On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, there's no (performance or size) penalty in enabling it [...]
>
> It's not very large, but yes there is a cost.
>
>
Is it enough to leave it disabled? It seems that being a (standard) sysfs
interface, the penalty is not really muc
ms
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ben Hutchings
> To: 858084-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:13:03 +0100
> Subject: Re: Bug#858084: linux-image-amd64 - kernel option enable request
> On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 10:16 +0
Hello,
I think this bug can be closed as the kernel version has been updated which
pretty much was the purpose of the original bug request.
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Narayanan.
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 4.9+79~bpo8+1
Can you please enable the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS option for the
kernels.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Narayanan.
:50 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [Reply to all, not just to me.]
>
> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 08:42 +0530, Narayanan R S wrote:
> > Hello Ben,
> >
> > I did have the documented ICMP network issues when I used the 4.9 version
> > of the backported kernel.
> >
>
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 4.9+78
The current (backported) version of linux-image-amd64 (for Jessie) appears
to need a few important fixes from the kernel source (upstream).
Please see:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406212.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402
6 matches
Mail list logo
