Bug#1087602: linux: io_uring deadlock when building chromium (6.1.115 regression)

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:31:22 +0100 Aurelien Jarno wrote: Source: linux Version: 6.1.115-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org Dear maintainers, Since the last Bookworm point release, the build daemons often run into a io_uring deadlock when building chromium: Do

Bug#1024149: linux-image-amd64: 32-bit mmap() puts large files at non-random address

On Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:12:47 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 01:24:16PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Salvatore Bonaccorso , 2022-11-19 11:11: > > > Given you were able to tackle the issue further, can you report the > > > issue to upstream > > > > Do

Bug#996713: firmware-brcm80211: firmware becomes non-responsive while running as an access point on RPI4

On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:00:16 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: > > > Now I'll try a 5.14 kernel backport (with the firmware from bullseye). > If it STILL happens, then I'll try and get a patch upstream to detect > this issue and reinit the hardware. > > Just an update

Bug#996713: firmware-brcm80211: firmware becomes non-responsive while running as an access point on RPI4

On 11/15/21 3:22 AM, Diederik de Haas wrote: Andres: You mentioned bullseye in your initial report, but it didn't have the usual footer mentioning various program versions and I'm especially interested in the kernel version. Could you mention that in subsequent reports (if any)? The user in #deb

Bug#996713: firmware-brcm80211: firmware becomes non-responsive while running as an access point on RPI4

On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 13:10:19 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > I'm currently trying a newer Cypress firmware (from unstable), so > we'll see if it also has the same crash. > Same thing with the firmware-brcm80211 20210818-1 in unstable. Oct 17 12:49:58 wifi1 kernel: [

Bug#996713: firmware-brcm80211: firmware becomes non-responsive while running as an access point on RPI4

Package: firmware-brcm80211 Version: 20210315-3 Severity: normal This bug is mostly for documentation purposes. When running a raspberry pi 4b as an access point, after a random period of time the on-chip firmware will crash and leave the wireless driver (brcmfmac) unusable until the chip is rese

Bug#991968: firmware-brcm80211: security updates for wifi FragAttacks

Package: firmware-brcm80211 Version: 20210315-3 Severity: important Tags: security X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team A whole bunch of wifi (protocol-level) security flaws were published here: https://www.fragattacks.com/ Cypress (AKA Infineon), who maintains some of the broadcom firmware blobs

Bug#984489: firmware-brcm80211: newer versions fail to load on raspberry pi 4b with "brcmf_sdio_htclk: HT Avail timeout"

Package: firmware-brcm80211 Version: 20210208-3 Severity: important The version of firmware-brcm80211 in bullseye (specifically 20201218-3) works fine on my Rasperry Pi 4 board. However, the version in sid does not. Specifically, the brcmfmac kernel driver fails to load with some clock errors. Her

Bug#733088: linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae: tpm_tis module breaks suspend on x200s

Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae Version: 3.2.51-1 Severity: normal With the standard wheezy kernel, suspend fails: [ 31.357482] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. [ 31.357913] PM: Preparing system for mem sleep [ 31.424249] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.

Bug#729542: firmware-ipw2200: instability with firmware 3.1

I've been actively using the machine for 48 hrs now, with no network problems. I think it's safe to say that the 3.0 works well with ipw2200s, while 3.1 is buggy. Please consider downgrading the firmware. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subjec

Bug#729542: firmware-ipw2200: instability with firmware 3.1

BTW, the original download site for the firmware gives me a 404. I snagged the 3.0 version from fedora: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/ipw2200-firmware/ipw2200-fw-3.0.tgz/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Bug#715370: Acknowledgement (linux-image-3.9-1-486: CONFIG_GPIO_CS5535 has been set to 'y' when it should be 'M')

Yes, CONFIG_GPIO_CS5535 is forced to 'Y' because the OLPC XO-1 power management settings (CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_PM, CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_SCI, and a few other related options) are boolean. Making the PM code modular is the only way to fix this, but doing so would be racy due to the various hooks that are regi

Bug#705788: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di: please include viafb module for OLPC XO-1.5 support in d-i

On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 16:07:47 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: tag -1 patch > > On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 22:07 -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Package: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di > > Version: 3.2.41-2 > > > > The OLPC XO-1.5 doesn't support VESA. It need

