Dear Salvatore,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
Am 21.02.25 um 19:13 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
Control: forcemerge 1088747 1098512
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 06:04:40PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Package: linux-perf
Version: 6.12.15-1
Severity: normal
With
$ LANG= dpkg -l linux
not shown anymore. Still nothing
is shown, but that is for another bug report.
Kind regards,
Paul
nels. Some hosts
apparently are currently not upgradable. I also heard that newer
hardware is incompatible with the ABI used in Debian. How do you see a
future for mips64el in Debian?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rd=on,if=virtio -net
nic,model=virtio-net-pci,macaddr=52:c6:11:00:00:18 -net
tap,ifname=tap.jitsi,script=/bin/true,downscript=/bin/true
Kind regards,
Paul
x/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/patches/bugfix/powerpc/fbdev-offb-Update-expected-device-name.patch?ref_type=heads
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
son for this hang is.
Adrian
> [1]
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/patches/bugfix/powerpc/fbdev-offb-Update-expected-device-name.patch?ref_type=heads
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
m that the
machine hang after debian-installer started.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hello,
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 12:37 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I have reopened this bug as this problem even shows on ppc64el again
> with the latest netinst daily build downloaded from [1]. I have tested
> the image on an IBM 8247-42L inside a PowerKVM virtual machine.
iso-cd/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033058
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
ernel v6.8 or
newer still boots on your setup? I tested the ppc64 installation image
on a PowerKVM server and the console just hangs right after the kernel
starts.
Removing the patch fixes the problem for me.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Develop
Control: found -1 6.10.6-1~bpo12+1
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 s390x fails with vm.panic_on_oom=1 & kernel.panic=10
Hi,
On 18-07-2024 08:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to work on our s390x host as it seems to
freeze instead. Is this something known?
Linux although the latter doesn't have high priority at the
moment.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
gz
/mnt/uImage-6.5.gz: u-boot legacy uImage, Linux-6.5.0, Linux/SuperH, OS Kernel
Image (gzip), 4421099 bytes, Fri May 3 11:48:38 2024, Load Address:
0X80001000, Entry Point: 0X80002000, Header CRC:
0X98EEB114, Data CRC: 0X2F5A3D34
root@tirpitz:~>
Adrian
--
.''`. John Pa
Hi Ben,
On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 17:14 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 16:55 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > OK, thanks a lot, this is very useful to know.
> > >
> > > But just to clarify, can I just apply this to the current latest De
; normally?
> >
> > Sorry, if that's too obvious, I just want to avoid producing noise.
>
> You can apply it to the latest version in experimental, yes.
Thanks! Will give it a try.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `
OK, thanks a lot, this is very useful to know.
But just to clarify, can I just apply this to the current latest Debian
package, run debian/rules debian/control-real and build the package
normally?
Sorry, if that's too obvious, I just want to avoid producing noise.
Adrian
--
.''
you able to test now?
Yes, I can give it a try tomorrow. Can I just apply the changes from the
branch on top of the current kernel package and then just build the package
with "dpkg-buildpackage -B" or is there anything else I need to know?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul
b/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=75bc255a7444801d64c7a7bd09e3f452f86b3585
> [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2024/07/msg1.html
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hi waldi,
On 24-07-2024 10:57 a.m., Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 08:06:46AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
However, that doesn't seem to work on our s390x host as it seems to freeze
instead. Is this something known? Something I'm doing wrong (E.g. these
options behaving d
Hi Ben,
On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 15:16 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-07-20 at 21:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> [...]
> > > - Does anyone have it working with a recent (6.3 or later) Debian
> > > kernel package, and if so how?
> >
>
t@debian-project-be-2:~#
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hi all,
On 14-07-2024 9:47 a.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
The host has been running fine so far, I have installed the current
unstable kernel on all arm64 host
am, but I would love
to be able to boot a Debian kernel again. I have no clue how to reduce
the kernel image size at this point though.
I am currently not using an initrd with my custom kernel.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Debian kernel flavours.
>
> > Will take care of it and let you know when it's (some hours).
