On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 04:42:56PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:58 AM J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > I think I'll send the following upstream.
>
> looking good, but how about using a little helper for this?
I like it. And
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 06:58:29AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 08:58:49PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Thank you, could test this on my test setup and seem to work properly.
Great, thanks.
> Should it also be CC'ed to sta...@vger.kernel.org so i
x27;ll send the following upstream.
--b.
commit 595ccdca9321
Author: J. Bruce Fields
Date: Tue Jun 16 16:43:18 2020 -0400
nfsd: apply umask on fs without ACL support
The server is failing to apply the umask when creating new objects on
filesystems without ACL support.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:38:20PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed reproducer.
>
> It's weird, as the server is basically just setting the transmitted
> umask and then calling into the vfs to handle the rest, so it's not much
> different from any
Thanks for the detailed reproducer.
It's weird, as the server is basically just setting the transmitted
umask and then calling into the vfs to handle the rest, so it's not much
different from any other user. But the same reproducer run just on the
ext4 filesystem does give the right permissions..
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:45:27AM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> I disagree with this assessment. All of the reporters have been using
> ZFS, but this could indicate an absence of testers using other
> filesystems. We need someone with a NFS server which has a 4.15+ kernel
> and uses a differe
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:54:31PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> For the sake of those not watching
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60737
>
> It looks like the problem is that jfs was using a cookie value of 2 for
> a real directory entry, where NFSv4 expect 2 to represent "..". This
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 01:29:15AM -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Sorry for the noise, here's another oddity, same setup (client & server
> running 3.11-rc5):
>
> $ find /mnt/nfs/usr/share/ -name getopt.awk -ls
> 250724 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2237 Mar 16 04:46
> /mnt/nfs/usr/
"I've created users test1 and test2 in /etc/passwd, but with
swapped UID's"
There's a common (and understable) mistake here: many people think that
NFSv4 never requires uid's and gid's to agree between hosts. This is
not true.
NFSv4, when used with traditional auth_sys authentica
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:09:37PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Mi,
> We were wondering if you could help us define the security impact (if
> any) of your fix for nfsd4_op_flags, commit 5ece3ca upstream. If it
> does have a security impact, we can work with MITRE to get a CVE ID
> assigned.
Apolo
10 matches
Mail list logo
