On 10/03/2019 23:12, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 3/10/19 11:03 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 10/03/2019 21:35, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Using dom0_mem=2GiB,max:4GiB instead of dom0_mem=2GiB,max:2GiB (which I
>>> started
On 10/03/2019 21:35, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> found -1 4.19.20-1
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Reviving a thing from Jan 2017 here. I don't have this thread in my
> mailbox, so no inline quotes.
>
> I just installed some HP z820 workstation and rebooted it into Xen
> 4.11.1+26-g87f51bf366-3 with linux 4
On 17/03/17 03:05, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
> On 03/16/2017 08:18 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 21:49 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 16/03/2017 21:05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 00:50 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
On 16/03/2017 21:05, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 00:50 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 22:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> Control: retitle -1 [xen] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping
>>> Control: tag -1 upstream confirmed
>>> Control: found -1 4.9.13-1
>>>
>
o post to linux-kernel saying "this patch
>>> fixes such-and-such". You should:
> ...
>> I see. This is not something I've done before, but I'd be willing to
>> give it a go.
>>
>> But, I am not the author of these two patches. That's David V
5 matches
Mail list logo
