Hi,
Without this kernel module shipped, users of X1 gen6 are forced to compile,
which is significantly more taxing than just having to unblacklist the
module.
Can't it be shipped, yet added to the default blacklist, until the Yoga X11e
issue is resolved?
(It goes without saying that it's already
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:30:48PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> LOCATIONOFFSET COUNT
> net_tx_action 0 1
>
> qdisc tbf 20: parent 1:2 rate 2Kbit burst 20Kb lat 429
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 04:08:12PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 15:33 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:58:07PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > > > How do I debug this further?
> > > > >
> > > >
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:58:07PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > How do I debug this further?
> > >
> > > You could try using the perf dropmonitor script as I described on my bug
> > > report.
> >
> > Didn't you say that was also broken? :)
> [...]
>
> It's fixed now.
Hmm. Googling says i
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 02:06:57PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 12:56 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:33:02PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:23:21PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > >
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:23:21PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > tc qdisc add dev $iface_Internet parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf rate 20mbit
> > buffer 20480 limit 16384
> >
> > However, the upgrade to this new kernel appears to have killed it - the tbf
> > rule is causing outgoing HTTP connections
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:33:02PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:23:21PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > tc qdisc add dev $iface_Internet parent 1:2 handle 20: tbf rate 20mbit
> > > buffer 20480 limit 16384
> > >
> > > However, th
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
Version: 3.2.46-1
Hi,
I have a gateway machine, with $iface_Internet == xenbr2 and $iface_intranet
== xenbr0, running these traffic control rules on the outside interface
which are supposed to be a trivial ToS match and a limit on 20 Mbps:
tc qdisc del dev $ifa
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:35:44AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > OK, I can install both (it's got PV-GRUB), which do you prefer to test
> > first?
> > I'm asking because it'll likely take a few weeks for the bug to appear,
> > judging by what it did before.
>
> Probably at this stage I would be
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:27:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 00:22 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
>
> This is in a guest, right? Is it possible to try the non-Xen amd64
> flavour? I forget the exact status in Squeez
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 03:13:06AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 08:56 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > I appear to be experiencing a serious problem with a 768 MB RAM Xen domU
> > > machine running an NFS client - every now and then (for months now), ofte
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:59:17AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I appear to be experiencing a serious problem with a 768 MB RAM Xen domU
> machine running an NFS client - every now and then (for months now), often
> in the middle of the night, it enters some kind of a broken state wher
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:04:26AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:30:28AM +0200, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote:
> > Josip, this is a different issue from the one addressed with the patch.
> >
> > 1) Can you try it on a 3.2 kernel ?
>
> I can try
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:30:28AM +0200, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote:
> Josip, this is a different issue from the one addressed with the patch.
>
> 1) Can you try it on a 3.2 kernel ?
I can try that too, I'll let you know how it went.
(Unfortunately the machine is in the same room with a crib, so
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:21:34PM +0200, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote:
> This patch fixes an issue introduced after commit 4ea5454203d991ec
>
> After that commit, hid-core silently discards any incoming packet
> that arrives while any hid driver's probe function is being executed.
I managed to test
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote:
>
> > Take a look at this thread ... where a patch was published ...
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/958174
> >
> > Your issue may come from the same problem.
> >
> > I
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:46:29AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
>
> It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the introduction of
> CONFIG_HID_
Control: retitle -1 AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with Linux
3.2 (regression from 3.1)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I'll try to bisect this now with my config.
It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the in
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:27:12PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 02:42:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 10:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:52:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > auto
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 02:42:38PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 10:45 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:52:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > auto vlan2
> > > iface vlan2 inet manual
> > > vlan-raw-device
Hi,
I had removed the igb-based eth0 from the bonding interface, and the machine
was running fine with it, but when the time had come to get some Xen domUs
running on it, it failed miserably on me once again.
The updated setup is:
auto bond0
iface bond0 inet manual
slaves eth2
bond_mode acti
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:29:38AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I would like to take this upstream now, but first I need to check
> whether it has already been fixed after 2.6.32. Please can you test the
> current kernel package from testing, unstable or squeeze-backports
> (linux-image-3.2.0-2-a
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:22:37AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 12:40 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:09:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I bet this is due to the combination of LRO plus bridging. We try to
> > > tu
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:09:56AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I bet this is due to the combination of LRO plus bridging. We try to
> turn off LRO in devices under a bridge, but that won't work if there's
> an intermediate bonding device.
