On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:10:37PM +, TJ wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 12:59 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > The options are passed to it by modprobe, based on command-line parameters
> > and its configuration files, either in early userspace (initramfs) or from
>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:11:50PM +, TJ wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:21 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > The argument handling is done differently for the modular case; elsewhere in
> > the file you'll find module_param macros for that purpose.
> >
>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:33:35PM +, TJ wrote:
> I've been investigating this issue on two notebooks that have i815
> chipsets, with Ubuntu Edgy 6.10 (2.6.17-10).
>
> The reason i810fb (and most other framebuffers) isn't available at
> boot-time when compiled as a module is that the framebuf
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:38:18PM +, TJ wrote:
> I've been investigating this issue on two notebooks that have i815
> chip-sets, with Ubuntu Edgy 6.10 (2.6.17-10).
>
> I've documented my research in this Ubuntu bug report:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fbset/+bug/64666
>
> T
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:50:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:35:15AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > That isn't true any more now than it was the first time you asserted it, and
> > I've corrected you several times in other forums.
>
>
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:50:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 09:51:40AM +0200, Emanuel Steen wrote:
> > Please, don't ignore the bug report just because I'm using Ubuntu. It's the
> > same package, version 23 of mkvmlinuz in Debian. I just found it better to
> > report i
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:13:46AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > It should be removed from unstable if no one steps up to maintain it; it
> > needs to be repackaged more or less from scratch in order to migrate t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:22:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, including but
> > > not limited to things like linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6, pwc,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:13:47PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>
> > Either way, I don't think having acpid installed is enough, as long it
> > starts so late in bootup process. A long fsck run or a similar problem
> > before entering runlevel 2, an
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:47:21PM +0300, Pasi Savolainen wrote:
> On 5/2/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 03:22:49AM +0300, Pasi Savolainen wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.10-5-k7-smp
> > > Version: 2.6.10-34
> > > Severity: important
> >
> > This appe
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:44:04PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> thanks for your bug report. Sorry for the long delay in replying.
> Long inbox...
>
> I took a quick look into this. Unfortunately I can't find dm_snapshot.c
> in either the kernel tree or the evms source code tree, nor anything
> that look
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:41:51AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Understood. Would it be helpful if security patches for the 2.4 kernel
> were forwarded to the security-team as they are added to SVN for
> inclusion in unstable and thus testing?
Yes, absolutely.
> Perhaps being better about opening entri
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote:
> > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm
> > volatile("fnclex ; fwait");) has not been fixed in 2.4.18 for so long?
>
> That and a host of others.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:04:42AM -0500, Marvin Stodolsky wrote:
> Note that in in the Ubuntu packages linux-headers-2.6.8.1 and
> linux-headers-2.6.8.1-3-686
> there is assignment:
> Maintainer: Debian kernel team
> so please transfer the Bug Report to those packages
The maintainer address
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:13:14AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 10:43:30PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Is there anything further I can do to help resolve this issue? For now, I
> > am working around the problem by backing out to an older cdrecord which
>
tags 270437 patch
thanks
Herbert Xu pointed out that the problem is that growisofs opens the device
read-only, while read-write mode is necessary for some of the ioctls that it
uses. This trivial patch seems to get it working again, though I confess
the code is difficult to follow and I'm not sur
This bug is still present with 2.6.8.1, same symptoms.
--
- mdz
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:20:17AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> tags 266882 + woody security
>
> Security Team, what is going on with respect to updating 2.4.18 in
> woody? There are numerous CAN entries outstanding.
Joey has been working on it, and I have sent him what patches I had
been able to colle
Is it possible to have ACPI disabled in the kernel until acpid starts, and
enable it then? Or must this decision be made very early in the boot
process?
--
- mdz
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 01:34:27PM +0200, boud wrote:
> Is anyone working on a new security release for 2.4.18?
Joey is.
--
- mdz
Is there anything further I can do to help resolve this issue? For now, I
am working around the problem by backing out to an older cdrecord which
doesn't trigger the problem, but I would like to help solve it correctly.
Has anyone else seen this behaviour?
--
- mdz
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.71
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This trivial patch adds support for user mode linux ubd devices to mkinitrd.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
K
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:32:07PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-14 08:46]:
> > debian-kernel: Can we remove kernel-source-2.4.22 from sid yet?
>
> It has been removed from sid at the end of May.
OK, so there is no point
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:37:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.22
> Version: 2.4.22-7.um.3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: security sid patch
>
> Bug filed on request from William Lee Irwin
>
> The OSS code for the Sound Blaster driver in Linux 2.4.x does not
> properly handle ce
24 matches
Mail list logo
