load the firmware package and see if that causes the problem as
it is the one package I have not reinstalled.
On 04/07/2012 08:22 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Kieron Gillespie wrote:
With a completely clean install of Debian and every major version of
the Linux kernel I haven't run into
04/06/2012 10:46 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Kieron Gillespie wrote:
I am right now testing one major kernel version at a time, and on
the 3.0.0-1 I got
Just to be clear, if each time you test the version halfway between
the newest known-good and oldest known-bad kernel then you only have
to
766 linux-2.6/3.3-1~experimental.1
tags 648766 + upstream
quit
Kieron Gillespie wrote:
Now with that said I can't seem to crash the 2.6.32 kernel in the
same way with SMP off, haven't tried with SMP on yet, but I have a
feeling that will work fine as well. So this seems like it's so
seems like a real kernel bug.
-Kieron
On 04/03/2012 01:29 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Kieron Gillespie wrote:
Here are the dmesg output from the current system running Linux
3.2.13 with SMP enabled with tickless disabled.
Great.
Is this reproducible without nouveau? It might be possible
han Nieder wrote:
Kieron Gillespie wrote:
Here are the dmesg output from the current system running Linux
3.2.13 with SMP enabled with tickless disabled.
Great.
Is this reproducible without nouveau? It might be possible to test
by putting
blacklist nouveau
in /etc/modprobe.d/
au]
[ 88.193449] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[105595a8]
nv_wo32+0xb0/0xbc [nouveau]
[ 88.291832] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[105595a8]
nv_wo32+0xb0/0xbc [nouveau]
On 04/03/2012 12:02 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
severity 648766 important
quit
Kieron Gillespie wrote:
I've a
So I have obtain a similar error again, this time CPU1 locked up though.
Once again all I have are images of the crash, I am still trying to set
up a serial connection so I can log these errors better. I am right now
trying out different configuration options in the kernel to see if one
of the
7 matches
Mail list logo
