Am 06.06.2012 01:08, schrieb Marcus Osdoba:
Recently I tried to cross compile a kernel (package) with "make
ARCH= CROSS_COMPILE=- deb-pkg
That worked well for 2.6.32 kernels from squeeze. But the 3.2 kernels
from wheezy/backports fail with:
[..]
Since cross compiling (pacakges) is pos
Am 04.06.2012 23:30, schrieb Arnaud Patard (Rtp):
One should never draw conclusions in bug reports, but when browsing
the kernel config posted for the original vexpress wish (#670462),
there is an nfsrootfs configured in CMDLINE option. So I guess the
requestor checked that with a rootfs over net
Hello,
Recently I tried to cross compile a kernel (package) with "make
ARCH= CROSS_COMPILE=- deb-pkg
That worked well for 2.6.32 kernels from squeeze. But the 3.2 kernels
from wheezy/backports fail with:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'powerpc|armel' does
not appear in p
Hello Mailinglist,
I'm not sure, if this is worth a bug report, but recnetly I tried to
boot a multistrapped wheezy armhf system in qemu from squeeze-backports.
The qemu command line included the -hda option but the vexpress kernel
wasn't able to find /dev/sda or /dev/hda.
The system droppe
Hi,
I encountered the same problem with one of the last 3.2 kernels from
backports on my squeeze server installation (node B).
The system has two rtl interfaces - a gigabit on board and a 100Mbit as
PCI card.
r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: RTL8168b/8111b at 0xc960e000,
00:18:f3:21:XX:YY,
Am 24.01.2012 16:00, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 13:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 08:16 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
I have found linux-2.6 in the bpo upload Q today. Thanks for this.
Please keep cpufrequtils-007-2 for kernels>= 3.0 in mind.
I w
I guess this is done since 3.0.0~rc1-1~experimental.1 ?
linux-2.6 (3.0.0~rc1-1~experimental.1) experimental; urgency=low
* cgroups: Disable memory resource controller by default. Allow it
to be enabled using kernel parameter 'cgroup_enable=memory'.
[...]
* cgroups: Enable CGROUP_MEM_RES_
Am 18.01.2012 04:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
cpufrequtils (007-2)
A separate build-container for each architecture was used to be sure,
that there are only stable packages installed. I reverted the compiler
back to gcc 4.4. Cpufrequtils is needed for newer kernels to have the
cpufreq modules work
Am 18.01.2012 05:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 03:42 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 00:40 +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
[...]
Now that I finished with building up
[...]
linux-image-3.1.0-1-486_3.1.8-2~bpo60+1_i386.deb
This is wrong; modules built for
Am 19.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
Please keep linux-2.6 up-to-date in backports [..]
Hello debian kernel maintainers,
I've created a private backport of kernel 3.1.8 from testing for i386/amd64.
The packages I considered are:
linux-image-amd64
linux-image-i386-686-pae
linux-image-i
Am 10.01.2012 02:42, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
We need to make a decision soon on whether we will use Linux 3.2 for
wheezy or wait for a later release. Whichever one we choose, we need to
make sure someone (possibly one of us) maintains a longterm branch for
it. I am strongly disinclined to choose
The loopback is not only suitable for installing on a windows FS.
I use it to put an ext3 image on a vfat sd card in my Wii, since
homebrew apps are only able to handle vfat. So I'm not forced to change
the sdcard or partition it.
http://gitorious.org/dockstar/emdebian-multistrap/blobs/master/
@Jonathan: Thanks for the hint.
@Ben: Take my excuses, I didn't notice the cloning step.
This bug could be marked as a duplicate of bug#637395. I installed
cpufreq-utils 007-2 from testing and the problems went away.
The kernel itself booted fine, so I won't send the output of the
netconsole.
Hi Ben,
The original Bug#649211 described an issue with missing
sysfs/cputopology in the 486 kernel. Since the problem still exists, I
prefer to keep it open as its origin.
Basically I see two solutions:
The 486 kernel varaint should publish cputopology in sysfs, too.
(Someday more 686 users
Am 18.11.2011 23:55, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:25:39PM +0100, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
Package: linux-image-486
Version: 3.1.1
Severity: important
Hi,
I have tested virt-manager on my Debian Squeeze on several installations.
Unfortunatly it does not work with 486 variant of
Package: linux-image-486
Version: 3.1.1
Severity: important
Hi,
I have tested virt-manager on my Debian Squeeze on several installations.
Unfortunatly it does not work with 486 variant of the kernel [1]. When running
the 686 variant, the topology is found in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/ , but
not
Am 06.09.2011 06:38, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
I've now tested upgrading from squeeze to squeeze-backports kernel
package in a VM, with the results:
# apt-get install linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-pae
Fails, complaining that initramfs-tools will be broken.
# apt-get install linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-pae
Am 22.08.2011 20:32, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote:
I am running into a similar isue with 2.6.39.2. amd64.
I decided to install 2.6.39.2 from backports (apt-get install ...)
I rebooted, and got a kernel panic about not being able to f
Am 13.07.2011 03:41, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 23:05 +0200, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
Am 12.07.2011 01:43, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
The commands on a recent amd64 Squeeze were:
linux-src#>sudo make-kpkg --initrd --cross-compile powerpc-linux-gnu-
--arch powerpc --append-to-vers
Am 12.07.2011 01:43, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
Please explain exactly how you are building the kernel with a
different entry point (config changes and commands).
Hi Ben, many thanks for the answer.
I'm working with the debian sources on patchlevel 31 as base and applied
the mikep5 patch [1]. I als
Hello Mailinglist,
I recently experimented with building kernels based on squeeze's
patchlevel. The target (Wii, a powerpc flavor) is not that important for
the next question:
What is the currently preferred solution for building kernel packages -
make-kpkg or deb-pkg?
The FAQ proposes make-
21 matches
Mail list logo
