Bug#627618: /lib/modules/2.6.38-2-686/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko: snd_pcm_avail() returned a value that is exceptionally large: 356416 bytes (2020 ms)

2011-05-22 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.38-5 Severity: minor File: /lib/modules/2.6.38-2-686/kernel/sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko Tags: upstream Got the following lines in my syslog. Can't say I have heard any clicks, and I don't know how to repro, but the text says I should report it so I am: May 22

Bug#622887: /usr/bin/perf_2.6.38: "perf list" lists unsupported events

2011-04-15 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-tools-2.6.38 Version: 2.6.38-3 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/perf_2.6.38 Event types listed by "perf list" can't be used for profiling (at least on my system). My expectation was that "perf list" would list only events I could actually use. For example, note how instructions ar

Bug#622803: /usr/bin/perf: /usr/bin/perf fails self tests

2011-04-14 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-tools-2.6.38 Version: 2.6.38-3 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/perf "perf" comes with build-in self testing facility, and it fails: " johan@johansdator:~$ sudo perf test [sudo] password for johan: 1: vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms: FAILED! 2: detect open syscall event: FAILED

Bug#381937: /vmlinuz: Detects > 8 CPUs in my desktop system

2008-12-16 Thread Johan Walles
04:40AM +0200, Johan Walles wrote: >> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp >> Version: 2.6.16-17 >> Severity: normal >> File: /vmlinuz >> >> >> Don't know how important this is, going with "normal". >> >> I'm getting thi

Bug#444880: Re-opening awaiting fix info

2008-10-16 Thread Johan Walles
reopen 444880 thanks Re-opening awaiting information about in which kernel this has been fixed. Regards //Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#444880: Re-opening awaiting fixed-version info

2008-10-12 Thread Johan Walles
Hi! I'll be re-opening this in a short while while waiting for information about which kernel version this bug has been fixed in. Without knowing which kernel version has the fix this is really hard for me to verify. If this has not been fixed, feel free to just leave this bug open until it is.

Bug#444880: acknowledged by developer (closing 444880)

2008-10-08 Thread Johan Walles
Maximillian / Bastian, on which kernel version does this work for any of you? For me it's still broken on this kernel, using the repro provided in the original bug report: Linux version 2.6.26-1-686 (Debian 2.6.26-5) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23))

Bug#444880: closed by Bastian Blank (works)

2008-10-06 Thread Johan Walles
gt; -- Vidarebefordrat meddelande -- > From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:16:52 +0200 > Subject: works > Works here flawless. > > Bastian > > -- > There are some things worth dying for. >

Bug#497621: Full dmesg output

2008-09-02 Thread Johan Walles
Here you go. /J dmesg.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

Bug#497621: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Mis-counts number of CPUs at boot

2008-09-02 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686 Version: 2.6.26-3 Severity: minor Since 2.6.26-1 I'm getting this from the kernel on every boot: " kernel: [0.00] NR_CPUS: 8, nr_cpu_ids: 4 " 2.6.25-2 didn't say anything about 8 CPUs. Here's my /proc/cpuinfo, will attach full dmesg: processor :

Bug#405810: Please provide package with vmlinuX, similar to kernel-debuginfo on redhat

2008-07-07 Thread Johan Walles
As a workaround for this if you want the kernel symbols for OProfile, you can use this script instead of opreport: http://marc.info/?l=oprofile-list&m=121514749918466&q=p3 It fetches kernel symbol information from /proc/kallsyms and lists them in a format identical to what opreport -l uses. //J

Bug#453234: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: disabled

2007-11-27 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686 Version: 2.6.22-4 Severity: normal When my system boots, it first says twice that the write cache for sda is enabled. Then it says once that it is disabled. What I'd like to get out of this bug report is to know if that last message is correct, and if so, wh

Bug#444880: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.21-2-686: /proc/20502/wchan has unexpected content, trivial repro

2007-10-01 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686 Version: 2.6.21-6 Severity: normal File: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.21-2-686 Try this: 1. At one prompt, do "cat". Now, switch to another prompt and... 2. Do "pstree -p|grep cat" to find out the PID of your cat command. I get 20502. 3. Do "cat /proc/20502/wchan". I get

Bug#405346: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-3-686: "SMP alternatives: switching to UP code" on SMP system

2007-01-02 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-3-686 Version: 2.6.18-7 Severity: minor File: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-3-686 dmesg says this on my SMP system: ... Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. SMP alternatives: switching to UP code ACPI: Core revision 20060707 CPU0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.20GHz stepping 04 SMP

Bug#381937: /vmlinuz: Detects > 8 CPUs in my desktop system

2006-08-07 Thread Johan Walles
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686-smp Version: 2.6.16-17 Severity: normal File: /vmlinuz Don't know how important this is, going with "normal". I'm getting this in my syslog: kernel: More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it. kernel: Use CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH or CONFIG_X86_BI