Bug#705788: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di: please include viafb module for OLPC XO-1.5 support in d-i

Package: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di Version: 3.2.41-2 The OLPC XO-1.5 doesn't support VESA. It needs the viafb driver in order to get display output. Similar to #705780, please consider including viafb.ko in the fb-modules udeb. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.or

Bug#705780: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di: please include lxfb module for OLPC XO-1 support in d-i

Package: fb-modules-3.2.0-4-486-di Version: 3.2.41-2 The Geode LXFB driver used to be built into the Debian kernel. With bug #686528, it was made modular, which makes things more difficult for the XO-1 platform. OLPC XO-1 doesn't support VESA, which means the lxfb driver is required in order to

Bug#686528: linux-image-3.2.0-3-486: [lxfb] doesn't understand modes passed via GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX in /etc/default/grub

On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 21:26:21 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > I'm cc'ing Andres because he's previously requested various Geode > config changes to support OLPC. Thanks! > > On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 22:38 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > Package: src:linux > > Version: 3.2.23-1 > > Severity: norm

Bug#569494: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: pcspkr sometimes breaks audio

On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 09:14:39 -0500 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Andres, > [...] > > Ways forward: > > - libasound2 could use "Suggests: alsa-base". (Recommends would be >too strong because alsa-base has nontrivial dependencies itself and >it is not too unusual to use binaries linked to

Bug#640964: linux-image-3.1.0-rc4-486: BUG() triggered on XO-1 hardware

Package: linux-image-3.1.0-rc4-486 Version: 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1 Severity: normal During boot on an OLPC XO-1, I encounter the following problem. I believe it's the statement BUG_ON(a->cpuid >= NCAPINTS*32), though I'm not staring at an exact copy of linux-2.6 source. Boot device: /pci/n

Bug#639113: linux-image-3.0.0-1-486: please enable various OLPC drivers

Oh, and the 3.1 kernel will be including the following new symbols as well: CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_PM=y CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_RTC=y CONFIG_OLPC_XO1_SCI=y CONFIG_OLPC_XO15_SCI=y It would be nice to have those in -486 as well. The -686-pae kernel won't be used for OLPC, because PAE conflicts with it. So, desp

Bug#639113: linux-image-3.0.0-1-486: please enable various OLPC drivers

Package: linux-image-3.0.0-1-486 Version: 3.0.0-2 Severity: wishlist OLPC support is partially enabled in this kernel, but a few drivers that have gone upstream (or been reworked) are missing from the config. Please consider enabling the following config options: CONFIG_MFD_CS5535=m (used by

Bug#569494: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: pcspkr sometimes breaks audio

In theory, this should never happen; snd_card_create() takes an idx that sets the order of cards, /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base-blacklist.conf blacklists snd-pcsp (so it should never be loaded!), and /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base.conf sets idx=-2 for snd_pcsp so that it's not loaded as the first soundcard.

Re: RFC: Bug handling policy

On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:38:49 + Berni Elbourn wrote: > Andres Salomon wrote: > >> 2. Severities > >> > >> Many submitters believe that their bug meets one of the following > >> criteria for high severity. We interpret them as follows

Re: RFC: Bug handling policy

Hi Ben, Ack on everything below. Some comments are below. On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:14:54 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > I've drafted a policy based on what I believe to be best practice. > Please comment - is anything wrong, or anything missing? I also left > some questions in square brackets. >

Bug#551542: fscache: null pointer dereference in fscache_object_slow_work_execute

> Oh and just to let you know, it does say you guys are the > maintainers. :) Let me know if you need anything else. > > ~Matt I'd be interested to know if this still occurs on 2.6.31. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub

Bug#551393: drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -12. Kernel failed to parse or rejected command stream

On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:20:28 +1030 Arthur Marsh wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.2 > Severity: normal > > > I attempted to run extremetuxracer on this machine with radeon9200se > and radeon driver and received the following output: How reproducible is this? Does it

Bug#550190: linux-image-2.6.31-trunk-amd64: SCSI warnings/errors with LSI SAS1064E controller

On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:54:49 -0600 dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 08:17:30PM +1100, Jason White wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Version: 2.6.31-1~experimental.1 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > After upgrading to 2.6.31 from 2.6.30, I get the following, quite > > frequently, in

Bug#548397: linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem: Random Lockup with automount, mysqld, and kswapd0 error messages.

