Bug#655387: [PATCH net] cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-04-26 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2012, 12:55:03 schrieb Bjørn Mork: > Some RNDIS devices include a bogus CDC Union descriptor pointing > to non-existing interfaces. The RNDIS code is already prepared > to handle devices without a CDC Union descriptor by hardwiring > the driver to use interfaces 0 and 1, w

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:56:37 schrieb Markus Kolb: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:16 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:29:57 schrieb Markus Kolb: > >> Is it really a broken union descriptor? > >> There is all information but the origi

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:29:57 schrieb Markus Kolb: > Is it really a broken union descriptor? > There is all information but the original cdc_ether code can only > handle union descriptor which starts with 0. > That is something e.g. the Windows driver can handle. Possibly cdc-ether is al

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 09:36:56 schrieb Iker Salmón San Millán: > 2012/1/11 Bjørn Mork > > > if you have the patience to test yet-another-patch. > > > > > > Bjørn > > > > Yes, I do, but: > > 2012/1/11 Oliver Neukum said: > >You ar

Bug#655387: [PATCH] usb: cdc_ether: Ignore bogus union descriptor for RNDIS devices

2012-01-10 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012, 23:15:16 schrieb Bjørn Mork: > - goto bad_desc; > + /* Fallback to guessing for rndis > +* class devices with bogus union > +* descriptor. > +

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch, attach, RFC] usb-serial: ti_usb removing firmware

2006-12-15 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2006 10:30 schrieb Oleg Verych: > On 12/14/06, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:10:46PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > Hallo. Due to very big distance to my usual work stand, please accept > > > this. > > > > Hm, I don't think this driver

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-07 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 17:01 schrieb Humberto Massa: > Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > > As this has been discussed numerous times and consensus never > > achieved and is unlikely to be achieved, I suggest that you keep this > > discussion internal to Debian u

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-07 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 7. April 2005 16:30 schrieb Humberto Massa: > I don't recall anyone asking Intel to give theirs designs away. This > thread is about: > > 1. (mainly) some firmware hexdumps present in the kernel source tree are > either expicitly marked as being GPL'd or unmarked, in which case on