Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source linux
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux'
Limit currently set to 'source':'linux'
> tags 1089698 + pending
Bug #1089698 [src:linux] linux: Loop-mounted UDF ISOs no longer readable
Added tag(s) pend
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1091893 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-28-amd64: Watchdog detected hard
LOCKUP on CPU 8, then CPU 0
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 important
Bug #1091893 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-28-amd64: Watchdog detected hard
LOCKUP on CPU 8, th
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 11:18:37PM -0500, Neal Murphy wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 6.1.119-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I plugged in my SSK NVME-to-USB3 adapter.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1091893 important
Bug #1091893 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-28-amd64: Watchdog detected hard
LOCKUP on CPU 8, then CPU 0
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.119-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
I plugged in my SSK NVME-to-USB3 adapter. I mounted it, checked it (without
writing anything), and unmounted it. The system displayed the '... has data to
be written ...' msg for quite
Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 01:07:10PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26):
> > Perfect, thanks. I've hinted the linux-* lot a few britney ago and they
> > migrated. I'm currently busy discovering and tying up loose ends… I'm
> > not sure how many of them there are,
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jan 2025 13:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1091708: fixed in linux-base 4.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091708,
regarding linux-base: Update/add debconf template translation [INTL:ca]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
linux-base_4.11_sourceonly.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-base_4.11.dsc
linux-base_4.11.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jan 2025 13:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1090811: fixed in linux-base 4.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #1090811,
regarding please set linux-sysctl-defaults to Priority: important
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 13:33:30 +0100
Source: linux-base
Architecture: source
Version: 4.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Changed-By: Salvat
Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 01:05:35PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso (2025-01-01):
> > I do not see explict voices against the changes, Cyril am I correct
> > that this is fine as well from d-i point of view?
>
> Sure, we'll live with whatever consensus is found. It
Salvatore Bonaccorso (2025-01-01):
> I do not see explict voices against the changes, Cyril am I correct
> that this is fine as well from d-i point of view?
Sure, we'll live with whatever consensus is found. It could be tricky
for us to change a package's Priority in the middle of a release for u
Cyril Brulebois (2024-12-26):
> Perfect, thanks. I've hinted the linux-* lot a few britney ago and they
> migrated. I'm currently busy discovering and tying up loose ends… I'm
> not sure how many of them there are, but hopefully that's a manageable
> number (famous last words).
And of course with
13 matches
Mail list logo