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:33:45 -0500 Paul Logasa Bogen II wrote: > > After a semi-random period of normal operation (anywhere from a few > hours to a week) the machine will suddenly get a series of page > allocation errors followed by a series of "soft lockup - CPU#[X] > stuck" messages after which

Bug#546213: severity of 546213 is normal

On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:12:06 +0200 Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:01:45PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > This sounds an awful lot like a firmware bug, as well (for which we > > don't have the source code for). > > > > Perhaps you cou

Bug#546213: severity of 546213 is normal

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:33:21 +0200 Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:31:17AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 22:21 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Bastian, would you mind *explaining* why you think its justified > > > to

Bug#525351: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686: audio broken on x40

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:44:00 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:53:24PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686 > > Version: 2.6.29-3 > > > > Hi, > > > > On my x40, audio is now broken with 2.6.29-1-68

Bug#539026: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: agpgart module fails to initialize

Note that without the i915 modeset arg, agpgart loads fine (but I don't get KMS). This is the following video chipset (on a thinkpad x200s): 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07) 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corp

Bug#539026: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: agpgart module fails to initialize

Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 Version: 2.6.30-3 During boot, I see: [1.347047] Linux agpgart interface v0.103 [1.366133] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [1.378704] i915 :00:02.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 [1.378719] i915 :00:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (leve

Bug#525351: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686: audio broken on x40

Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-686 Version: 2.6.29-3 Hi, On my x40, audio is now broken with 2.6.29-1-686. I believe that this is a Debian-specific regression, as a stock Linus kernel (tag v2.6.29) doesn't have this problem. Some apps (ie, ones using gstreamer) simply refuse to run; others simpl

Bug#504555: initramfs-tools: fix reboot partition support

major:minor numbers). This patch fixes that by explicitly checking for something that starts with a number.>From 7651875d24f8e35bf4b601beef7b7a4e8b92ad9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:56:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix redboot par

Bug#497133: initramfs-tools: explodes when kernel is booted

filesystem. >From 586f67264971f0b8432aa99c13c9e16f009a729f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:04:09 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] allow root=mtd0 to be used skip root checks if ROOT doesn't start with /dev. Signed-off-by: Andres S

Bug#504553: initramfs-tools: include framebuffer modules when 'most' is selected

ing patch which includes framebuffer modules. >From c52b4d1346055c0c33c2474162585be7dde7c9dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:31:24 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] include video (framebuffer, fbcon) modules This adds support for video/fbcon

Bug#504551: initramfs-tools: please add support for upstream kernel's "make deb-pkg"

including it. >From d86b9926cba57a91abb7096c5f467d41cbfb4ebc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:02:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] add support for linux-2.6's deb-pkg ..via /etc/kernel Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#504550: initramfs-tools:

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.92l Severity: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#504549: initramfs-tools: please add mtd/jffs2/ubifs modules to initrd when 'most' is selected

rom 8854095ef36c80a4178bc2ea93fe80415019bc34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:19:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] include mtd, jffs2, and ubifs modules This adds support for mtd/jffs/ubifs when 'most' is selected. Note that this doesn&#

Bug#499270: initramfs-tools: postrm.d/update-initramfs breaks removal of old kernel

Hi, We can possibly distinguish between /etc/kernel/postinst.d getting called from kernel-package context, and upstream debpkg context. debpkg calls with the following: test -d /etc/kernel/postinst.d && run-parts --arg="$version" /etc/kernel/postinst.d kernel-package's uses: system ("run-

Bug#497133: initramfs-tools: explodes when kernel is booted with root=mtd0

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 17:37:28 +0200 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:22:34AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > > --- /usr//share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions.orig > > 2008-09-01 11:14:11.0 -0400 > > +++ /usr/

Bug#497133: initramfs-tools: explodes when kernel is booted with root=mtd0

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:58:15 +0200 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > Package: initramfs-tools > > Version: 0.92f > > > > On OLPC machines, root is a nand device that is mounted as mtd0 (it >

Bug#497133: initramfs-tools: explodes when kernel is booted with root=mtd0

Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.92f On OLPC machines, root is a nand device that is mounted as mtd0 (it is neither a block device nor a char device). The arguments passed to the kernel are "ro root=mtd0 rootfstype=jffs2". Unfortunately, attempting to use an initrd based upon initramfs-tools

