But these (642380 also) were OpenVZ, not UML...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201109301635.32894.l...@dashjr.org
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:21:30 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Looking at the OpenVZ patch for the RHEL 6 kernel (which is what
> Parallels is selling), I see that ext4 has been added to the accepted
> list and doesn't require special handling. So I think we could add it
> in Debian.
Thanks.
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 10:55:42 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> If OpenVZ doesn't support migration of ext4, you'll have to use another
> filesystem for the containers.
According to http://openvz.org/pipermail/users/2008-January/001669.html , this
is a meaningless check (in kernel/cpt/cpt_fil
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64
Within Virtual Environments (VEs) only...
The conntrack userland tool gets "Connection refused" on the netlink socket
required to interact (list, flush, etc) with connection tracking. The old
procfs interface is no longer supported in 2.6.32.
P.S. Is t
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64
*** Please type your report below this line ***
# vzctl chkpnt 132
Setting up checkpoint...
suspend...
Can not suspend container: Invalid argument
Error: unsupported fs type ext4
Checkpointing failed
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux v
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:20:17 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:06:24AM -0400, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:41:05 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I understand this and found a patch that should fix it.
> >
> > Is thi
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:41:05 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I understand this and found a patch that should fix it.
Is this a security vulnerability, or am I safe to assume my system was not
exploited at least through this issue?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.de
7 matches
Mail list logo
