-graph
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla
Version: 525.147.05-5
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of
nvidi
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470
Version: 470.223.02-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: li...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:linux
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of
n
Hi
On 01-01-2024 22:33, Bastian Blank wrote:
Do we have serial of the machines?
Do you mean of the system where the VM's run, or of the VM itself? IIRC
the qemu backend of autopkgtest is talking to the VM over serial, but if
you want to be sure, I'll need to check.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Hi Bastian,
On 31-12-2023 18:33, Bastian Blank wrote:
Do you have a handy script available to try this by hand? I was just
looking at this test (to unravel the loop logic and replace it with one
test per kernel), but I'm not sure if this ever worked before.
It was nearly completely attached a
Source: linux
Version: 6.6.8-1
Severity: normal
Dear linux maintainers,
Recently I added some isolation-machine support to ci.debian.net and one
of the first packages I tried to run the test for is src:linux.
Unfortunately, the isolation-machine based test (selftests) fails (the
reboot that a
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:54:17 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from
> bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable,
> testing and stable.
We're having
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Ben and the rest,
On 04-12-2023 15:10, Ben Hutchings wrote:
CPU: 6 PID: 15039 Comm: lxc-start Tainted: G D WL
6.5.0-0.deb12.1-arm64 #1 Debian 6.5.3-1~bpo12+1
The D and W flags mean there were prior BUG and WARN errors logged.
Please send those as
Hi all,
On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from
bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable,
testing and stable.
We're having issues [1] with the (backports and) unstable kernel on our
main amd6
Package: linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64
Version: 6.5.3-1
Severity: normal
Dear linux maintainers,
We recently switched the main amd64 worker for ci.d.n to the backports
kernel due to bug 1050256. However, I had the host become unaccessible
twice, so I upgraded to the unstable kernel (not totally my in
Hi Salvatore,
On 09-09-2023 10:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
but should have been support for armel been
dropped earlier and should we do it for trixie
The kernel for armel went over some hardware limits before (I was
affected with my NAS, where I couldn't upgrade the kernel to bullseye as
Control: reassign -1 linux-image-6.1.0-11-amd64 6.1.38-4
Hi slimshady,
Given that it's linux-image-6.1.0-11-amd64 failing to install, I
reassign this bug to that package. However, I wonder if you noticed this
in your error log:
raspi-firmware: missing /boot/firmware, did you forget to mount i
control: reassign -1 src:linux
Hi,
Although it was suggested that this may be due to firmware updates too,
let's reassign to the linux source package for first triaging.
Paul
On 15-06-2023 15:26, Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: important
(Please provide enoug
-information.en.html#no-longer-supported-hardware
On 24-05-2021 06:55, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Kernel team,
I happen to own a QNAP (armel) and I spotted in the changelog that it's
not going to be supported in bullseye. I was wondering, is that
something that should be mentioned in the release
Hi Otto,
On 09-04-2023 03:54, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Paul Gevers asked if the issues are gone as well with 6.1.12-1
(or later 6.1.y series versions, which will land in bookworm). That
would be valuable information to know as well to exclude we do not
have the issue as well in bookworm.
Were
Hi,
On 29-03-2023 23:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
unblock linux/6.1.20-1
ACK on the unblock/age-days 10 request for the d-i team, happy to build
the installer against it. :)
Done. In the passing I also took along the signed versions.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 13:25:36 +1100 Daniel Black wrote:
Since revering to linux-image-5.10.0-20 we've been free of the same errors.
On ci.debian.net I upgraded all ppc64el hosts to bookworm on 2023-03-09.
debian@ci-worker-ppc64el-04:~$ uname -a
Linux ci-worker-ppc64el-04 6.1.0-5-powerpc64le #1
Hi,
On 04-03-2023 17:19, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
So would agree, it make sense to update all remaining hosts and then
look into it again in case the problem arise again.
All but s390x are up-to-date and liburing testing works. I can't upgrade
s390x because of bug #1031753 (which is worse
Control: fixed -1 5.10.162-1 6.1.8-1
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 21:35:58 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 07:42:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> It seems like there was a regression with the latest stable update
> that affects the autopkgtest for liburing. Reassigning.
Please
Hi Salvatore,
On 28-01-2023 17:48, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[On a related note, if you, release team can unblock an let 6.1.7-1
still migrate to testing earlier that that, that would be welcome so
we have several important fixes in already for testing. Though there
is a regressions for i386.