>
> Thank you!
There are now 120 GB of free disk space. Let me know if that's sufficient
or whether I need to clean up more, probably asking others to clean up
their home dir
/ppc64 machines (buildds and porterbox).
I'm cleaning up the porterbox now, disk is quite full, then you can try
to build the kernel package on perotto.debian.net or I can try it myself.
I have seen the bug myself and I wanted to debug it, but the attempt was
foiled by the fact that the disk
Hi all,
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 09:22:32 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Today I restarted the s390x host of ci.d.n because I lost access.
I have been fighting with the host for several days now, and I think I
finally found the culprit. Several days ago I configured the host to do:
# panic kernel on
Hi,
On 09-07-2024 12:23 p.m., Paul Gevers wrote:
I'll see what I can do.
For the record: I have installed the unstable kernel on one of the
workers (ci-worker-arm64-11 [1]). Let's see how it behaves.
Paul
[1]
https://ci.debian.net/munin/ci-worker-arm64-11/ci-worker-arm64-11/
were a lot kernel messages
(several tens to hundreds per day) like "User process fault:
interruption code 003b ilc:3 in my_kmcdump[2aa0798+f000]". I
attached the first block I found in the journal after the reboot.
Please let me know if you need more information.
Paul
PS: I ch
y for the 6.8.y series though the package is not yet out
of backports-new.
I'll see what I can do.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Debian folks,
Am 26.06.24 um 12:43 schrieb Paul Menzel:
[…]
On the Dell XPS 13 9360 with
$ lspci -nn -s 3a:00
3a:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Qualcomm Atheros QCA6174 802.11ac
Wireless Network Adapter [168c:003e] (rev 32)
$ dpkg -l firmware-atheros
[…]
ii
-
ed43130330c505b084de2c5b820c32b0
QCA6174/hw3.0/4.4.1/firmware-6.bin_WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00309-
It’d be great if you could distribute that version, as I still
experience some problems with the firmware version 288.
Kind regards,
Paul
[1]:
https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/ath-firmware/ath10k-firmware/-/commit
Hi,
On 28-05-2024 10:54 a.m., Luca Boccassi wrote:
If 6.8 migrates to testing, it will break amd64 debci for unrelated
packages for migration tests too. I don't think that's something we
want? Paul, wouldn't that qualify as RC?
With the kernel team being aware of the issue, I t
s
(I would be expecting a bit quicker turn around on this bug if you say
yes now ;) ).
If the bug is still occurring, can you say what type of filesystem
rsync is being run on?
I'm not sure if this is the answer you're looking for, we use ext4.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description:
Dear Bastian,
Am 03.04.24 um 18:26 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am 01.04.24 um 22:29 schrieb Bastian Blank:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
$ grep UUID /etc/default/grub
# Uncomment if you don't want GRUB to pass "root=UUID=xxx"
par
Dear Bastian,
Am 01.04.24 um 22:29 schrieb Bastian Blank:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:44:44PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
$ grep UUID /etc/default/grub
# Uncomment if you don't want GRUB to pass "root=UUID=xxx" parameter to
Linux
GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true
I
r 03 10:54:41 2024 ##
>
> will the LPARCFG option be activated on future versions?
The Debian kernel maintainers are informed since I have reassigned the bug to
the kernel package. I assume this will be fixed in the near future.
I might do it myself if I find the time during the
nough to see if there are traps set out.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-cuda-samples/42760273/log.gz
1664s I: Testing binary package nvidia-fs-dkms
1664s I: Trying to install build dependency nvidia-cu
n.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers/42760274/log.gz
810s # MODPOST /usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/Module.symvers
810sscripts/mod/modpost
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla/42735533/log.gz
202s # MODPOST /usr/src/modules/nvidia-tesla-kernel/Module.symvers
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=linux
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470/42735534/log.gz
320s # MODPOST
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia-tesla-470/470.2
Dear Bastian,
Thank you for your reply.
