Bug#963025: firmware-iwlwifi: Microcode SW error detected / 9000-pu-b0-jf-b0-46.ucode

2021-02-19 Thread Jean Baptiste Favre
Hello, Just add another error this morning. You can find my dmesg -T output as attachement. Some context: * the error occured right after laptop boot * My Wifi setup: AP was forced to use frequency of 5240GHz and offered 20/40/80MHz channel width. Moving AP to 5180GHz solve the issue. My underst

Bug#963025: (no subject)

2021-02-10 Thread Jean Baptiste Favre
Got the same issue with latest kernel and iwlwifi firmware from sid > cat /proc/version Linux version 5.10.0-3-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-10 (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1) #1 SMP Debian 5.10.12-1 (2021-01-30) > dpkg -l firmware-iwlwif

Re: ata1 errors since upgrade to linux-image-4.5.0-2-amd64 4.5.4-1

2016-05-21 Thread Jean Baptiste Favre
Hello, It finally seems to be an hardware issue. I tried: 1. kernel 4.6 from experimental. Same result 2. kernel 4.5.3-2, which was known to work, from snapshots.debian.org I'll investigate the hardware option. Regards, Jean Baptiste Favre Le 21/05/2016 à 14:57, Jean Baptiste Favre a

ata1 errors since upgrade to linux-image-4.5.0-2-amd64 4.5.4-1

2016-05-21 Thread Jean Baptiste Favre
Hello, I'm facing ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x4 action 0x0 errors since the upgrade done on May 17th. Laptop boots OK, problem occur after 1h30 use, whatever the load. I don't know yet wheter it's an hardware issue or a kernel one. smartctl results can be found on [1]. Will

Bug#621707: nfs-common fails to start during boot

2011-04-09 Thread Jean Baptiste FAVRE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Had the same problem. Solved it removing nfs-common and portmap and reinstalling nfs-common. Then, portmap was not reinstalled but instead rpcbind was. Regards, JB On 08/04/2011 04:46, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > Ben, > > Why yes, of course. Lines

Re: Possible bug in kernel 2.6.37

2011-01-27 Thread Jean Baptiste FAVRE
rt for it. > > I recommend you stick with your dialog with upstream, it is likely to be > the most effective way to get to the bottom of the issue. > > Ian. > > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:02 +0100, Jean Baptiste FAVRE wrote: > Hello, > I'm not sure this is neither the

Possible bug in kernel 2.6.37

2011-01-26 Thread Jean Baptiste FAVRE
what I shall do. Any help will be appreciated, Regards, Jean Baptiste Favre -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1Afb8ACgkQM2eZoKJfKd3Y/QCgtMm2sTTj3VL/0hyPkMoP8my4 2lEAoKy13l/NiQBscuzCNmlgLc