>
> If you run:
>
> # ethtool -K eth0 lro off
> # ethto
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-41
Hi,
The machine is a new IBM x3550 M3, with this network hardware:
% lspci | grep Ethernet
0b:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 20)
0b:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporatio
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:42:38PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-28 at 01:49 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > This clock jump by 2999 seconds also happened here, so per:
> >
> > http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-02/msg01557.html
&g
This clock jump by 2999 seconds also happened here, so per:
http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-02/msg01557.html
we switched to clocksource=pit in /etc/default/grub's $GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN on
the dom0. This seemed to have avoided the problem, but since then, the clock
jumps
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:14:12AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 17:10 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64
> > Version: 2.6.32-31
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > /boot/config-2.6.32-5-sparc64 does not include CONFIG
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-sparc64
Version: 2.6.32-31
Hi,
/boot/config-2.6.32-5-sparc64 does not include CONFIG_SERIAL_8250
or SERIAL_8250_PCI, so it's impossible to use PCI cards with serial ports
on them, which is useful for accessing e.g. serial consoles of other
machines from a sparc machi
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-23~bpo50+1
Hi,
Something like this was mentioned misplaced in #592497, and about a
different network driver, so I'm filing a new bug because it should
be unrelated to both issues over there :)
I've just seen something similar with a tg3, ra
forcemerge 596635 598057
thanks
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:34:28AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We know; this is already going to be fixed:
>
> * [x86/xen] Disable netfront's smartpoll mode by default. (Closes: #596635)
Sorry, I didn't check the applicable bug list before sending, because of
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-23
Hi,
I just witnessed a strange situation - a domU had its kernel updated from
2.6.32-4-amd64 to 2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-amd64, and all seemed well, but after
two hours it stopped responding on its (statically configured) eth0 device.
tcpdump of
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:44:50PM -0700, Giridhar Malavali wrote:
> Thanks for letting us know about this problem. Can u please provide logs
> with ql2xextended_error_logging enabled. Also, can u please provide more
> details about the test case.
OK. The machine has this hardware:
% sudo lspci -
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-21~bpo50+1
Hi,
Got this in dmesg on a server:
Sep 18 02:46:52 birdun kernel: [387093.744649] qla2xxx_eh_abort(5): aborting sp
8801b58013c0 from RISC. pid=46881441.
Sep 18 02:46:56 birdun kernel: [387093.836909] BUG: unable to handle kernel
NULL pointer de
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 07:29:13PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Josip Rodin
> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:31:37 +0200
>
> > David, can you please queue this sunxvr500.c post-2.6.32 bugfix
> > to sta...@kernel.org?
> >
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/ke
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:49:06PM +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-21
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> I'm getting the same error and kernel log as mentioned in
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sparc/13092 for which there is
> a patch at htt
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 09:45:45PM -0400, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:13:45AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.32-9
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:24:37PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > >
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:11:15PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > OK, that works, thanks. We have got to get this documented somewhere
> > now that the deprecated option is broken. There is no mention of it at
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Xen and simple googling is far from conclusive.
>
> Would you
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:28:28PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > What was the last known working version?
> > The one from lenny. Well, for some values of "working" at least :)
>
> Well, Lenny have two variants. The early pv-ops and the oldstyle one.
We had early pvops in lenny? Where? :)
>
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:56:25AM +0100, joy wrote:
> [0.610445] blkfront: xvda1: barriers enabled
> done.
> Begin: Mounting root file system ... Begin: Running /scripts/local-top ...
> done.
> Begin: Waiting for root file system ...
>
> Can anything be done? I thought the domUs were suppose
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:02:01PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> xen-blkfront is a module in the pvops based 2.6.32-x-xen-amd64 where as
> it was statically linked in the non-pvops 2.6.26-x-xen-and64 images.
> This already happened in Lenny for 32 bit guests (sort of) since the
> -686-bigmem kernel
Hi,
If I try to boot 2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 on a 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 (lenny) dom0,
it gets stuck at:
[0.120653] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vbd/769
[0.120658] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vif/0
[0.120663] XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0
[0.120679]
/b
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:09:45AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > IIRC these kernels require a newer hypervisor than is in stable at the
> > > moment, at a minimum you need 3.4.3, RC's are available in testing.
