Bug#663041: please enable ib_srpt

2012-03-08 Thread Adam Heath
On 03/08/2012 01:57 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: reassign 663041 src:linux-2.6 3.3~rc6-1~experimental.1 found 663041 linux-2.6/3.2.9-1 tags 663041 + upstream patch quit Adam Heath wrote: [commit a42d985bd5b234da8b61347a78dc3057bf7bb94d, applied during the 3.3 merge window] That enables SRP

Bug#663041: please enable ib_srpt

2012-03-07 Thread Adam Heath
Package: linux-image-3.3.0-rc6-amd64 Version: 3.3~rc6-1~experimental.1 Severity: wishlist http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=f59e842fc0871cd5baa213dc32e0ce8e5aaf4758 That enables SRP target support for Infiniband. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-

Bug#656668: 3.2 has different /sys/class/power

2012-01-20 Thread Adam Heath
I use module-init-tools 3.16-1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f19d3ec.3070...@brainfood.com

Bug#656668: 3.2 has different /sys/class/power

2012-01-20 Thread Adam Heath
severity 656668 minor thanks (haven't actually gotten your mail yet, it's stuck due to greylisting; I'm writing this based on what I see in website). Actually, this is not the correct bug. My laptop lost complete power. The battery was fully drained. I plugged in it, booted it up, and ther

Bug#656668: 3.2 has different /sys/class/power

2012-01-20 Thread Adam Heath
package: linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64 version: 3.2.1-1 severity: major linux 3.2 changed what is available in /sys/class/power_supply. wmbattery worked fine with 3.1, but the new 3.2 upgrade broke it. This is a kernel problem, please change this back. You can add the new ADP1, but don't remove

Re: bits from the release team

2006-01-03 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Margarita Manterola wrote: > On 1/3/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why do you put the kernel together with the essential toolchain freeze, it > > should be together with the rest of base, i believe. > > [...] > > We will have a kernel which is outdated by two

Bug#324583: #324583: status of broken apply/unapply scripts

2005-10-27 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > Well, who told you it was supposed to be fixed, can you point to the svn > commit fixing it ? Did you even read the bug that is mail is a part of? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

Bug#324583: #324583: status of broken apply/unapply scripts

2005-10-27 Thread Adam Heath
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:40:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6. > > However, we are at -10, and it is still broken. > > > > I need this fixed so that I

Bug#324583: #324583: status of broken apply/unapply scripts

2005-10-27 Thread Adam Heath
This bug was tagged pending on Aug 24, and was s upposed to be fixed in -6. However, we are at -10, and it is still broken. I need this fixed so that I can upload new xen packages, as they require pristine source to generate a patch against. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a