tin Martin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:50:44AM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.144
Followup-For: Bug #1079150
Sadly, it is unable to regenerate the initramfs properly due to a different
problem related to the reiserfsprogs hook.
```
/etc/kernel/
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.144
Followup-For: Bug #1079150
X-Debbugs-Cc: josel.seg...@gmx.es
Dear Maintainer,
I was facing this problem and in order to avoid it, I updated initramfs-tools
to the latest version.
Sadly, it is unable to regenerate the initramfs properly due to a different
p
Source: linux-signed-amd64
Version: 6.6.9+1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +--
Source: iproute2
Version: 6.4.0-1
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
(dpkg-buildpack
Source: linux
Version: 6.4.4-3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
(dpkg-buildpackage
to
load cirrus/cs35l41-dsp1-spk-prot.wmfw (-2)
Lucas
Source: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.140
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enterin
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.2.9-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I believe I have found a hardware-related bug in the MacBookPro11.5. The bug is
a white area that covers almost all graphical applications in both Xorg and
Wayland, with the exception of small windows that take up less than 1
Hi,
On 15/03/21 at 09:07 +0900, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> > According to strace, it fails because /dev/dri does not exist.
>
> When vc4.ko is not loaded, /dev/dri does not exist.
> If vc4.ko is loaded, /dev/dri exists. Could you make sure that
> vc
ng is that 5.10 does not have DRI support for the RPI4.
There's still some work to do in the V3D driver for that (see the
discussion at the end of
https://github.com/lategoodbye/rpi-zero/issues/46 )
Lucas
On 17/12/20 at 13:49 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:09:55 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Outside of the kernel, there's nothing else needed.
>
> What I haven't seen mentioned thus far and is AFAIUI essential, is the
> following line in
you also have the
issue?
Lucas
i4#Building_a_custom_kernel_from_github.com.2Fraspberrypi.2Flinux_sources
Lucas
On 04/11/20 at 09:09 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Outside of the kernel, there's nothing else needed.
OK, this is not entirely true: you also need support in Mesa, which is
not available on buster, but is available in testing. Things are still
moving in that area, see for examp
lategoodbye/rpi-zero/issues/46
github issue providing good background information about accelerated
graphics on RPI4/mainline kernel.
Lucas
On 10/08/20 at 19:01 +0900, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 5.7.10-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
&
Source: linux
Version: 5.7.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200709 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:/<>/debian/build/build-tool
Source: linux
Version: 5.6.14-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx3.1
Hi,
linux fails to build with Sphinx 3.1, currently available in
experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/debian/build/build-do
Source: linux
Version: 5.6.7-1
Hi,
Please enable CONFIG_BCM2711_THERMAL (Support for thermal sensors on
Broadcom BCM2711 SoCs). This is used by the Raspberry Pi 4.
example output:
# cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp
41868
- Lucas
revious one.
>
> I do believe this is the problem. I just tested with 'cma=64M' on the
> command line, like raspi-firmware wants to put there, and it fails to
> load the mmc driver too:
Thanks! Indeed it works now.
I'll make sure that this gets fixed into raspi-firmware at some point.
Lucas
it fixed by enabling
CONFIG_PCIE_BRCMSTB, or is that a different issue?
Thanks,
Lucas
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
On 01/09/19 at 00:51 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Version bnx2x/bnx2x-e2-7.13.11.0.fw is available upstream according to
> https://github.com/wkennington/linux-firmware/commit/8fcf0ec44c11f1865f8451c0265e84bf16365312
> but not included in firmware-bnx2x.
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.19.67-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Simply using debian for a few minutes will lead to my Samsung 960 EVO 256gb
NVME M2 to enter read only mode. I also tested with a Samsung 512gb PM961 SSD
NVME M2 and I get the exact same problem, so the problem is not on t
bnx2x/bnx2x-e2-7.13.11.0.fw is available upstream according to
https://github.com/wkennington/linux-firmware/commit/8fcf0ec44c11f1865f8451c0265e84bf16365312
but not included in firmware-bnx2x.
Could you please update the package to include it?