>
> > The new paravirt_ops Xen dom0 kernel packages should probably simply have a:
>
Ian Campbell wrote:
> IIRC these kernels require a newer hypervisor than is in stable at the
> moment, at a minimum you need 3.4.3, RC's are available in testing.
I'd just like to confirm this, I distinctly recall seeing the mention of
the exact Mercurial changeset on the xen-devel list for a new
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:52:34AM +0100, joy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:05:53PM +0100, joy wrote:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xen/stable
>
> It's great to see the new packages :) I didn't want to rain on the parade by
> instantly f
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:05:53PM +0100, joy wrote:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xen/stable
It's great to see the new packages :) I didn't want to rain on the parade by
instantly filing bug reports, but I must point out a bit of a problem with
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-9
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:24:37PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > Josip, please make sure this gets fixed, please get my
> > sunxvr1000 driver added (attached) and then add:
> >
> > CONFIG_FB_XVR500=y
> > CONFIG_FB_XVR2500=y
> > CONFIG_FB_XVR1000=y
> >
> > to
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 05:21:31PM +0100, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> > In my case this manifested itself when some PHP profiling via microtime()
> > suddenly became useless, and it also caused occasional PostgreSQL errors
> > with tables that had timestamp columns as keys, since it became possib
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Hi there,
Ever since kernel 2.6.29 came out, several classes of sparc machines have
been unable to upgrade, because they would get stuck while initializing
the new NMI watchdog code.
The process of trying to figure it out is mostly docume
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 03:01:41PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > No. The time resolution is not defined and within one step it will
> > > always provide the same value.
> > What? :) The problem here is that a time readout function provides the same
> > value across *two* steps. A monotonic func
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:33:05PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:18:54PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using jiffies as a clock source is not a "solution", it's a workaround,
> > because its resolution (CONFIG_HZ^1) is not good enough for
Hi,
Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> Here is my solution to this problem, lenny xen kernel:
> * dom0 with clocksource=jiffies and /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock=0
> * domU with clocksource=jiffies and /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock=0
Using jiffies as a clock source is not a "solution", it'
Hi,
Just in case I'm the first to notice, we now have:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xen/stable
This is the new upstream default branch, with paravirt_ops dom0, and based
on 2.6.32-stable, so it's presumably suitable for inclusion as a new patch
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:17:19PM +0100, Suno Ano wrote:
> currently (January 2010) mainline is in development for the .33 release,
> .32 is stable and used by most Linux Distributions like for example
> Debian, Ubuntu, Suse, etc.
>
> >>From what it looks now Debian and Ubuntu are going into free
stable/linux-2.6.27.y has this patch since 2009-10-12:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.27.y.git;a=commitdiff;h=2578cf95969936c372db29ee2bbc21c9b6a299aa
it's included in the release since v2.6.27.37.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
[...]
FWIW Here's the last upgrade output pasted exactly as it just happened:
% sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Buildi
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:15:52PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
> > GPT paritition tables and Linux roo
Hi,
I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have
GPT paritition tables and Linux root on LVM, and they can't use anything but
LILO (there are some novelty hacks for GRUB but I haven't been able to test
them yet because this is in production). I have kernel-img.conf set
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:38:22PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > > If the PROM console driver still has some utility, maybe the boot
> > > > option is
> > > > the way to go... does it? Does anyone still manufacture new machines
> > > > with
> > > > new and strange console types that we don't s
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:28:18AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > So you're saying that X working is more important than machines
> > > actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong.
> >
> > When N (where N > 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain
> > about not being able to
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:58:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> So you're saying that X working is more important than machines
> actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong.
When N (where N > 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain
about not being able to boot, the prioritie
On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 10:30:38PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > SPARC is a traditionally brand
> > architecture. This case
> > affects Ultra 5 and may be several other workstation. So if something
> > doesn't function
> > on one box it doesn't function on a whole gen
This has been fixed a couple of days ago by Andrew Vasquez with some
help by Dave Miller. The patch is sent to the linux-scsi list/maintainers
for inclusion in -next as well as in -stable
(Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>).
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp
Version: 2.6.26-4
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Hi,
qla2xxx's firmware loading thingy got hosed between .25 and .26,
I've already reported something along these lines to upstream, but I just
verified it with our kernel image so I'm filing it here too.
[
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:01:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > closing as according to upstream not a driver issue.
> > > > marked as resolved thus closing.
