On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:33:35 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which solution you prefer is up to you but I would be glad if at least
> > solution #1 could be realised.
>
> For now, at least, what prevents you from having all enabled and have
> pbbuttonsd still call PMU_
Hi,
I know your guys are very busy and sometimes a email got lost. Normally
I would let it run but this time debian is going to integrate a kernel
from my point of view with a grave bug and they rejected any change
because they can't see any changes in the upstream project. (see debian
bug #407671
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:51:21 +0100
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> severity 407671 wishlist
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 01:18:26PM +0100, Matthias Grimm wrote:
> > This option disables some PMU ioctls that won't be needed anymore due
> &g
Subject: linux-image-2.6-powerpc: Missing CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT_LEGACY breaks
backlight control
Package: linux-image-2.6-powerpc
Version: 2.6.18+5
Severity: grave
*** Please type your report below this line ***
In the current debian kernel 2.6.18 the option
CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT_LEGACY is not se
4 matches
Mail list logo