Thanks!
Lucas
On 02/09/17 at 23:46 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This kernel fails to boot on a Olimex A20 board.
>
> The HDMI output just runs black. I tried to use netconsole but it's in too
> early boot. I don't have a serial console for that device. I'll try t
ecording of the output tomorrow. (it was unreadable without using
boot_delay)
The jessie 3.16 kernel worked fine.
Kernel 3.10 failed to boot with the same(?) problem.
Kernel 3.11 and 3.12 worked fine.
- Lucas
Here is the output of a *successful* boot with kernel 4.12:
[0.00] Booting Li
Source: linux
Version: 4.11.11-1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170807 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[8]: Enteri
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
On 29/12/16 at 17:14 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It seems simple enough... can you try the attached patch?
I can confirm that the patch fixes the problem. Thanks!
Lucas
lx4 driver.
Thanks
Lucas
ems) is to not install lvm2 if that is an option.
Lucas
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.16.0-4-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version
4.8.4 (Debian 4.8.4-1) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03)
** Command line:
root=/dev/sda3 console=tty0 console=tty
nings being treated as errors
> mv: cannot stat
> '/<>/debian/build/tools/perf/out/util/.event.o.tmp': No such
> file or directory
> /<>/tools/build/Makefile.build:77: recipe for target
> '/<>/debian/build/tools/perf/out/util/event.o' failed
> mak
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Attempted to use google hangouts for audio call on a desktop machine
with Debian 8 (KDE)
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffectiv
On 10/09/15 at 14:04 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 10 septembre 2015 13:56 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum :
>
> >> > Dmesg output during the hangs:
> >> > [ 876.069592] e1000e :00:19.0 eth0: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
> >>
> >> You ca
On 10/09/15 at 13:51 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 10 septembre 2015 09:35 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum :
>
> > Dmesg output during the hangs:
> > [ 876.069592] e1000e :00:19.0 eth0: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
>
> You can try disabling some of the offloading funct
[ 884.074531] ---[ end trace dd1fa79f5fc57ebf ]---
[ 884.074672] e1000e :00:19.0 eth0: Reset adapter unexpectedly
[ 887.885081] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control:
None
There's another mention of this problem at
https://communities.intel.com/thread/70244, b
Uw pagina vertaald in 11 talen
Automatisch en zonder enige vertaling of handeling van uw kant uit.
Meer informatie : http://www.request4test-2014.eu/
-
Niet nuttig ?
Om uw adres onmiddellijk en permanent te verwijderen :
http:
On 20/07/13 at 23:34 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi Lucas.
>
> I think it cannot harm (even if we don't need it right now and although
> the whole thing is anyway just voluntary), that debian registers it's
> name at the "EFI System Partition
On 09/14/2012 09:45 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 15:13:02 +0400, Lucas wrote:
I am trying to find out what can cause unusable screen picture on my
Sandybridge Chipset
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 2nd
Generation Core Processor Family
I am trying to find out what can cause unusable screen picture on my
Sandybridge Chipset
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family
Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0102] (rev 09)
I compared outputs of lsmod from Ubuntu (3.2.0-25), Fed
build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/firmware-free_3_lsid64.buildlog
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild:
roposed experiment. By not
upgrading the kernel in testing, you will limit the amount of testing
that the new kernel will receive. That could, in turn, cause more bugs
to be found late in the wheezy release process, making it harder to
reach a newer stable kernel.
Or are you suggesting that we stay with 2.6.32 forever? ;)
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110220072432.ga7...@xanadu.blop.info
.6.32 remains in testing for a
> while. This will allow it to get updates in sync with stable kernel
> security updates (without any additional effort by Dann, Moritz, and
> other kernel team members other than the package upload to testing as
> well).
You base your reasoning on the assumption that CUT users prefer a more
stable kernel to a more recent kernel. I'm tempted to think the
opposite.
- lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110219064759.ga30...@xanadu.blop.info
severity 601962 important
thanks
On 31/10/10 at 15:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:46:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Removing linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 in a clean chroot fails:
> > # apt-get remove --purge linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
> &g
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101031114655.ga8...@xanadu.blop.info
you consider backporting the fix it to stable, so the
buildds could be fixed?
