Horms wrote:
Horms,
Thank you for the summary. You have made the versioned patching system
clearer to me. I tried the commands you suggested to build the kernel. I
have had package versioning problems trying to compile etch kernel on
sarge ( gcc (>= 4:4.0) kernel-package (>= 9.008.3) ).
I
wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Nick Hill wrote:
I have tried and failed to find a howto which will fill my need:
I need a howto which gives the steps, package names and repositories to
1) Build a kernel just like the binary distribution in testing/unstable.
2) Build as 1) above but be able t
I have tried and failed to find a howto which will fill my need:
I need a howto which gives the steps, package names and repositories to
1) Build a kernel just like the binary distribution in testing/unstable.
2) Build as 1) above but be able to apply/remove patches during the
build process
I understand Ralink are the only vendor to have a 54g wireless chipset
which does not require the host to upload (non-free) firmware.
Ralink have also released software and interface specs, and released a
driver under the GPL.
The Ralink RT2500 kernel module is included by default with the ke
may break compatibility with older versions of cdrecord (such as
that supplied with woody). Given that sarge will be using 2.6.8, this
problem will, to the most part, be avoided.
Nick Hill wrote:
Everything I have checked points to the conclusion the version of
CDrecord on my system is the curr
maximilian attems wrote:
> you don't seem to use the debian cdrecord package,
try out, self compiled binaries are not supported by debian.
debian's cdrecord -version shows an different input.
if it still doesn't work, please provide full debian version with
$ dpkg -l
for example
dpkg -l cdrecord
maximilian attems wrote:
which version of cdrecord or growisofs package are you using?
Both are listed in both the Debian and kernel.org bug along with plenty
of other info.
Cdrecord-Clone 2.01.01a01
* growisofs by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 5.21
> cant duplicate your problem with 2.6.11 and n
I have demonstrated this bug with a vanilla kernel.org kernel. I have
found a similar blocking bug submitted on 20th February and appended a
copy of the Debian bug.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4234
Given the severity of the bug, I am surprised it has survived two kernel
versions.
That should be debian kernel 2.6.11-3
which patches to 2.6.11.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This bug still exists in kernel-image-2.6.11.7 and I would say is
release critical.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have compiled 2.6.11 with the latest kernel-image from svn. The
problem still occurs with 2.6.11.
Just a guess but Joerg Schilling maintains CDrecord and filed bug 301641
about kernel include files still inconsistent on sarge. Could this be
related?
Horms wrote:
2.6.10 isn't really being upd
11 matches
Mail list logo