Hi,
On 17-01-2023 07:14, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
I will bite the bullet (taking full responsibility for it if
necessary, don't blame the other kernel team members) and ask here now
the release team: Can we let linux 6.1.4-1 despite the RC bug
reported, migrate to testing, so we can move on t
Source: linux
Version: 5.19.6-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: gcc...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:gcc-11
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of gcc-11 the autopkgtest of linux fails in testing
when
Hi Ben,
On 18-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
For your info, s390x still fails:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/l/linux/24628411/log.gz
Also for ppc64el.
I noticed right after sending.
These two are fixed by:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/commit/8d43
Hi Ben,
On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
failures?
If you promise to fix it in the next upload.
Yes, the fix is
Hi Ben,
On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
linux 5.18.14-1 is currently blocked from migration due to a test
regression on some architectures.
This is actually not a regression: there's a new test case, and it was
defined wrongly for architectures other than amd64 and arm64. That
should
Hi all,
Just a minor follow-up. I just had to restart one of my arm64 workers again.
root@ci-worker-arm64-05:~# uname -a
Linux ci-worker-arm64-05 5.10.0-15-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.120-1
(2022-06-09) aarch64 GNU/Linux
Anything you want me to extract from the current logs?
Paul
OpenPGP_sign
44:38 CEST Paul Gevers wrote:
I noticed in the logs that *after* the reported kernel bug but before
the actual hang, I see multiple instances of:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [apt-get:2204621]
and
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [kcompactd0:40]
on ci-worker-arm64
Hi Diederik,
On 21-06-2022 23:19, Diederik de Haas wrote:
I think that the install logs aren't that important (anymore) as the issue/
symptoms appear to be the same:
- some swap action resulting in some failure
- CPU gets stuck
- watchdog triggers a reboot
If the reboot would actually happen/f
Hi Diederik,
On 21-06-2022 22:07, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Do these errors still occur? Still with 5.10.103-1 or a later one?
The last occurrence of a machine hang I had is from 5 May 2022, but I'm
not sure if I checked if it was this same issue. Normally our kernels
are up-to-date, but I don
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Hi Norman,
On 19-06-2022 21:48, NormanMurray wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: nmur...@telusplanet.net
With 5.10.0.9, randomsound worked well to keep
/proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail up at set point and
/proc/sys/kernel/ran
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Hi Umut,
After asking around, the suspicion is that this is mostly likely due to
the kernel, hence I'm reassigning to the linux source package. If this
was wrong, the kernel maintainers can hopefully help to point where it
should go.
Paul
On 31-03-2022 22:51,
Hi all,
On 20-02-2022 13:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
Sad to say, but this week we had two hangs again.
And this week another two.
ci-worker-arm64-07 ==
Mar 26 10:15:55 ci-worker-arm64-07 kernel: kernel BUG at
include/linux/swapops.h:204!
Mar 26 10:15:55 ci-worker-arm64
Dear colleagues,
The Release Team would like to propose a bookworm freeze timeline. Don't
worry, the timeline is a plan, if serious (timing) issues come up we
will adapt. However, before making the plan public in a wider audience,
we'd like to know from you if you already foresee clashes in ti
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 5.10.84-1
Hi,
Sad to say, but this week we had two hangs again.
The one on ci-worker-arm64-06 had this:
Feb 15 08:51:12 ci-worker-arm64-06 kernel: kernel BUG at
include/linux/swapops.h:204!
Feb 15 08:51:12 ci-worker-arm64-06 kernel: Internal error: Oops -
Hi Chuck,
On 10-02-2022 01:34, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
The problem as I see it is that the debian
installer team is already aware of the problem and has been aware of it
for over six months because #983357 is marked as affecting d-i. So I do
not understand why #983357 is not included on the d-
Hi,
Subject: 983357: Why is it not mentioned in bullseye release notes /
installation guide?
For at least the release notes, because nobody asked the editors to
include it.
On 09-02-2022 21:04, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
However, this is a well-known problem, but neither the Bullseye release
Hi all,
On 04-12-2021 22:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:44:15 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The last couple of days, two of the ci.debian.net arm64 workers became
unresponsive. The systems were rebooted and I found the message in
the journal pasted below.
Of course the absence of
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 5.10.70-1
Hi Ben,
On 23-12-2021 23:46, Ben Mueller wrote:
On 12/23/21 9:05 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
I solved the problem by inserting a boot parameter "intel_iommu=off" to
grub. With this parameter the kernel from bullseye
linux-image-5.10.0-9-amd64 w
Hi,
On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:44:15 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The last couple of days, two of the ci.debian.net arm64 workers became
unresponsive. The systems were rebooted and I found the message in
the journal pasted below.
