On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 20, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> > Doesn't Debian run depmod in the postinst of the kernel package - and
> > iirc, again on boot anyway?
> Not anymore on boot, but I can't see why depmod should NOT being run
> when the kernel is in
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 23:58 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I guess it's called progress ;) Sarcasm aside, if you can give me an
> > example of an actual real life set of users who are adversely affected
> > then I'll try to do something to help out. But if you're asking for old
> > versions of softwa
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 23:09 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2009, Jon Masters wrote:
> > Yes, it was a bad idea of
> > mine (perhaps) to change the existing file format and I've learned
> > something, but it should only have affected for example that 3.
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 21:57 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Because the old modprobe does not understand the new relative (or rather
> rootless) paths, aggravated by the fact that initramfs-tools does not
> error out or display errors from modprobe (probably for good historic
> reasons), I suddenly h
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 21:13 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> [ adding jcm and lkml to Cc: ]
[ You want linux-modu...@vger.kernel.org rather than LKML. I've added
the former to the CC list, we can kill LKML off the CC shortly. ]
> > That would mean that m-i-t has created a backwards incompatibili
5 matches
Mail list logo
