Bug#648367: [dm-devel] Bug#648367: device-mapper devices such as dm-crypt always have rotational=1; should inherit "rotational" setting from underlying devices

2011-11-15 Thread Milan Broz
On 11/15/2011 05:41 PM, Josh Triplett wrote: > I didn't know about that command; very nice, thanks! lsblk confirms > that on my system, the physical disk has rotational=0 but the dm-crypt > and LVM devices have rotational=1: > > NAME ALIGNMENT MIN-IO OPT-IO PHY-SEC LOG-SEC ROTA

Bug#648367: [dm-devel] Bug#648367: device-mapper devices such as dm-crypt always have rotational=1; should inherit "rotational" setting from underlying devices

2011-11-14 Thread Milan Broz
On 11/14/2011 03:26 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: > OK, I suppose I don't actually care what rotational shows for a > device-mapper device backed by rotating media. The case I care about: > when the underlying media has rotational=0, the dm device definitely > shouldn't have rotational=1. Rotational f

Bug#582481: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#582481: initramfs-tools: System won't boot anymore if it was encrypted by debian squeeze setup

2010-05-22 Thread Milan Broz
On 05/22/2010 01:13 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote: >>> kernel-provided name 'dm-0' and NAME='/mapper/sda2_crypt' disagree, please >>> use SYMLINK+= >>> or change the kernel to provide the proper name > i strongly believe it's a udev bug. the same warnings appear on my > system since last udev upgrade.