Modestas Vainius wrote:
Note that Debian's buildds run a UP kernel, so as soon as those fixes
go upstream we can pull them in. Thanks for all your work here!
Well, as long as this is unfixed or at least "common", I don't see how hppa
can be considered to be a release arch. Is that UP patch ava
John David Anglin wrote:
> It is interesting that in the case of the Debian bug that
> a thread of the parent process causes the COW break and thereby corrupts
> its own memory. As far as I can tell, the fork'd child never writes
> to the memory that causes the fault.
Thanks for writing and testi
Thank you for giving me URL references. I think that the criteria
looks fair enough.
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:09:55 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool, any relationship to the other ones, or some site with general
> description of it ? What is it used for ? Some sort of e
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:22:31 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is m32r a separate architecture at all ?
Yes. Original architecture by Mitsubishi, it's now Renesas Technology.
> Debian doesn't yet have archive support for it, does it ?
Yes, we have. I mean, dpkg and other
(and source) for
Linux kernel.
With this patch, M32R kernel will be able to be built well.
Thanks,
--
NIIBE Yutaka, at University of Oldenburg this week
* debian/arch/defines, debian/arch/m32r/*: Added M32R support.
-- NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Sep 2005 13:54:21 +0900
--
5 matches
Mail list logo