Please let me know if you need more info about these systems.
As
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Hi,
On 08-10-2021 13:06, Lorenzo Iannuzzi wrote:
> - Were there any problems with the system after upgrading?
> USB 3.0 ports stop working at boot or as soon as I plug more than one device.
> Devices attached to them are not recognized and not listed with lsusb. I h
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:02:07 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> linux (5.10.46-5) bullseye-security; urgency=high
[...]
> * netfilter: nf_tables: initialize set before expression setup
> (Closes: #993978)
Just to confirm, this seems to have fixed the issue we saw on
ci.debian.net as
Source: linux, zfs-linux
Control: found -1 linux/5.14.6-2
Control: found -1 zfs-linux/2.0.3-9
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of linux ans linux-si
Hi,
On 09-09-2021 09:37, Paul Gevers wrote:
> All the architectures (amd64, arm64, ppc64el and s390x) that we have
> experience these hangs. I'm absolutely not claiming that the root cause
> is the same, but on buster we didn't experience this (our s390x host
> never worker
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.46-4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org
Severity: serious
Justification: data loss
Hi,
As discussed over IRC, here is the bug report for one of the hanging
arm64 hosts we have for ci.debian.net.
Since the upgrade of our hosts to bullseye (d
Control: reassign -1 kernel
Hi,
Although as you said, it may be something else, as it's the kernel
logging this, I reassign to the kernel package, in the hope they are
more able to pinpoint where the problem lies.
Paul
On 24-08-2021 10:53, hox...@noramail.jp wrote:
> Package: upgrade-reports
>
Source: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.140
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, shellch...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:shellcheck
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of shellcheck th
Hi Bernd,
Thanks for your report.
On 21-06-2021 18:04, Bernd Breuer wrote:
> after the recent upgrade to Buster 10.10 (including a kernel upgrade) the
> command 'lxc-attach' (out of the Linux Container (lxc) set of commands),
> typed in like
>
> "sudo lxc-attach "
>
> stopped working with the
Hi all,
Proposed text for the release notes attached.
On 11-06-2021 21:47, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-06-12 at 03:01 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:22 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:32:23AM +0200, Pa
Hi Roger,
Thanks for the reply,
On 11-06-2021 20:01, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:22 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
>>> On 24-05-2021 06:55, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>>> I happen to own a QNAP (armel) and I spotted in the changelog that it's
&
Hi Kernel team,
I know everybody is busy, but friendly ping.
On 24-05-2021 06:55, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I happen to own a QNAP (armel) and I spotted in the changelog that it's
> not going to be supported in bullseye. I was wondering, is that
> something that should be mentioned
Hi,
On 01-06-2021 08:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The version is not 4 days in unstable, looks good to me to let it
> migrate to testing (unless Cyril spotted issues in recent d-i tests).
I'm still good to go.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: reassign -1 linux
Hi Lamome,
Sorry it took so long to respond, but normally upgrade-reports as pseudo
package in the bts is used for upgrade reports from the current (or just
replaced) stable to the future (or just released) stable. I was confused
by your "version numbers" of linux as I
Hi Kernel team,
I happen to own a QNAP (armel) and I spotted in the changelog that it's
not going to be supported in bullseye. I was wondering, is that
something that should be mentioned in the release notes? Obviously I
don't mean because I own it, but I'm betting that support for particular
hard
Hi kernel team,
As is custom in the final phases of the release, I'm asking you to think
about issues that are worth mentioning in the release notes for bullseye
from the perspective of the kernel.
Feel free to reply to this e-mail, or, even better, to bts against the
release-notes package if the
Hi
On 08-03-2021 20:50, maximilian attems wrote:
> so please unblock firmware-nonfree 20210208-3
Please file a bug, as this message has a high chance to get lost (the
volume of traffic is rising) as it's not actionable right now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi maks,
On 08-03-2021 19:46, maximilian attems wrote:
> non-free packages were never considered key by Debian afair.
https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi disagrees. The
release team uses this list as the canonical source for the
implementation for the automatic blocks.
Paul
O
Hi,
On 08-03-2021 10:39, maximilian attems wrote:
> Tomorrow once firmware-nonfree has migrated 20210208-4 will be uploaded
> with important small fixes to Raspberry Pi 4B and BananaPi M2 ultra and
> BananaPi M3 supports. As all changes are quite small and current window
> allows important fixes,
Package: autopkgtest
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 19:21:11 +0100 Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 15:59 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Please add "Restrictions: skip-not-installable" to the amd64-* tests, so
> > that they will be skipped if the test-dependencies are uninstallable.