Am 24.01.24 um 21:01 schrieb Bastian Blank:
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:13:05PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Trying to quickly start a VM, it’d be great to not use an initrd image, and
also use the Virtio features, for example
=m`). It’d be great, if it
could be built into the Linux kernel cloud image.
Kind regards,
Paul
ers and I think there
is a chance we might see these in the foreseeable future.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
are not affected by this bug, the powerpc build
fails
because of a packaging problem.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hi
On 01-01-2024 22:33, Bastian Blank wrote:
Do we have serial of the machines?
Do you mean of the system where the VM's run, or of the VM itself? IIRC
the qemu backend of autopkgtest is talking to the VM over serial, but if
you want to be sure, I'll need to che
ebian/tests/selftests
Paul
diff --git a/debian/tests/selftests b/debian/tests/selftests
index 02cc29372e..ff12a0cd17 100644
--- a/debian/tests/selftests
+++ b/debian/tests/selftests
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-#!/bin/bash -eu
+#!/bin/bash -eux
PATH=/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ step=$(
nstead of squeezing everything
in one autopkgtest (stanza) it's probably smarter to generate a stanza
per kernel you want to run (because then you're only limited by the
overall timeout of 8.5 hours).
Paul
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.p
ll and close this bug report.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 20:54:17 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from
> bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable,
> testing and stable.
We're having
well.
Please find attached the content of the journal since the reboot. I
filtered out "debci".
Paul
kernel-bug-part0.log.xz
Description: application/xz
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[To: +debian-kernel@lists.debian.org]
Dear Jeff, dear Debian Linux kernel team,
Am 14.11.23 um 19:19 schrieb Jeff Johnson:
On 11/14/2023 9:32 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On 11/12/2023 4:13 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
On the Dell XPS 13 9360 with Debian sid/unstable, Linux 6.5.10 logs the
error
Package: iproute2
Version: 6.5.0-4
Severity: minor
Usertags: formatting
The hermetic-/usr changes to the manual pages documenting the new
locations in /usr of the files previously in /etc and overridable
by user files in /etc broke the formatting in the manual pages.
The /usr paths have "or" appe
Hi all,
On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from
bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable,
testing and stable.
We're having issues [1] with the (backports and) unstable kernel on our
main amd6
re details.
I'm sending this from my laptop, if I should collect information from
the host, please let me know.
Paul
Sep 17 07:43:48 ci-worker13 kernel: general protection fault, probably for
non-canonical address 0xcb9d265a04e18934: [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
Sep 17 07:43:48 ci-worker13 kern
On Sat, 2023-09-09 at 11:42 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The first one is the one with included size limitations, because those
> load the kernel from a pre-defined flash partition, whose size can't be
> easily changed by the user. This one is now overflowing for the second
> to last documented
fit on the
hardware. That means that you don't cripple the hardware of affected
people, but "merely" can't give them security support? I guess it would
be possible (as long as support lasts; no LTS support) for effected
systems to run the security supported bullseye kern
mount it?
I'm not familiar with raspi-firmware nor run-parts, but isn't this
likely pointing at a problem with your system that you need to fix first?
Paul
On 15-08-2023 23:02, slimshady wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: slimshad...@zohomail.eu
(Please
On Sun, 2023-08-13 at 11:51 +, John Scott wrote:
> Because carl9170 is largely under the GPL and we're obligated to
> distribute complete sources for our binaries, I've set Static-Built-
> Using on both gcc (because of libgcc) and Newlib.
FYI, that wasn't the correct thing to do.
Built-Using
6d2b3a31 [2], and the
Linux configuration was not updated.
Kind regards,
Paul
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a77a94f86273ce42a39cb479217dd8d68acfe0ff
[2]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id
Hi Bastian!
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:07 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 08:41:03PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Please enable building the linux-libc-dev package for the new Debian
> > architecture loong64.
> > The corresponding kernel a
"loongarch".
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
quot;ACPI: OSI: Remove Linux-Dell-Video _OSI string")
>
> Nick has found that runtime PM is *not* working for nouveau.
>
> If you recall we did 24867516f06d because 5775b843a619 was
> supposed to have fixed it.
