Bug#1011089:

2023-08-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I think it's ok for the files to remain there, as long as there is a clear indication that they are not used anymore to set command line options, and furthermore, that the systemd units definitely do not use them. I realize such a change will probably generate dpkg conf prompts, though :/

Bug#1022185: nfs-utils: blkmapd crash

2022-10-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Package: nfs-utils Version: 1:2.6.2-1+b1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Under certain conditions, blkmapd can crash due to calling free() on a pointer that wasn't malloc()ed. The reproducer I list below using a debian sid VM went as far as isolating it to having LVM Logical Volumes on SCSI dis

Bug#1014429:

2022-07-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I created a salsa PR with my attempt at fixing this: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/nfs-utils/-/merge_requests/18

Bug#1014429:

2022-07-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ok, my current theory is this, please poke holes: autofs and nfs-common are both unpacked. Then the setup begins. If autofs is setup first, it means systemctl daemon-reload will be called at the end, and that will run all the generators. Since nfs-common is already unpacked, it's generator is on

Bug#1014429: nfs-utils: rpc_pipefs mounted twice

2022-07-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Package: nfs-utils Version: 1:2.6.1-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, on a fresh debian sid VM, if I "apt install autofs -y", at the end I will have rpc_pipefs mounted in two places: root@sid-autofs-nfs-common:~# mount -t rpc_pipefs root@sid-autofs-nfs-common:~# apt install autofs -y Reading

Bug#1011089: nfs-utils: old configs /etc/default/nfs-* should have warnings

2022-05-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Package: nfs-utils Version: 1:2.6.1-2 Severity: Normal Dear Maintainer, the config files in /etc/default/nfs-* should have a warning at the top stating that they are left there only for SySV systems that do not use systemd. In other words, they are ignored when systemd is used, and the configurat

Bug#1005236:

2022-02-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> I'm not familiar of changes in nfs-utils. Given the major version update and > the > fact that both Debian 11/Sid haven't included v2, I guess it's either not > well- > tested on Debian, or has breaking changes that most people don't want? I've been looking at the exp package lately, since I'm

Bug#988430: nfs-utils: nfs-common does not restart services on upgrade

2021-05-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Package: nfs-utils Version: 1:1.3.4-5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while testing a fix for rpc.gssd, part of nfs-common, I discovered that this service (and others) is not restarted as part of the upgrade. Further troubleshooting led me to the nfs-utils.service service, which is not enabl

Bug#892654: Salsa MR

2019-03-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi, I submitted a salsa merge request for this: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nfs-utils/merge_requests/2