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: [...] > > > > I'm having serious trouble parsing what you're trying to say here. > > Could you rephrase? > > you never checked the rh kernel. they do a *lot

Bug#485192: SDHCI hacks used on OLPC

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:51:52 +0200 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > These are the patches Andres made & sent upstream: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/936294 > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/937056 > > If they don't make it

Bug#485192: SDHCI hacks used on OLPC

etting the patch tag since the last hunks look like a kludge > (specially the off-by-one thing). > > Putting Andres Salomon on CC, as he probably knows about the reasons > this was added. These are hardware workarounds; I would highly suggest waiting for this stuff to go upstream

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

Sam Morris wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:45 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: >> Daniel Baumann wrote: >>> Sam Morris wrote: >>>> Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? >>> Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel >>>

Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper

Daniel Baumann wrote: > Sam Morris wrote: >> Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand? > > Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel > has a bouncing email address. > Sorry, that's my fault; he has updated packages for me to sponsor, but I just haven't had time. Anyway

Bug#362064: udev: udev tries to write to an installed, working initrd without asking

Hi, Here's a use case where having initramfs-tools unconditionally update initramfs images is a bad thing (at the very least, violating the principal of least surprise). I had a machine that was had a poorly supported sata_mv chipset; dapper nor sarge w/ 2.6.15/2.6.16 images would install onto it

Re: removal of svenl from the kernel team

Alright Sven, this is the last time I'm ever going to respond to you. I've wasted enough time on this. Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 04:23:11PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >>

Re: removal of svenl from the kernel team

Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-23 16:23]: >> This vote is open to all current members of the kernel team; that >> is, everyone listed > > Didn't Sven already say he'd stop kernel work anyway? Yes. Did he? Well, he&

removal of svenl from the kernel team

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to remove Sven Luther from the kernel team (that is, remove his svn commit privileges, as well as remove him from the Uploaders field of kernel packages), and remove him from the debian-kernel (and debian-kernel-devel, when it is crea

additional mailing list request

Hi, I've made a new request for an additional kernel discussion list: http://bugs.debian.org/358625 Part of the process involves other interested people following up to the bug. So, can people who would like to see the additional list please follow up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and express their inter

Re: Modules packaging policy - call for discussion

Jurij Smakov wrote: > Hi, > > It is pretty obvious (to me, at least) that the need for the official > packaging policy for the out-of-tree kernel modules is long overdue. As > mentioned on the wiki page dedicated to it [0], the current situation is > a mess. I would like to call for a formal discu

Re: removal of svenl from the project

The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well. For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process: http://squishy.cc/svenl.txt This is a lot from two weeks ago,

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > > from the project. The process is outlined here: > > <

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 21:01 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > Sven has always been a nuisance to deal w/, but up until now I have not > considered this action. In the past two weeks, the following comments > made by him have changed my mind: > > 2006-03-07: > jonas: i h

removal of svenl from the project

Hi, I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed from the project. The process is outlined here: , and I have already completed step 1. Step #2 requires the support of some 15 developers. I am attemptin

volatile backport

* Lower kernel-package versioned build-dep. + * Drop gcc-4.0 build dep. + + -- Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 26 Sep 2005 00:22:34 -0400 + linux-2.6 (2.6.12-6) unstable; urgency=high [ Andres Salomon, Bastian Blank ] --- linux-2.6-2.6.12.orig/debian/templates/control.source

Re: standardizing on a language

Ok, looks like people seem to want python more; I'll start rewriting my tools to be in python, and working on the common lib stuff. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: standardizing on a language

On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 03:47:34PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:53:18AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:52:23AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > I don't know anything about ruby. > > Well, others are going to

Re: standardizing on a language

On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 06:52:23AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:23:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > [...] > > I'm rather disappointed by the lack of responses to this. I don't intend > to do any more infrastructure work on the kern

Re: standardizing on a language

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:23:30AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > Preferences? Once we have a common language, we can have a common > library as well (ages ago, I wrote half a Kconfig parser in racc; that > seems like it'd be useful for all kinds of scripts, but I'

Re: modules

On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:36 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:34:22PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:24 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > [...] > > >

Re: modules

On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 19:24 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:25:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > > > Alright, I think I'm a fan of #2. The module maintainers upload their > > packages to sid, with the binary package -source in there. We

