Hello !
and should also end up back-ported in 6.9.5:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240616133543.1590007-1-osm...@heusipp.de/
Thanks for the notification. So this will end in our next upload based
on at least 6.9.5.
Looks like it just missed 6.9.5. Hopefully it will be in 6.9.6 then.
Reg
This is fixed in upstream 6.10:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.10-rc3&id=2a38e4ca302280fdcce370ba2bee79bac16c4587
and should also end up back-ported in 6.9.5:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240616133543.1590007-1-osm...@heusipp.de/
Regards,
Jör
Hello!
On 30/05/2024 09:27, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
On 30.05.24 08:55, Jörn Heusipp wrote:
commit fbf6449f84bf5e4ad09f2c09ee70ed7d629b5ff6 ("x86/sev-es: Set
x86_virt_bits to the correct value straight away, instead of a two-phase
approach") crashes d
Hello x86 maintainers!
commit fbf6449f84bf5e4ad09f2c09ee70ed7d629b5ff6 ("x86/sev-es: Set
x86_virt_bits to the correct value straight away, instead of a two-phase
approach") crashes during boot for me on this 32bit x86 system.
Updating a Debian testing system resulted in a hang during boot bef
Hello!
I cannot reproduce this problem.
So it might be probably somewhat system-specific. I have not tried other
i386 systems myself.
If you still can with the recent
6.8.11-1 landed in unstable,
6.8.11-1 also crashes.
you might try to bisect the changes in
upstream kernel to determi
5 matches
Mail list logo
