Bug#703142: compatibility with alx ?

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 02:07 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > [Re-sending to the correct list address.] >> > >> > On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 16:24

Bug#703142: compatibility with alx ?

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > [Re-sending to the correct list address.] > > On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 16:24 +0100, Camaleón wrote: >> El 2013-03-17 a las 14:58 +, Ben Hutchings escribió: >> >> > On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:46 +0100, Camaleón wrote: >> >> (...) >> >> > > Usin

Bug#664461: [squeeze] atl1c: AR8152: "transmit queue 0 timed out" and network is unusable until reset

On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:16:14PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > >> FWIW we already provide daily backports of code through compat-wireless. > >> compat-wireless will eventually be changed to "compat-d

Bug#664461: [squeeze] atl1c: AR8152: "transmit queue 0 timed out" and network is unusable until reset

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:28:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 02:14 +, Huang, Xiong wrote: > > Hi Jonathan > > > > For driver atl1c, we add many patches recently. Please sync with > > the kernel, the last patch is > > 80bcb4238dd858d atl1c: remove PHY polling fro

Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> > Use of the GPL o

Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:40:44PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code >> >

Re: [PATCH] module,bug: Add TAINT_OOT_MODULE flag for modules not built in-tree

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Use of the GPL or a compatible licence doesn't necessarily make the code > any good.  We already consider staging modules to be suspect, and this > should also be true for out-of-tree modules which may receive very > little review. > > Signed

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote: >> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference? >> If I'm understanding the question correctl

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kel Modderman wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote: >> > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: >> > >> >> FWIW, I don&#

Re: [RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

44a6c68790adc45d4a047cdd3a93332210c17 Author: Johannes Berg Date: Sat Jan 24 15:35:30 2009 +0100 RTFM link for ap/master modes commit 0c099f3edd23586680e700dbe16a484b0d0568f9 Author: Johannes Berg Date: Sat Jan 24 15:15:46 2009 +0100 add commas to see also section commit 585e6

[RFH] Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

ist. [1] http://josefsson.org/git2cl/git2cl [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-wpa-devel/2010-January/002415.html If anyone has any questions please let me know. On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:19 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: &

Re: linux-firmware-nonfree: Add prism54 softmac firmware

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Chase Douglas wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 12:02 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Chase Douglas >> wrote: >> > I have uploaded a new version of the linux-firmware-nonfree package to: >> &

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > >> > I don't really like that it merges the two packages. I don't think that >

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> And after reviewing this again, I conclude Kel already did all the >> work :) So any mentors / DDs willing to take his package up? >> >> I thi

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman wrote: >>> On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 201

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman wrote: >> On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote: >>> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > Also, it seems that the REGDB_CHANGED stuff in wireless-regdb/Makefile >> > does not >> > work as expected - the sha1sum.txt file p

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman wrote: > On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote: >> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > >> >> I can help

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally >> however find building a key on the fly for each build pretty pointless >> and would l

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Given the OpenSSL stuff in crda 1.1.1, I don't think there are any > technical roadblocks before crda/wireless-regdb can be uploaded to > Debian (once the packaging

Re: Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > [Please keep me in CC for this thread] > > There is a technical change coming in Debian that may mean one key for > the pkg-wpa folks will be more problematic; it is planned that > maintainer-built .debs are to be thrown away on upload (but still

Debian 2.6.32 CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY, wireless-regdb and crda

Hey folks, I wanted to try to help Debian in ways in which I can with the new regulatory infrastructure upstream on the Linux kernel. As of recent (>= 2.6.34) the old regulatory stuff has been deprecated and replaced completely for CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB, the old regulatory framework was also dis

Bug#558740: Push of AR9170 1-stage firmware to linux-firmware?

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:40:38PM -0800, Geoff Simmons wrote: > Hi Luis, > > Are you still considering a push of the AR9170 1-stage firmware to > linux-firmware, as per your previous intention? [1] Well so I was hoping more people would test the GPL based firmware and instead support that [1]. B

Bug#481234: Where to get firmware for p54 driver?

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Sam Morris wrote: > Does anyone know where the firmware for the p54 driver comes from? > > It seems to live at , but there is no > statement about the origin of those files, nor their copyright or > licensing status. I've tried contact

Bug#465775: Not a bug

This is not a bug in the kernel but a udev problem. If you delete the generated rename rules, it should create the correct ones on the next boot. Alternately, you could add: ATTRS{type}="1" selector to your current rule. Debian puts these autogenerated udev rules in /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persiste