Heyho!
For lack of time/money @ customer, some unfortunately incomplete info:
libdrm git (c1c8bbf8) with experimental x-x-v-intel seems to be an
improvment. We didn't work with it for long, but switching to text console
and back didn't trigger the bug (and did, before). Enabling compositing
Heyho!
See stack trace at end.
This seems to be the same issue; I also see a lot of these and the system
is fine (including Internet connection over pppoe.)
This is on a QNAP 419, running 2.6.32-2 plus a patch (I got this kernel
from Martin Michlmayr because the QNAP 419 was not supported by D
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-1
Severity: minor
Heyho!
Trying to build my 2.6.32 for my QNAP (as documented in README.Debian)
fails because the config is not generated:
+++
~/linux-2.6-2.6.32$ time fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen
binary-arch_armel_none_kirkwood
make -f debian/rules.real
Heyho!
Could you please consider the patch in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13469
to fix fscache?
Without it, fscache immediately oopsed and disabled itself.
The patch is from fscache author David Howells, and I'm running it
successfully on my system on top of 2.6.30-1~experiment
Hi,
A very short time (<100M) after reading from data stored in a fscache'd nfs
(nfs3 or nfs4, doesn't matter), the cache gets disabled with something like:
+++
Jun 6 18:59:58 syydelaervli kernel: [ 1107.260445] Pid: 2104, comm: kslowd Not
tainted 2.6.30-rc8-686 #1
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686-smp
Version: 2.6.15-7bpo1
Severity: normal
Yo!
I'm experiencing hangs at boot with 'hda: lost interrupt' every few seconds
being the last signs of life as soon as the ahci module is loaded (not sure
about the exact boot sequence, but I think udev loads these dr
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 00.43, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a
> stable kernel tree, or something?
The real nice thing would be a central mailing list where all kernel
development were coordinated. Perhaps some sort of industry-s
On Monday 04 July 2005 11.51, Horms wrote:
> I am not sure about 3.4's ability to compile 2.4.27, but
> it seems unlikely to me that all of the gcc versions you mention above
> will be omitted from etch.
I'm quite confident that the release team and/or gcc maintainers will agree
that 'is needed t
8 matches
Mail list logo
