Thorsten,
I’d like the m68k people to read the whole eMail and test
https://www.freewrt.org/~tg/dp/dists/hacks/dirty/Crossbuilt/linux/
linux-image-3.10-0+m68k.1-m68k_3.10.1-1+m68k.1_m68k.deb
on all their boxen, at least Amiga/Atari/Macintosh
Not anytime soon - the boot disk on my Falcon just
Thorsten,
the reason that the EtherNAT patch series has not been submitted to
Linus is my backlog in submitting it to linux-netdev for review. I plan
on dealing with that RSN.
There's no harm in including the Kconfig patch to enable building the
smc91x module, but there'd no gain in that eit
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
(Michael, Geert, please read below for action item.)
Michael Schmitz: I’ve changed one line in your ST-RAM patch
to avoid a trigraph (changed "??)" to "?)"). Geert, can you
please update the patch in your git? I’ve also added signoff
Looks
> > severity 407671 wishlist
> > thanks
> >
> The kernel developers didn't remove the ancient backlight code and
> installed IOC_GRAB_BACKLIGHT instead. With this ioctl a user space
> daemon can switch off the kernel backlight keys code and get full
> control over it. Unfortunately CONFIG_PMAC_BACK
> > OK, here's what I found out: The only piece that is missing from 2.6.18-8
> > (and, presumably, -7) is actually switching on the config options for
> > FB_ATARI, KEYBOARD_ATARI and MOUSE_ATARI. These options were not new,
> > that's why they never showed up in any of my patches.
>
> Your patche
> > I think I had uploaded -7 just before I left, but I could not include
> > Michaels patches, since they would not apply to my tree. The easiest thing
> > for me would be if everything is in the CVS, I would then start building
> > 2.6.19.
>
> Roman has been making noises to that effect. I've not
> d-i is currently paying (at least some) attention to amiga, atari,
> q40, *vme*, and mac.
>
> Of those, only amiga seems to be ready for a full switch to 2.6. mac
> works on some hardware.
That's been my impression. Christian has been working on 2.6 for Atari
lately though.
> To my knowledge *v
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Simon McVittie wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Forwarding my follow-up to bug 356933: since this was reported on a
> package which no longer exists, my follow-up went to the BTS but not
> to debian-kernel.
>
> Bug 358816 appears to be another repor
> > Unfortunately 2.6.12-9 had a FTBS on hppa (##330157).
> > I'll likely release -10 tomorrow, so best old off for that.
> > With a bit of luck we can produce a kernel that actually builds :-)
>
> Hi Michael, 2.6.12-10 seems to be going pretty well,
> could you kick of a build of that?
I'll fetch
> I have uploaded linux-2.6 2.6.12-9 just now, its currently in incoming
> and should get into the archive in the next day. Sven Luther asked me to
> let you know when this happens so you can kick of a cross compile on
> m68k.
Thanks; I'll discard the -8 source then and fetch -9 out of incoming.
> Michael,
>
> All I can say at this point is that it didn't work without specifying
> the kernel argument. As far as 2.6.8 goes, it didn't work period. I
> tried it with the kernel arg and it didn't work, but it did work with
> 2.6.12-rc4 and 2.6.11.8. However again, I did need to explicitly give
> > Nope, the kernel in d-i does not boot this G5. John Koskie indicated
> > (in this thread) that he has seen the same problem with newer G5
> > hardware (him and Paddy de Burca report having used d-i on similar,
> > somewhat older G5 machines with sucess though).
>
> Well, the real problem is tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
