Package: kup-client
Version: 0.3.6-2.1
Severity: normal
Please update the package's recommends to point to gpg-agent.
cu Andreas
notforwarded 553503
reassign 553503 linux-2.6
found 553503 2.6.26-19lenny2
found 553503 2.6.30-2
close 553503 2.6.32-3
tags 553503 lenny
thanks
On 2009-12-29 Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Further investigation showed that process address space randomization
> in 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 and 2.6.26-2-amd64 is
On 2006-04-17 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:09:27PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> kernel-package >> 10 uses debconf for the user communication. This
>>> includes the pre and post scripts specified in /etc/kernel-img.conf
On 2006-04-17 Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:59:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> For sarge updates of the linux kernels, grub needs to be updated before
>>> linux-image*. Can this be forced
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey Everyone,
> You've been identified as maintainers of packages that may need to be
> rebuilt along with an ABI-changing sarge kernel security update. We are
> in the process of such an update[1].
[...]
> [1]http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelSargeUpda
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> Hi Horms / security team,
>> I found three more security related reports/patches on linux-kernel.
[...]
> This is CAN-2005-3119 and... uh... not supposed to be public yet...
http://www.ussg.
On 2005-09-25 Fenrir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-11
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> I can successfully apt-get the kernel-source-2.4.27 package using
> testing, but when trying to bunzip it bunzip2 gives a Data Integrity
> Error while de
On 2005-02-26 Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dev=ATA and dev=/dev/hdX are definitely not supposed to do the same thing.
Hello,
What is the correct devicename on Linux 2.6, if I want DMA?
> Check the cdda2wav(1) man page.
dev=ATA is not documented in cdda2wav(1) (from 2.01.01a01).
On 2005-01-16 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:14:40PM +0100, Florian Boelstler wrote:
> > just want to mention that I can reproduce the problem with a kernel
> > built from kernel-source-2.6.8-12 using:
> > "cdda2wav -t 1 dev=ATA:1,0,0"
> > and
> > "cdda2w
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-5
Severity: normal
Apart from the solved problems with cd-writing in 2.6.8 (memory leak
and requiring root permissions) there is another one:
It breaks cdda2wav quite heavily
cdda2wav -t 1 dev=ATA:1,0,0
(or dev=/dev/hdc) results in a heavily distorted a
reassign 266912 dvd+rw-tools
thanks
On 2004-08-19 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 07:16:49PM +0200, Andreas Neudecker wrote:
> > Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686
> > Version: 2.6.8-1
> > Severity: normal
> > File: kernel-image-2.6.8
> >
> > After upgrading to kern
On 2004-08-22 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 06:30:05PM -0700, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
[...]
> > The main reason that I'm writing is that it seems
> > version 2.6.8 of the kernel has broken cdrecord.
[...]
> Consensus on this seems to be that the kernel will
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.x Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Mmm, i think there is a misunderstanding here (maybe on my part).
> Existing XF86Config-4 files will have this "cleverness" like you say
> already generated, and thus break if there is no /dev/psaux as core
> pointer.
> T
On 2004-07-07 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:29:44PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > The description from kernel-patch-debian and kernel-image does not
> > list which patches are contained in the Debian diff. That way it's
> > pretty hard to evaluate which
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:45:24PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > For more info, read the debian-vote mailing lists archive.
> > > > And welcome to debian politics :)
> > > Hmm, I wonder what this means for the firmware blob issues..
> > Firmware is software,
On 2004-07-01 Jason Dorje Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.6-2-686
> Version: 2.6.6-2
> Severity: important
> When I boot up in this kernel I can not succeed. The eventual problem
> is that none of the modules can be loaded because of a "read-only file
> system".
[.
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:43:40PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 08:19:07AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
>> > For example, i know that the XF86Config-4 file needs to be changed when
>> > using a ps2 mouse, since it was /dev/psaux
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:03:32AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Are you sure this is a kernel-image issue at all? This looks like the
>> 20th instance of either
>> 1a) #255180: module-init-tools: removal of modprobe.conf breaks
>> mkinitrd
>> 1b) #255390: mki
On 2004-06-25 William Lee Irwin III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 04:09:58PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > I just wanted to add another report. I've got the same issue, except
> > with the non-SMP 686 package. I don't have a separate /boot partition,
> > and / is ext3. Vers
19 matches
Mail list logo
