Re: Need information where tests can be found for linux-base Debian package

On Mon, 2024-10-28 at 11:04 +, sai.sathuj...@toshiba-tsip.com wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the delayed response. Thank you for the information. > > I noticed that tests available in lib/t as part of CI in build job. > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux-base/-/jobs/5886385#L918. > >

Bug#1084791: firmware-realteak: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/firmware/rtl_bt/rtl8723cs_xx_config.bin'

Package: firmware-realtek Followup-For: Bug #1084791 Granted that Bastian has opened RM bug to remove the package ([1]), I think a Conflics / Replaces is a way to go with respect to this file conflict. At least it lets to get the new firmware-realtek package migrate to testing and then if it break

Processing of linux-signed-amd64_6.11.5+1_source.changes

linux-signed-amd64_6.11.5+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-signed-amd64_6.11.5+1.dsc linux-signed-amd64_6.11.5+1.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Re: Need information where tests can be found for linux-base Debian package

Hello, Sorry for the delayed response. Thank you for the information. I noticed that tests available in lib/t as part of CI in build job. https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux-base/-/jobs/5886385#L918. Can you please provide your opinion on running these tests as part of autopkgtest since

Processing of linux-signed-arm64_6.11.5+1_source.changes

linux-signed-arm64_6.11.5+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-signed-arm64_6.11.5+1.dsc linux-signed-arm64_6.11.5+1.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

linux-signed-arm64_6.11.5+1_source.changes is NEW

Mapping sid to unstable. binary:ata-modules-6.11.5-arm64-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-6.11.5-arm64-di is NEW. binary:cdrom-core-modules-6.11.5-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-dm-modules-6.11.5-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-modules-6.11.5-arm64-di is NEW. binary:ext4-modules-6.11.5-arm64-di is NE

linux-signed-amd64_6.11.5+1_source.changes is NEW

Mapping sid to unstable. binary:ata-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di is NEW. binary:cdrom-core-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-dm-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di is NEW. binary:drm-core-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di i

Bug#1086175:

btrfs scrubs and raid checks run fine without errors, btw.

Bug#1086175: linux-image-6.1.0-26-amd64: panic at shutdown with rootfs on RAID1 while initialy resyncing

Package: src:linux Version: 6.1.112-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: johan.kroec...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Steps I did to reproduce the bug: - install Debian on two RAID1 volumes, one for /boot and one LUKS encrypted for the root filesystem - reboot system before the initial resync of the

Bug#1085425: marked as done (linux-image-6.10.12-riscv64: dwmmc_starfive causes filesystem corruption on emmc)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:04:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1085425: fixed in linux 6.11.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1085425, regarding linux-image-6.10.12-riscv64: dwmmc_starfive causes filesystem corruption on emmc to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1085953: marked as done (ip6tables: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported)

Your message dated Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:04:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1085953: fixed in linux 6.11.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1085953, regarding ip6tables: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

linux_6.11.5-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 07:25:33 +0100 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 6.11.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Salvato