4.18 (and now 4.19)
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/de54e925-9536-f2cc-7b89-7205b3fb2...@gameservers.com/
[3] IPv6 routing table max_size badly dimensioned compared to IPv4
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20140227192403.ga13...@xs.powerdns.com/
--
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Network Engineer
Fiberby ApS - AS42541
On 12/09/2010 03:34 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 9.12.2010 16:24, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
>> Usefull if building for sparc64 userland, because the
>> sparc and sparc64 userlands use the same 64-bit kernel,
>> making it impossible to always select the correct userland
>> architecture for the
On 12/09/2010 02:24 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:35:50PM +, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
>> Usefull if building for sparc64 userland, because the
>> sparc and sparc64 userlands use the same 64-bit kernel,
>> making it impossible to always select the correct userl
do for the weekend, have just had an insane week.
I just noticed the armhf port effort yesterday, that would also need
this patch, I will add your Ack-by when sending the updated patch.
I also have a bunch of e1000e cleanups scheduled for 2.6.38, will submit
to netdev this weekend as well.
On 11/05/2010 01:42 PM, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
>
>> Instead of creating the debian package for the compiling userland,
>> create it for a userland matching the kernel thats being compiled.
>
>> Eg. with this patch the following make command:
On 11/05/2010 12:41 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 12:32:41PM +, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
>> Instead of creating the debian package for the compiling userland,
>> create it for a userland matching the kernel thats being compiled.
>>
>> This patch supports all Lenn
On 11/05/2010 12:32 PM, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
> kbuild, deb-pkg: select userland architectire based on UTS_MACHINE
s/architectire/architecture/g
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
On 11/04/2010 12:36 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 4.11.2010 13:29, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
>> No, not if you are cross compiling since ARCH=x86 isn't specific to
>> either, we would have to look at the config. In that case it is better
>> to do something l
On 11/04/2010 05:58 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 03:44:04AM +, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
>> [...]
>> +# Attempt to find the correct Debian architecture
>> +local forcearch="" debarch=""
>> +case "$ARCH" in
>> +i386|ia64)
>> +debarch="$ARCH"
On 11/04/2010 02:42 AM, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
> + case "$SUBARCH" in
> + arm) debarch=$(grep -q CONFIG_AEABI=y .config \
> + && echo armel || echo arm) ;;
> + esac
Hmm, didn't
On 11/03/2010 10:57 PM, Michal Marek wrote:
> I know very little about debian packaging, but shouldn't this be done in
> all cases, regardless of CROSS_COMPILE being set or not? You even show
> in the above example that in some cases you don't need CROSS_COMPILE to
> build a kernel for a different
and 102 bugs on this package in total
--
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
http://asbjorn.it/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
2) Abandon lenny for dom0 use / wait until stable-2.6.32 is in squeeze.
Packages are beginning become availible for testing
(huge thanks to Bastian Blank)
3) Get jeremy's 2.6.31 or 2.6.32 tree packaged and into lenny-backports
(together with xen-hypervisor-3.4-{i386,amd64})
I doubt that
13 matches
Mail list logo