Gotcha, I guess keep me updated since it seems like things -might- be working
from what I gathered here? Happy to look further if they find that 6.4-rc is
broken though
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
control: reassign -1 src:linux
Hi,
Although it was suggested that this may be due to firmware updates too,
let's reassign to the linux source package for first triaging.
Paul
On 15-06-2023 15:26, Jeffrey Mark Siskind wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: important
(Please pr
Hi Kernel team,
Last release I sent out the message below and in the end we included
something [1] in the Release Notes mentioning dropped support. Is there
something like that worth mentioning this time around?
Paul
[1]
https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/armel/release-notes/ch
Hi Otto,
On 09-04-2023 03:54, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Paul Gevers asked if the issues are gone as well with 6.1.12-1
(or later 6.1.y series versions, which will land in bookworm). That
would be valuable information to know as well to exclude we do not
have the issue as well in bookworm.
Were
Hi,
On 29-03-2023 23:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
unblock linux/6.1.20-1
ACK on the unblock/age-days 10 request for the d-i team, happy to build
the installer against it. :)
Done. In the passing I also took along the signed versions.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital
le #1 SMP Debian 6.1.12-1
(2023-02-15) ppc64le GNU/Linux
Can you check if the errors are still the same (yes, there's still
intermittent failures).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
worse for ci.d.n than this bug
as far as I see).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
sume this bug is fixed in that version. Is it worth
pursuing the real issue here?
Paul
root@ci-061-705317d0:/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.v8gx_5j5/downtmp# cat
test-unit-stdout
+ [ -n ]
+ CC=gcc
+ ./configure --cc=gcc
prefix/usr
includedir/us
. Help from people interested in i386 would
be very welcome.]
I've added the hint, but are these regressions in cryptsetup and
libguestfs tracked somewhere? As a bare minimum I've CC'd their
maintainers in this message so that they are aware, and I've added our
i386 porter ex
ve on to 6.1.y?
I have added the hints. linux should migrate in the 22:00 UTC britney run.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
amp;raw=0
> [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908161#10
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
ons.
(I've encountered a few circumstances where configure_networking times out
before the network and DHCP are functional after a power outage.)
Just a brief demonstration of the surprising-to-me(-and-of-course-documented)
behavior:
paul@haley ~ % cat repro.sh
#!/bin/sh
. /nonexistent
in their copies of
the former descriptions. If the number was omitted, the translations will be
made automatically in the DDTP.
Perhaps this is possible for at least one of the descriptions.
Regards.
Jean-Paul Guillonneau, french translator of Debian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.5
n
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gcc-11
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/l/linux/26272813/log.gz
I: Found quick flavour cloud-amd64
I: Build for 5.19.0-1-cloud-amd64
make: Entering
/8d439f0beb3f97ff0e11dae3d70da33597642f9f
Thanks a lot for the quick fix.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Ben,
On 01-08-2022 23:09, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 22:53 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 01-08-2022 22:46, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
failures?
If you promise to fix it in the next upload.
Yes, the fix is
That
should be fixed with the next upload, but I'd rather not go through
another build/sign/build/wait cycle.
Could you please allow this version to enter testing despite the test
failures?
If you promise to fix it in the next upload.
hint added.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenP
Hi all,
Just a minor follow-up. I just had to restart one of my arm64 workers again.
root@ci-worker-arm64-05:~# uname -a
Linux ci-worker-arm64-05 5.10.0-15-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.120-1
(2022-06-09) aarch64 GNU/Linux
Anything you want me to extract from the current logs?
Paul
44:38 CEST Paul Gevers wrote:
I noticed in the logs that *after* the reported kernel bug but before
the actual hang, I see multiple instances of:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [apt-get:2204621]
and
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [kcompactd0:40]
on ci-worker-arm64
(f.e.) I could. Also, if upstream is made aware there is an issue (even
infrequent), then they can make the most informed choice what to do with it.
Ack.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
#x27;m sure
I would have reported it to this bug.
If it still occurs, then the likely only way to get a possible resolve is
reporting it to upstream.