> > >
> > > I would appreciate it if you could first answer the question which I asked
> > > in August last year (which was the r
reopen 439072
thanks
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 07:08:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 04:54:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > closing as according to upstream not a driver issue.
> > marked as resolved thus closing.
>
> I would appre
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 04:54:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> closing as according to upstream not a driver issue.
> marked as resolved thus closing.
I would appreciate it if you could first answer the question which I asked
in August last year (which was the reason I didn't close
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:18:29AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:30:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > as you all are probably aware, we currently have some quite bad issues
> > with the sparc buildds for some times, especially
> > http://b
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:30:24PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> as you all are probably aware, we currently have some quite bad issues
> with the sparc buildds for some times, especially
> http://bugs.debian.org/433187 unkillable processes on the buildds.
>
> I hope that the mentioned RC bug can
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:57:23PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > >>> kernel which works well - at least on out US III machine. We've applied
> > >>> 179c85ea53bef807621f335767e41e23f86f01df to make sure that the system
> > >>> doesn't create
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:53:44PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >>> kernel which works well - at least on out US III machine. We've applied
> >>> 179c85ea53bef807621f335767e41e23f86f01df to make sure that the system
> >>> doesn't create unkillable processes anymore if you use the libc6 from
> >>>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 12:10:26AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > kernel which works well - at least on out US III machine. We've applied
> > 179c85ea53bef807621f335767e41e23f86f01df to make sure that the system
> > doesn't create unkillable processes anymore if you us
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:40:19PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> kernel which works well - at least on out US III machine. We've applied
> 179c85ea53bef807621f335767e41e23f86f01df to make sure that the system
> doesn't create unkillable processes anymore if you use the libc6 from
> _lenny_. Please
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:46:47AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> We (David Miller and I) are already working on this. We finally got some
> info dump from a debugging patched kernel and I expect we will have a fix
> within the next 3/4 weeks.
> >From our first look it s
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:17:33AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > I should mention that lebrun.d.o is still dead since the last attempt
> > (ssh unresponsive since 2007-08-30 ~21:25), when it was running a 2.6.22.5
> > with one davem patch applied (one line in kernel/futex_compat.c). If y
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 06:16:05AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> >> #433187 is the bug that has killed the buildds on lebrun and spontini,
> >> right?
> >
> > AIUC, yes. at least i can reproduce that on my buildd.
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We (David Miller and I) are already working on this. We
Hi,
#433187 is the bug that has killed the buildds on lebrun and spontini, right?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:52:59AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I'm reporting this bug that I have been seeing for a while and which is
> > a regression from a few months/years ago - the line-in input simply do
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:04:13PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > While browsing kernel options, I noticed:
> >
> > Please contact Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> if you had to
> > say Y here because your hardware is not properly supported
> > by ALSA.
> >
> > ...in the description of
Hi Adrian,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I'm reporting this bug that I have been seeing for a while and which is
> > a regression from a few months/years ago - the line-in input simply doesn't
> > work right. arecord(1) just doesn&#
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:52:59AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I'm reporting this bug that I have been seeing for a while and which is
> a regression from a few months/years ago - the line-in input simply doesn't
> work right. arecord(1) just doesn't record anything with i
Package: linux-2.6
Hi,
I'm reporting this bug that I have been seeing for a while and which is
a regression from a few months/years ago - the line-in input simply doesn't
work right. arecord(1) just doesn't record anything with it, it doesn't show
any errors, it records silence. The recording fro
Hi,
Thinking about this, there's actually another thing bothering me - you can't
use firmware-qlogic without the 'MODULES=most' option, IOW, there seems to
be no way to build just a minimal initrd just with the qla2xxx and the
firmware file.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
T
355881 409244
thanks
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:33:10PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:33:09PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:41:36PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > The other day I tried to boot a Sun Fire 280R t
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 01:41:36PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > The other day I tried to boot a Sun Fire 280R that works nicely with kernel
> > 2.4.30; however, it didn't work, because the qla2xxx driver can't find
> > the firmware image, and it fails to load properly, meaning I can't access
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.85e
Hi,
The other day I tried to boot a Sun Fire 280R that works nicely with kernel
2.4.30; however, it didn't work, because the qla2xxx driver can't find
the firmware image, and it fails to load properly, meaning I can't access
the hard disks in the machine, a
86 matches
Mail list logo
