Bug#623514: pm-utils: fails to hibernate on Lenovo T500

2011-08-26 Thread Denis Laxalde
Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > Denis Laxalde wrote: > > Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > > >> Another thing to try would be booting into an even more minimal > >> configuration, without loading any modules or mounting the root > >> filesystem, by passing the para

Bug#623514: pm-utils: fails to hibernate on Lenovo T500

2011-08-26 Thread Denis Laxalde
Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > Another thing to try would be booting into an even more minimal > configuration, without loading any modules or mounting the root > filesystem, by passing the parameter "break=top" on the kernel command > line[1]. It would presumably be necessary to load the appropriate

Bug#623514: pm-utils: fails to hibernate on Lenovo T500

2011-08-25 Thread Denis Laxalde
Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > > Then > > the machine halted or rebooted (depending on the mode) normally but I'm > > not sure what was supposed to happen here. (I mean, I did not expect to > > get back to the init shell I was on, since I left the grub cmd line > > untouched upon restart...) > > It

Bug#623514: pm-utils: fails to hibernate on Lenovo T500

2011-08-25 Thread Denis Laxalde
Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > Now that I look more closely, I suspect the dmesg you attached is from > trying to resume after an unsuccessful hibernation. What would be > most useful is to get as much information as possible somehow from the > _unsuccessful_ hibernation, or even better, to trigger a

Bug#623514: pm-utils: fails to hibernate on Lenovo T500

2011-08-25 Thread Denis Laxalde
Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > Does unloading ("modprobe -r") the e1000e driver before > hibernating help? No. It does not make any noticeable difference. -- Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Bug#575924: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: fuse module oops on boot

2010-06-18 Thread Denis Laxalde
Hi, Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 01:18 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 18:23 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote: > > forwarded 575924 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14347 > > thanks > > > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:05:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrot

Bug#575924: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: fuse module oops on boot

2010-04-11 Thread Denis Laxalde
forwarded 575924 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14347 thanks On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:05:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 23:05 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:28:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > &g

Bug#575924: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: fuse module oops on boot

2010-04-10 Thread Denis Laxalde
Hi, On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:28:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The more serious error messages suggest memory corruption. Have you > tested the RAM with memtest86+ yet? Yes, I've just run a pretty long test with memtest86+ and there was no error reported. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#575924: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: fuse module oops on boot

2010-04-07 Thread Denis Laxalde
Hi, On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:54:01 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 11:40 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Version: 2.6.32-10 > > Severity: important > > > > Boot fails from time to time. A relevant dmesg is attached. > &

Bug#540711: linux-image-686: display switch key combination "Fn+F8" stopped working since 2.6.29

2010-03-06 Thread Denis Laxalde
Hi, The upstream report finally lead to a solution. It seems that nvidia module still rely on /proc/acpi/event to catch acpi events. Since Debian disabled the deprecated option CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT, the file does not exist anymore. A simple workaround is then to rebuild the kernel with this opti

Bug#540711: linux-image-686: display switch key combination "Fn+F8" stopped working since 2.6.29

2010-02-16 Thread Denis Laxalde
Hi, On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:45:01 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Denis Laxalde wrote: > > > > > > > It was with package linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 (on which > > linux-image-2.6-686 still depends). > > I just tried with linux-im

Bug#540711: linux-image-686: display switch key combination "Fn+F8" stopped working since 2.6.29

2010-02-13 Thread Denis Laxalde
Le 13 février 2010 à 19:55 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 01:08:58PM -0500, Denis Laxalde wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > please give feedback on 2.6.32, sorry for late reply. > > > > > > thanks for followup. >

Bug#540711: linux-image-686: display switch key combination "Fn+F8" stopped working since 2.6.29

2010-02-13 Thread Denis Laxalde
Hi, Le 13 février 2010 à 13:31 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit : > On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote: > > > I have the same situation with a amd64 kernel. After coming back > > from holiday and installing the new kernel, I lost the fn-f8 screen > > switch thingy. > > > > Sjoerd > > >

Bug#540711: linux-image-686: display switch key combination "Fn+F8" stopped working since 2.6.29

2009-08-09 Thread Denis Laxalde
Package: linux-image-686 Version: 2.6.30+20 Severity: normal Hi, I have a Dell Latitude D620 with a Nvidia graphic card GeForce Go 7300 and nvidia drivers (version 185) built using module-assistant. Since version 2.6.29 (and now 2.6.30) the display switch key combination (Fn+F8) stopped working (