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100907072615.ga12...@xanadu.blop.info
ea) and RHEL kernels, at least.
Thanks
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100601141830.6198.74986.report...@beothuk
lders.
Hi Debian-kernel,
How do you plan to proceed?
Are you planning to provide debuginfo packages before the squeeze
release, or only for squeeze+1?
I'd need to know to adjust my efforts on adopting systemtap.
Thanks,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nuss
[ Adding ftpmasters to To: ]
On 05/03/10 at 19:34 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I wonder what we (as Debian) could do about it. Would it make sense to
> > sponsor a very fast machine that the kernel team could u
ke-kpkg -j 16 --append-to-version +kprobes --revision=1 --initrd binary-arch
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
sers are required to
build their own kernel to use systemtap, so I think that we should try
to support it, at least for some kernel flavors and some
architectures.
Kernel, buildd and mirror people, what do you think?
Thanks,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nuss
a lot of archive space
(~300MiB per arch), and space on the buildd while building (> 2GiB))
It's pretty sad, because Debian is currently the only major distro where
systemtap doesn't work out of the box.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| ja
ssing
> tp-smapi-source: missing
> virtualbox-ose-source: missing
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> E: Couldn't find package linux-support-2.6.30-2
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/12/10/linux-modules-extra-2
On 08/12/09 at 00:30 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:04:58AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> > Version: 2.6.25-6
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My Dell laptop, a Latitu
GiB is quite a lot
> > of space, but I don't see that it would overload the buildd
> > infrastructure.
>
> Per flavour. We had up to 8 in the past per architecture. So the build
> needs up to 30GiB of space.
>
> > Perhaps this can happen on Debian hardware as Lu
x27;s documentation in
Documentation/x86/x86_64/fake-numa-for-cpusets
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
sn't very well known inside Debian). Have you thought of using
Debian hardware to build them? That doesn't sound like a totally insane
idea to me.
- Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
he kernel side are:
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, CONFIG_KPROBES, CONFIG_RELAY, CONFIG_DEBUG_FS,
CONFIG_MODULES, CONFIG_MODULES_UNLOAD
(source:
http://sources.redhat.com/git/?p=systemtap.git;a=blob_plain;f=README;hb=HEAD)
So the only missing options are CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO and CONFIG_KPROBES.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-n
On 14/07/09 at 09:47 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > What's the status on the addition of a "debuginfo" package in addition
> > to linux-image-*? Is it just waiting on someone to do the work, and is
> &g
ian/linux-doc-2.6.30/usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.30/html'
> bash: line 3: cpio: command not found
> make[2]: *** [install-doc] Error 127
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/07/13/linux-2.6_2.6.30-2_lsid64.buildlog
A list of current common pr
sing
> lzma-source: missing
> nilfs2-source: missing
> speakup-source: missing
> drbd8-source: missing
> tp-smapi-source: missing
> virtualbox-ose-source: missing
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> E: Couldn't find package linux-support-2.6.29-2
The full b
-- just install the debuginfo package. ah, except on Debian,
where you need to rebuild the kernel."
In Ubuntu, it has apparently been added in Hardy, and each debug package
takes ~25 MB. See
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/2.6.24-16.30/+build/559500
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@
< initrd.img-2.6.29-1-amd64.867 | cpio -t |grep bnx
lib/modules/2.6.29-1-amd64/kernel/drivers/net/bnx2.ko
lib/firmware/bnx2-06-4.4.1.fw
38593 blocks
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
it's
unfortunate that linux-headers-* isn't installable.
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On 18/07/08 at 09:23 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > reassign 491057 acpi-support 0.109-5
> > clone 491057 -1
> > reassign -1 pm-utils 1.1.2.3-1
> > thanks
>
> Usually, suspend/resume should not require anything fro
reassign 491057 acpi-support 0.109-5
clone 491057 -1
reassign -1 pm-utils 1.1.2.3-1
thanks
On 16/07/08 at 10:04 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> Version: 2.6.25-6
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> My Dell laptop, a Latitude D610, no longe
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
Version: 2.6.25-6
Severity: important
Hi,
My Dell laptop, a Latitude D610, no longer resumes with kernel 2.6.25.
