Re: [RFT] [SPARC] Emulate cmpxchg like parisc

2007-05-30 Thread Martin Habets
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:59:31PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:30:45 +0100 > > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:12:33AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &

Re: [RFT] [SPARC] Emulate cmpxchg like parisc

2007-05-29 Thread Martin Habets
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:12:33AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 00:37:01 +0100 > > > Good to see someone has a crystal ball handy. So a patch like like this > > to solve the DRM issue? With it DR

Re: [RFT] [SPARC] Emulate cmpxchg like parisc

2007-05-28 Thread Martin Habets
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:49:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 01:07:46 +0100 > > > On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 03:59:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > Alternatively we can have a KCONFIG variable w

Re: [RFT] [SPARC] Emulate cmpxchg like parisc

2007-05-27 Thread Martin Habets
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 03:59:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > Alternatively we can have a KCONFIG variable with reversed > logic, like "EMULATED_CMPXCHG" which only the atomically > challenged platforms need to set. Like this idea, but if we're not going to build DRM I see no point adding the cm

Re: [RFT] [SPARC] Emulate cmpxchg like parisc

2007-05-26 Thread Martin Habets
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:00:36PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:24:40 +0100 > > > Hi Kyle, > > > > After some minor fixes this builds, and the DRM drivers also > > build again. I cannot

Re: [RFT] [SPARC] Emulate cmpxchg like parisc

2007-05-25 Thread Martin Habets
;sparc32 compiler if that would help... Thanks, Martin Acked-by: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:11:43PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > PS: Anyone have a nice prebuilt i38

Re: Intention to drop sparc32 support for Lenny

2007-05-22 Thread Martin Habets
00, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 21 May 2007 21:49, Martin Habets wrote: > > FYI, 2.6.21 is rock solid on my SS20 here. Do you consider it broken > > just because of some cdrom issues? Or is there more? > > I don't have more details than this: > http://lists.d