Bug#330680: cifs: files with large file names are missing

2006-03-15 Thread GOTO Masanori
> I use cifs to mount a couple of samba shares and files with long names are not > displayed. When I access the same shares, using LAN Browsing in konqueror, the > files are there. It looks like it has too do with the total length (inclusive > directories) of the filename. for example: > > /incomi

Bug#340388: CONFIG_USB_AUDIO should be compiled with 2.6.14

2005-11-22 Thread GOTO Masanori
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686-smp Version: 2.6.14-3 Severity: wishlist Hi, I request you to change .config settings as follows: CONFIG_OBSOLETE_OSS_USB_DRIVER=y CONFIG_USB_AUDIO=m It's an obsolete device driver, but it's useful with some USB audio devices. Because alsa snd-

Re: Bug#324550: Needs dependency fix [linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: install fails with "cannot stat `(0xffffe000)': No such file or directory"]

2005-08-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:30:30 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Actually, to be completely correct, the right value should be > "Conflicts: e2fsprogs (< 1.35-7)", as linux-gate.so started being > filtered in e2fsprogs 1.35-7. OK, I changed from (<= 1.37-2sarge1) to (<< 1.35-7). Thanks! Regards, --

Re: Bug#324550: Needs dependency fix [linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: install fails with "cannot stat `(0xffffe000)': No such file or directory"]

2005-08-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:46:34 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 08:17:58AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 07:49:23PM +0900, Simon Horman [Horms] wrote: > > > long time no see. It seems that the problem is indeed fixed if you get > > > the sarge (or later) version

Bug#324550: Needs dependency fix [linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: install fails with "cannot stat `(0xffffe000)': No such file or directory"]

2005-08-22 Thread GOTO Masanori
s for their > consideration. I don't know what the actual problem is, but I fixed this kind of ldd filtering problem for mkinitrd during the final stage of sarge development. Does this help you? * GOTO Masanori - Make mkinitrd work with new ldd format which change is introduced in g

Re: renaming linux-kernel source package

2005-07-11 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:08:51 +0300, Andres Salomon wrote: > This is the source package only, not the binary (image) package; so, if > users have a working kernel installed, they will be able to upgrade, > test out the new kernel, and use the old one if the new one is broken. > If we upload a new ke

Re: renaming linux-kernel source package

2005-07-10 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:48:15 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > * Older kernels get removed; no need to ask for manual removal of > > linux-kernel-2.6.12 after 2.6.13 becomes available for all archs. > > However, we lose the ability to have multiple 2.6's in a release, > > which sou

Bug#297724: Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format

2005-06-01 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:21:02 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Shouldn't the libc6 also conflict with older versions of initrd-tools or > does that create a loop somewhere? Indeed. If we'll bump up libc6 to the latest glibc 2.3.5, many users will also have same problem. I put conflicts entry

Bug#303281: mkinitrd should be updated for libc6 2.3.4 whose ldd changed output format

2005-04-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
reassign 301455 initrd-tools severity 303281 important merge 301455 303281 thanks At Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:13:54 +0300, George Cristian Birzan wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:44:12PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > sed -n 's/.*\(=>\)\?[[:blank:]]\+\(\/[^[:blank:]]*\).*/\2/p' > > > > > > > Some

Re: Bug#301455: ldd no longer puts a => before /bin/ld-linux.so.2

2005-04-27 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:25:39 +0300, George Cristian Birzan wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:23:30PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > I expect you to explain why mkinitrd breaks with new ldd. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /bin/bash | sed > 's/.*=>[[:blank

Bug#268450: fet: ftbfs [sparc] ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132)

2005-01-26 Thread GOTO Masanori
> fet fails to build on sparc. Duplicated with pbuilder. Not > release-critical since it never has. > > dh_shlibdeps > ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132) > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/fet/usr/bin/fet' gave error exit > status 1 > dh_shlibdeps: command return

Re: Bug#287824: libc6: fseek() fails and returns -1 without setting errno

2005-01-13 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 13 Jan 2005 05:01:50 -0800, Johan Walles wrote: > According to the man page: > > " > RETURN VALUE > The rewind function returns no value. Upon successful > completion, > fgetpos, fseek, fsetpos return 0, and ftell returns the current > offset. > Otherwise, -

Re: Bug#287824: libc6: fseek() fails and returns -1 without setting errno

2005-01-13 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:42:18 +0100, Johan Walles wrote: > The output of the following program is: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/test$ ./a.out > fseek: Unknown error 12345 > > Since I set errno to 12345 before making the (failing) fseek() call, > fseek() itself apparently fails without setting errno. >

Re: Dist-Uprade on HPPA64

2004-12-01 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:01:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:19:21PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > Well, IIRC, it is enough to use _only_ the 32bit kernel, and that would > > > make it easier for us, because we don't need an

Re: Processed: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Processed: [horms@verge.net.au: Re: Bug#282692: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386: relocation error]]

2004-12-01 Thread GOTO Masanori
Please read /usr/share/doc/libc6/README.Debian.gz Q6. > ls: relocation error: libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0 > not defined in file libc6.so.6 with link reference You use non debian version ls, or you install your version in /usr/local/bin, and so on. Regards, -- gotom

Re: 2.4 & 2.6 kernels, should sarge be 2.6 only at least for powerpc ?

2004-06-30 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:51:22 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > So, i am seriously considering dropping all 2.4 powerpc kernels, and > going with 2.6 only, and would like to get feedback both from > debian-kernel as well as debian-powerpc, feedback i didn't get in the > past. > > Ah, and i am seriously c

Re: Bug#231538: A possible solution

2004-06-13 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 13 Jun 2004 22:27:16 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040302 08:10]: > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:22:30PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > > > > > > > Well newer initrd-tools module-init-tools should be in woody > > >