1.5 months is quite long for it to be gone, although, before that it was
2.5 months.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
anges to random, so I interpreted that as being intended. I've
reassigned to the linux source package, as they can confirm that this is
not a bug, or treat it appropriately.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 2022-06-10 at 00:36 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> A year has passed and it has been quiet on the upstream bug for almost a year.
> Has there been progress which isn't visible in upstream or Debian's BTS?
There hasn't. I haven't had time to try this bug again but I will try
to make time
e)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'./debian/build/source_rt/Kconfig'
(sid_ia64-dchroot)glaubitz@yttrium:~/linux2/linux-5.17.3$
Does anyone know what I am doing wrong? Is the above way still the correct
method for
changing the kernel configuration in
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Hi Umut,
After asking around, the suspicion is that this is mostly likely due to
the kernel, hence I'm reassigning to the linux source package. If this
was wrong, the kernel maintainers can hopefully help to point where it
should go.
Paul
On 31-03-2022
Hi all,
On 20-02-2022 13:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
Sad to say, but this week we had two hangs again.
And this week another two.
ci-worker-arm64-07 ==
Mar 26 10:15:55 ci-worker-arm64-07 kernel: kernel BUG at
include/linux/swapops.h:204!
Mar 26 10:15:55 ci-worker-arm64
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 15:18:49 +0100 Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> "iotop" complains:
>
> CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT not enabled in kernel, cannot determine SWAPIN and IO %
For more recent Linux kernel versions you need this:
sudo sysctl kernel.task_delayacct=1
I'm guessing that the patches changing
e 2 - Soft Freeze
2023-03-12 - Milestone 3 - Hard Freeze
TBA- Milestone 4 - Full Freeze
On behalf of the Release Team,
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- BUG: 0
[#1] SMP
root@ci-worker-arm64-06:~# uname -a
Linux ci-worker-arm64-06 5.10.0-10-arm64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.84-1
(2021-12-08) aarch64 GNU/Linux
I'm upgrading the workers to the latest kernel now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n the bullseye (and also
RC versions) d-i errata pages?
This is the most establish process, so yes, I suggest you just go and
follow that route, even without a reply here. Than it's documented in
the right place [1].
Paul
[1] unless I'm much mistaken, that would be against the
ins
guide might
be a better place. Either way, I read the bug, but I don't have any
knowledge on xen, so I feel uncomfortable proposing a text. If it should
go into the release notes, please file a bug against the release-notes
package.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP di
Hi all,
On 04-12-2021 22:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 13:44:15 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
The last couple of days, two of the ci.debian.net arm64 workers became
unresponsive. The systems were rebooted and I found the message in
the journal pasted below.
Of course the absence of
ot image? [1]
Adrian
> [1]
> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/snapshots/2021-10-20/debian-11.0.0-sparc64-NETINST-1.iso
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berli
-nonfree
pn firmware-misc-nonfree
pn firmware-myricom
pn firmware-netxen
pn firmware-qlogic
pn firmware-realtek
pn firmware-samsung
pn firmware-siano
pn firmware-ti-connectivity
pn xen-hypervisor
-- no debconf
On Thu, 2022-01-13 at 20:54 +, John Scott wrote:
> You might like to have a look at this mail from Ben Hutchings:
> https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/179d6d32466dd13962a3aab251c45242fbf2d8ae.ca...@decadent.org.uk
> The reason that none of the other Wi-Fi firmware packages have them is
> be
On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 18:25 +, John Scott wrote:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/carl9170fw/carl9170fw_1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1.dsc
Some things that prevent the upload of this package:
I don't think udebs are needed for firmware packages, none of the other
WiFi firmware packages
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 5.10.70-1
Hi Ben,
On 23-12-2021 23:46, Ben Mueller wrote:
On 12/23/21 9:05 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
I solved the problem by inserting a boot parameter "intel_iommu=off" to
grub. With this parameter the kernel from bullseye
linux-image-5.10.0-9-amd64 w
1 - 100 of 783 matches
Mail list logo
