> The network is ok now
> ...but, I don't have sound anymore: «
> eth0: 3Com 3c589, io 0x310, irq 5, hw_addr 00:00:86:52:4B:CB
add the line:
exclude irq 5
to /etc/pcmcia/config.opts. this will tell pcmcia not to use that irq line...
rgds
-daniel
hi
your device has an incomplete CIS on the card and therefor needs an updated
one loaded. i think there's the problem...
get and extract the pcmcia-cs package, then do a:
cp etc/cis/3CXEM556.dat /lib/firmware/3CXEM556.cis
(note the change from .dat to .cis)
rgds
-daniel
--
To UNSUBSCR
ds
-daniel
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 02.26, Daniel Ritz wrote:
> hi
>
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 22.47, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> >
> > I tried latest debian 2.6.12 kernel; see:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321419
> >
> > irq 11:
set to CS_IN_USE
which results in the function having the CB irq assigned. yenta_set_socket
then just changes the irq routing to use the PCI interrupt but the first
functions irq handler is registered on an ISA interrupt. boom.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:14, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
> hi all,
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:05:02AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > received another bug report concerning TI irq routing.
> > your patch don't seem to fix this PCI1250 rev2.
> > you'll find the bug report at
> > http://
at least a related one).
yep, the same.
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Jefferson Cowart
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
rgds
-daniel
--
[PATCH] 3c574_cs: disable interrupts in el3_close
3c574_cs forgets to disable interrupts during el3_close().
fix it by doing what 3
ble
so that so many BIOS vendors get it wrong. ]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- 1.22/drivers/pcmcia/ti113x.h2005-03-11 21:32:12 +01:00
+++ edited/drivers/pcmcia/ti113x.h 2005-04-07 23:14:40 +02:00
@@ -442,6 +442,25 @@
}
+/* changes the irq
On Friday 01 April 2005 19:52, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Seems to be the IRQ storm issue again... Daniel, IIRC you worked on that
> issue before: do you have an idea on how to write a proper patch for this
> issue?
>
btw. i'm working on the patch again. but like the routing code it's not
so easy
On Friday 01 April 2005 19:52, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Seems to be the IRQ storm issue again... Daniel, IIRC you worked on that
> issue before: do you have an idea on how to write a proper patch for this
> issue?
>
nope it looks more like something else. looking at the debian bug report:
- lsp
9 matches
Mail list logo