Re: [Secure-testing-team] kernel update

On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:03 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Joey Hess wrote: > > Now that 2.6.12 is finally in testing and work is well underway to > > remove 2.6.8, I think we can switch to tracking security holes in the > > new kernel now. There are several items listed as unfixed in 2.6.8, wo

Re: In preparation for 2.6.13 - initrd issues

On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:23:25PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: > Hello, > > As you probably know, the 2.6.13 kernel is out, and we are facing some > problems > with packaging it for Debian. A major change compared to 2.6.12 is the > discontinued support for devfs, which, I understand, renders cu

Re: how to detect a debian kernel from `uname -r`

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:16:38PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to detect a debian kernel from uname -r. > > My suggestion would be to add a "-debian" at the end of the localversion > of kernels _patched_/modified by debian, and to leave the localversion > compl

standardizing on a language

hon scripts (see scripts/testconfigs). Preferences? Once we have a common language, we can have a common library as well (ages ago, I wrote half a Kconfig parser in racc; that seems like it'd be useful for all kinds of scripts, but I'm not going to spend any more time on it until we d

Re: 2.6.12-6 release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:15:25AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > For other architectures, if there are any issues, let me know; otherwise > I'll build and upload 2.6.12-6 tomorrow. > http://people.debian.org/~dilinger/kernel/2.6.12-6/ Go nuts. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: svn layout confusion

On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 15:20 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:51:06AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Ok, so now that we have dists/sid and dists/trunk (which is for development > > and experimental stuff); how is this actually supposed to work? I > &g

Re: svn layout confusion

On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 22:25 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:51:06AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Ok, so now that we have dists/sid and dists/trunk (which is for development > > and experimental stuff); how is this actually supposed to work? I > > unders

svn layout confusion

Ok, so now that we have dists/sid and dists/trunk (which is for development and experimental stuff); how is this actually supposed to work? I understand the scenario when we have 2.6.12 in sid and 2.6.13rc in trunk; stick any new development stuff in trunk, backport to sid if desired, do sid relea

2.6.12-6 release

Unless anyone has objections, I intend to upload 2.6.12-6 tomorrow. The only flavour that fails to oldconfig is arm/config.s3c2410; Vincent, can you please fix that? The following shouldn't prompt: cat debian/arch/config > .config cat debian/arch/arm/config.s3c2410 >> .config make oldconfig ARCH=

Re: firmware packages

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:11:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > Are there any attempts to provide firmware images which are needed for > several hardware and not included in the kernel as packages? > Such as? I'm not aware of any firmware that's not included in the kernel that we'

Re: modules

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:28:51PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: [...] > > Well, my idea is to try to host all those module package in the kernel > subversion tree (under modules), in such a way that we can trigger automated > or semi-automated uploads of them in case of kernel abi changes. I assume

Bug#324202: include ReiserFS ACL support in 2.6.12 kernel

On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: [...] > > First: this discussion is pointless and always ends in people promoting > their favorite toy (only). Pretty much. > > So how do you know they are reliable? For me, XFS began eating my files > after 1.5years of usage, and t

Re: changelog format

On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:59 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > [...] > > >

Re: changelog format

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:30:41AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > Well, we have not decided, the first [] is thrown in by dch, and > people are still using the same format as always, and maybe not always remove

changelog format

al-IP-over-ATM to be modular, instead of being statically included (closes: #323143). (Andres Salomon, Bastian Blank) * powerpc-apus.patch: Added preliminary apus patch, not applied though. (Sven Luther) * powerpc-pmac-sound-check.patch: Added. (Sven Luther) * [i386] U

Re: SVN layout

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 15:33 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:41:34PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:53:38PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:41PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > [...] > > > >

Re: prepare 2.6.13

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 12:22:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > BTW, was 2.6.13 already released ? Or any idea when it will be ? > > The mail arrived 2:17 MEST. > > > Also, i believe we need a 2.6.12-6 upload which fix the remainin

Re: SVN layout

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:53:41PM +0900, Horms wrote: [...] > > > svk may be different, if so, > > > this is a excellent time to discuss that. > > > > It just gets crazy if it can't find merge points. > > Could you elaborate a little. I think you are the only one us

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Debian mkinitrd: Integrate kdump