During resume, there's some hard disk activity, but the screen never
turns on. I don't think that the system started normally (ie, that it's
only a s
On 07/05/08 at 12:24 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 07/05/08 at 11:09 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > severity 479899 normal
> > thanks
> >
> > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:22:55AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > It seems like netfilter.h should inc
On 07/05/08 at 11:09 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> severity 479899 normal
> thanks
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:22:55AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > It seems like netfilter.h should include linux/types.h. In 2.6.25-1, the
> > following was added to it:
>
&
't find package linux-support-2.6.24-1
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/05/06
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the
DNS_LOOKUPS -DLOG_FAULTS_TO_SYSLOG -DLOG_TO_FILE
-DLOG_TO_FILE_LINEBUFF -DIPTABLES -DTCP_WRAPPERS -c tproxy.c -o tproxy.o
In file included from /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4.h:8,
from tproxy.c:53:
/usr/include/linux/netfilter.h:40: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before '_
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 2.6.25-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
/usr/include/asm/page.h is no longer included in linux-libc-dev, causing
15 packages to FTBFS.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
> Reading state information...
> E: Couldn't find package linux-headers-2.6.22-3-all-i386
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skip
install newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping linux-latest-2.6
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/01/01
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.
: [PROPOSAL] common interface for parallel building
in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS) for details.
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
p-base] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
The full build log is available from
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/10/21
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . Yo
lcd4linux-0.10.1~rc2/udelay.c:187: undefined reference to
> > `rdtscl'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[2]: *** [lcd4linux] Error 1
rdtscl is not defined anywhere except in /usr/include/asm-x86_64/msr.h.
I would have expected it to be defined on i386 when asm/msr.h is included.
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
d log is available from
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/08/06
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nuss
bug. If it's not fixed in
2.6.18, something about it should really go into the release notes,
because it's probably going to hurt very badly somebody doing a remote
upgrade. (I just got hurt by it, so I now what I'm talking about ;)
Regards,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 341567 =
thanks
Rah, I typoed the bug number in the Changelog. Reopening.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
+
> Jonathan Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > is there any intention of turning the SATA ATAPI features on now? It
> > would be very nice if all us SATA laptops could see our CD-ROMs under
> > linux on my laptop.
>
> Uh, read access to *your* CD
Hi Kernel Packaging team,
is there any intention of turning the SATA ATAPI features on now? It
would be very nice if all us SATA laptops could see our CD-ROMs under
linux on my laptop.
According to http://linux.yyz.us/sata/software-status.html:
"ATAPI support
ATAPI devices are now supported on
> Rest assured, as soon as we start shipping a kernel that Jeff feels
> can run SATA ATAPI, we will turn it on - well, someone might have
> to remind us, things do slip through the craks. But right now
> its an upstream issue. I'm tagging it as such in the BTS.
> And other than working with upstram
OK, I've had a look at this bug report. It might be the same, it might
not. 268352 reports that radeonfb has never worked in 2.6.x. 269953 says
it worked up to 2.6.5 inclusive (I can still prove that it works in 2.6.5,
as I've kept the package as a fallback.)
Also, I remember in the kernel meailing
zy1 kernel: [drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process
3657 using kernel context 0
J
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 18:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 03:07:35PM +0100, Jonathan Lucas wrote:
> > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
> > Version: 2.6.8-2
> > Severity: important
> &
I forgot to mention: this bug also applies to 2.6.7 and 2.6.6, but not 2.6.5.
cheers,
Jonathan
"It is always the best policy to tell the truth, unless, of course, you
are an exceptionally good liar" Jerome K. Jerome
Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> Thank you for the problem report you hav
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-k7
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: important
When booting up, the display goes completely blank about halfway through
the boot process, only returning when X starts. Even after X starts, the
console ttys are blank.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers
85 matches
Mail list logo
