Hello,
People here might be interested to know that Xen pvops dom0 core
was merged to upstream Linux kernel during the 2.6.37 merge window!
This has been in the works for a long time, so it's good news.
Note that this is the core/initial merge, there's more upstreaming
needed to get for example
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 01:16:20AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:27:16PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 23:52 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:28:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:27:16PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 23:52 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:28:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Please send such mails to the maintainer of the package, not me.
> > >
&g
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:28:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Please send such mails to the maintainer of the package, not me.
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:55:33PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Is there a plan to update the dom0-capable kernel to the latest
> > ve
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 03:58:57PM +0100, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > There's a lot of people using Xen and Debian, how is the best solution
> > for a stable (production) kernel? (Xen+Lenny) ? Use the 2.6.32-10-xen
> > sid kernel in production servers?!?
>
> i use plain lenny for m
Hello,
Debian Lenny linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen uses an early snapshot of Novell SLES11
patches,
so I guess someone would have to go through the SLES11 kernel-xen patches
and see what has changed.. I believe SLES11 Xen patches have numerous bugfixes
compared to what is in Lenny.
ftp://ftp.suse.com
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:06:56AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > That was opposed quite strongly by the kernel folks last time it was
> > > attempted. Were there any fundamental changes in the Xen dom0 patches
> > > since then?
> >
>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:50:12PM +, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 15:44:54 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > It's worth noting that Fedora 12 already ships Nouveau, with 2.6.31 kernel.
> >
> It's worth noting that RH has a number of peo
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:33:49PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 22:15 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to pull nouveau from 2.6.33 into Debian's 2.6.32. I'm hoping
> > > this would allow for replacement of nv and its dodgy source with nou
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 12:39:00AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-3
> Severity: normal
>
> I don't seem to have the CPU flags for Intel virtualisation from the processor
> to run KVM, Xen and friends. I double-checked the BIOS and virtualisation
> is enable
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:33:07PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get the
> > upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and obviou
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:23:28AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages,
>
> The hypervisor works well, but the Linux Dom0 packages are not available
> yet, upstream is again f
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
> wrote:
> >Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake because KVM
> >requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
>
> Xen is unsupportable due
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:13:27PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > pv_ops dom0 patches will require more maintenance than the forward-ports
> > though.. since it's not yet feature-complete, and will have many
&
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 11:06 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:53:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:45:52AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > xen dom 0
> > +
> > Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
> > implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subje
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:00:21AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 23:19 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > >
> > > xen dom 0
> > > +
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
>
> xen dom 0
> +
>
> Upstream development is splintered but Bastian Blank is willing to
> implement the patch for squeeze. Final decision on inclusion subject
> to building.
>
Novell/OpenSUSE has forward-ported Xen (dom0)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:50:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was reading the earlier discussion from here:
> http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.kernel/browse_thread/thread/e2338dd1590b3375/686d088bb32341c6?lnk=raot&pli=1
>
> .. and want
Hello,
I was reading the earlier discussion from here:
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.debian.kernel/browse_thread/thread/e2338dd1590b3375/686d088bb32341c6?lnk=raot&pli=1
.. and wanted to contribute a bit.
This wiki page lists the available Xen dom0 kernels/patches:
http://wiki.xensource.co
- Forwarded message from Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Xen-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Virtualization Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:51:37 -0700
Subject: [Xen-de
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:56:24PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:44:00PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:26:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:53:52PM +0300, Teodor wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPara
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:11:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> >
> > Without dom0, lenny will be unusable for several installations of mine
> > which presently run an ugly combination of etch's dom0 and lenny's
> > kernel. I
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:11:06AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:35 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 02:23:26PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:57:26AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:51 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > see relevant posts of Ian Campbell on d-kernel
> > >
&g
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:35:09PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:51:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >
> >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:50:22AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:51:12AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:42 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > I guess it was faster _now_, but they'll have to live with the forward
> > porting pain for years more now..
>
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:40:38AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 11:12 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:54:50AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
> > important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and in
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:22:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:46:37PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390862
>
> > Is there anything that could be done with this, at this (late) point?
So.. is there anything to do about this?
-- Pasi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >
> > What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
> > non-pae versions with pae versions?
> >
&g
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>
> What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
> non-pae versions with pae versions?
>
> Rationale:
>
> - not increase in archive size or linux-2.6 package build time,
>
> - this will improve
36 matches
Mail list logo