On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:07:29PM +0530, Rachita Kothiyal wrote: > Hi > > The following set of patches made on mkinitrd (from initrd-tools > package:version 0.1.82), would enable the integration of kdump with > Debian. For more details about the kexec based kdump solution please > refer to Docume

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels

On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:30 +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: > * Horms wrote: > > 2. 2.6.8-16sarge1 for stable-security > > 3. 2.4.27-10sarge1 for stable-security > I can do sparc builds mid-next-week; probably not before then, unless someone can make (reasonably fast) hardware available to m

Re: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Moving forward with the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels

On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:51 +0900, Horms wrote: [...] > Obviously the security team needs to be involved. However > CCing them on emails seems largely fruitless. Do you have > any ideas on how to work with them to make this release happen? > It is becoming quite frustrating to say the least. > M

cross compilation breaking sparc build?

Hi, Specifying --arch $(ARCH) unconditionally is what's breaking the sparc kernel build (and it just seems like a bad idea). First, shouldn't we just specify this if we're cross-compiling (ifneq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),$(DEB_HOST_ARCH))) ? Second, --arch's arg needs to match what include/asm points to

Bug#323452: "hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21" errors + freeze (VIA VT82C686 chipset)

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:02:31PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: [...] > > Then is there any reason why SMART doesn't detect any problem > except some errors at power-on time? And why don't I get such > errors with a 2.6 kernel (though I haven't done much testing) > if it is not a problem with the

Re: Bug#323183: Please remove some linux packages from sid

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:22:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 09:23:52AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > > This will break a lot packages depending on one of those, inclu

Bug#322723: Bug#323143: ip neigh flush (iproute) hangs because CONFIG_ATM_CLIP=y

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 02:13 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 16 August 2005 19:35, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > > > This should probably be the case anyways, as it appears to be marked > > EXPERIMENTAL, and the config does support tristate. Not only that, bu

Bug#323143: ip neigh flush (iproute) hangs because CONFIG_ATM_CLIP=y

severity 323143 wishlist retitle 323143 linux-2.6: CONFIG_ATM_CLIP should be configured as a module thanks On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:08:18PM -0700, Alvaro Martinez Echevarria wrote: > Package: linux-source-2.6.12 > Version: 2.6.12-1 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > Regarding this problem with iprout

Bug#295678: kernel-image packages with CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y enabled

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:57:35AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 05:34:33PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:29 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > The problems is not Dell PowerEdge specific. My TYAN Tiger-i7320-S5350 > > > (standard dual

Re: 2.6.12 in volatile?

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:21:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: [...] > > Wrong, linux-2.6 needs at least version 9.005 of kernel-package. So either we > backport it to sarge, or i provide a patch of the needed functionality for the > version of kernel-package in sarge. > Is it just powerpc that ne

Bug#322086: ALSA support for ali5451 is sill broken

For future reference, the original bug is #303311. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#315968: kernel: usb-storage not working, system freeze

reopen 315968 tags 315968 + sarge thanks I assume you meant to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] :) On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:30:59PM +0900, Horms wrote: > reopen 315968 > thanks > > This bug is still valid for 2.6.8, so lets leave it here for now. > At the very least we can use it to coodinate known probl

2.6.12 in volatile?

Hi, So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12 backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that; however, if people want 2.6.8+security in volatile, I'll just put 2.6.12 in p.d.o/~dilinge

Re: linux-2.6_2.6.12-2_i386.changes REJECTED

argeted at unstable. > > I guess we need an epoch > Give the man an epoch! 2.6.12-2 is re-tagged in svn, w/ some epoch spiffiness that waldi did; only the transition packages (kernel-image-*) got epoch'd. We're both building test packages.. Hopefully this should appease katie. -- Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#321964: linux-2.6: package that depends on all -headers for $arch

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.12-1 > Severity: wishlist > > There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a > particular arch (eg. kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-i386). This is very useful > for build-depends when

Re: Bug#282119: marked as done (2.6.9 kernel breaks kernel compilation)

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 04:48:06 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: [...] > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:33:04 +0200 > From: Maximilian Attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 2.6.9 kernel breaks kernel compilation > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Co

Re: linux-2.6 - subarch and patches

On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:55:12 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > linux-2.6 currently "supports" something called subarch. It should be > used for incompatible patches. This is needed for m68k and I think mips. > > Problems with this > - mostly unimplemented, > - namingschema differs from

  1   2   3   >