> [...]
>
moval from testing before bullseye is frozen.
We are currently unaware of any new architectures likely to be ready in
time for inclusion in bullseye.
On behalf of the release team,
Paul Gevers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.136
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, shellch...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:shellcheck
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of shellcheck th
Control: retitle -1 libgcc1 should add a Breaks on cryptsetup-initramfs
Hi Matthias, initramfs-tools maintainers,
> Am Montag, den 03.02.2020, 18:59 +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> > I'm fine to add some breaks if required.
cryptsetup-initramfs version 2:2.2.2-3 already worked around the issue
a
Source: linux, systemtap
Control: found -1 linux/5.3.7-1
Control: found -1 systemtap/4.1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest
clone 864320 -1
reassign -1 initramfs-tools
retitle -1 update-initramfs silently failed to change \
initrd/conf/conf.d/cryptroot
> 4.
>
> one of my goals is to set up a new drive as a backup -- with
> accessibility fixed as much as possible -- in case there are
> problems booting to my main drive
Source: linux
Version: 4.19.37-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of linux the autopkgtest of linux fails in testing
when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of linux from
unstable. I
Dear kernel team,
I hope I didn't miss your response, but AFAICT the request below is
still open. A reply like "no, there is no need for any specifics" is
also very welcome.
On 06-04-2019 21:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear kernel team,
>
> I am reaching out to you as I
Dear kernel team,
I am reaching out to you as I help to coordinate this release's
release-notes. In most release-notes in the past, there have been words
about the kernel. For buster, is there anything that is worth mentioning
in the notes?
We already mention that AppArmor is pulled in via Recomm
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:08:14 + Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> "Graphics rendering may be very slow on Intel 'Ironlake M' GPUs (PCI
> ID 8086:0046) when an IOMMU (VT-d) is enabled. The IOMMU
> functionality can be disabled for the GPU by adding the kernel
> parameter 'intel_iommu=igfx_off'."
Th
Hi all,
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:44:47 +0100 Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 00:31 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Any ideas for how to word a hint about this for
> > the wheezy release-notes?
>
> Hrm, how about:
>
> The version of u-boot shipped from the factory on many
>
Hi
On 06/24/16 22:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> But just to be honest and complete, also not all traffic for this NAS is
>> going via the dongle anymore, as it is now also connect via UTP wire.
>> Furthermore, due to its location, it is also missing the audio USB.
>
> Do you
Hi,
On 19-06-16 19:08, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I reverted to version 3.16.7-ckt25-1 on Thursday, and haven't seen the
> issue since.
Still true, no issues so far.
> But just to be honest and complete, also not all traffic for this NAS is
> going via the dongle anymore, as it is
Hi,
On 16-06-16 20:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am going to try if installing the previous kernel actually helps and
> report back in one or two days.
I reverted to version 3.16.7-ckt25-1 on Thursday, and haven't seen the
issue since.
Jun 16 20:27:44 fuji sudo: paul : TTY=pts/0
Hi,
Maybe some more useful information:
After my latest reboot, just before the already reported error log line
occurs, the following can be found in the syslog:
Jun 16 00:01:30 fuji wpa_supplicant[386]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED
bssid=4c:09:d4:98:fb:c1 reason=4 locally_generated=1
Jun 16 0
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On 14-06-16 23:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> What was the previous installed version? (/var/log/dpkg.log should
> show this.)
2016-06-05 10:31:50 upgrade linux-image-3.16.0-4-kirkwood:armel
3.16.7-ckt25-1 3.16.7-ckt25-2
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Package: linux-image-3.16.0-4-kirkwood
Version: 3.16.7-ckt25-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Since a couple of days, my QNAP NAS TS-219 is dropping its WiFi connection,
after which I can only reboot the system to get it back (as far as I know).
Although I am no
On 07-04-14 19:30, Jarek Czekalski wrote:
> If there was a place to get deb files for 3.12, the rest should be easy.
http://snapshot.debian.org/
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi kernel team,
Last week I stumbled upon the current text in the release-notes about
kernel/udev upgrade. If we don't update it, it says (among other things)
the text below [1]. I believe this text is obsolete and was ONLY meant
for the lenny to squeeze update. Do you agree that this part should
87 matches
Mail list logo
