Bug#850425: mpt3sas "swiotlb buffer is full" problem only under Xen

2019-03-11 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 3/11/19 2:34 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > > I'm not sure. Patch 3 of this series is basically already there (see > commit c6d4381220a0087ce19dbf6984d92c451bd6b364). So maybe all we need > is patch 4, which should really be easy to do? FWIW to me this also seems to be the only missing part. -bor

Bug#852324: [Xen-devel] Bug#852324: x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping

2017-03-16 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 03/16/2017 08:18 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 21:49 +, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 16/03/2017 21:05, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 00:50 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 22:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Control: retitle -1 [xen] x86/mm: Fo

Bug#852324: [Xen-devel] Is: EPT violations. Was:Re: Problems with pci/vga passthrough

2017-01-24 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 01/24/2017 01:51 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 01/24/2017 01:44 PM, Diederik de Haas wrote: >> On dinsdag 24 januari 2017 13:28:28 CET Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>>> Reported it at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852324 >>>>> but given B

Re: [Xen-devel] pvops microcode support for AMD FAM >= 15

2012-12-05 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/05/2012 12:02 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 05.12.12 at 17:48, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 12/05/2012 07:43 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: I've just tried this on a fam 15h and I get: (XEN) microcode: collect_cpu_info: patch_id=0x6000626 (XEN) microcode: size 5260, block

Re: [Xen-devel] pvops microcode support for AMD FAM >= 15

2012-12-05 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/05/2012 12:05 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: I looked at trying to apply the same logic to the Xen side of things but it is different enough that I can't immediately see how. microcode_fits() would seem to be the place to do it, but I'm not at all sure what this equiv table stuff is all about.

Re: [Xen-devel] pvops microcode support for AMD FAM >= 15

2012-12-05 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/05/2012 07:43 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: I've just tried this on a fam 15h and I get: (XEN) microcode: collect_cpu_info: patch_id=0x6000626 (XEN) microcode: size 5260, block size 2592, offset 60 (XEN) microcode: CPU0 found a matching microcode update with version 0

Re: [Xen-devel] pvops microcode support for AMD FAM >= 15

2012-11-26 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 11/26/2012 09:58 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 11/26/2012 09:13 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 13:44 +, Jan Beulich wrote: The only other thing to check for is that you don't have any artificial size restriction left in that code (I think patch files early on

Re: [Xen-devel] pvops microcode support for AMD FAM >= 15

2012-11-26 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 11/26/2012 09:13 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 13:44 +, Jan Beulich wrote: On 26.11.12 at 14:21, Ian Campbell wrote: Debian has decided to take Jeremy's microcode patch [0] as an interim measure for their next release. (TL;DR -- Debian is shipping pvops Linux 3.2 and X