Bug#1082647: copy_exec: [regression] ignores trailing slash, installs file as directory name

2024-09-23 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: initramfs-tools-core Version: 0.142+deb12u1 Severity: serious Justification: hidden breakage for users, ought to be fixed in stable-pu X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de In bullseye, this would work: copy_exec /usr/lib/klibc/bin/rnd_shuf /usr/libexec/ copy_exec /usr/sbin/rdate /usr/libexec/ I

Processed: Re: Bug#1082001: linux-image-6.1.0-25-amd64: TOMOYO LSM rejects execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) inside chroot

2024-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 upstream Bug #1082001 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-25-amd64: TOMOYO LSM rejects execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) inside chroot Added tag(s) upstream. -- 1082001: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082001 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs

Bug#1082001: linux-image-6.1.0-25-amd64: TOMOYO LSM rejects execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) inside chroot

2024-09-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 upstream On Tue, 2024-09-17 at 01:45 +0200, Alfred Agrell wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 6.1.106-3 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: blub...@gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > > Please run the following program (as root, so the chroot succeeds): > > > #define _GNU_SOURCE

[bts-link] source package src:linux

2024-09-23 Thread debian-bts-link
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #1082081 (http://bugs.debian.org/10820

Processed: reassign 1081836 to src:linux

2024-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1081836 src:linux Bug #1081836 [linux-image-6.10.9-1-arm64] linux-image-6.10.9-1-arm64: Please enable drivers for am64 hummingboard-t Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-6.10.9-1-arm64' Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-6.10.9-1

linux-signed-arm64_6.10.11+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2024-09-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 16:24:33 +0200 Source: linux-signed-arm64 Architecture: source Version: 6.10.11+1 Distribution: sid Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By

Processed: submitter 1041484

2024-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 1041484 xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) Bug #1041484 [src:linux] kernel: hpet_acpi_add: no address or irqs in _CRS Changed Bug submitter to 'xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) ' from '"Al Ma" '. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Processing of linux-signed-arm64_6.10.11+1_source.changes

2024-09-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
linux-signed-arm64_6.10.11+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-signed-arm64_6.10.11+1.dsc linux-signed-arm64_6.10.11+1.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

linux-signed-arm64_6.10.11+1_source.changes is NEW

2024-09-23 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Mapping sid to unstable. binary:ata-modules-6.10.11-arm64-di is NEW. binary:btrfs-modules-6.10.11-arm64-di is NEW. binary:cdrom-core-modules-6.10.11-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crc-modules-6.10.11-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-dm-modules-6.10.11-arm64-di is NEW. binary:crypto-modules-6.10.11-arm64-di

Bug#1082611: linux-headers-amd64-6.10 and linux-image-amd64-6.10 ?

2024-09-23 Thread Harald Dunkel
Package: linux-image-amd64 Version: 6.10.6-1 Hi folks, would it be possible to provide meta packages linux-headers-amd64-6.10 and linux-image-amd64-6.10 (and similar), to support installing several major kernel versions in parallel (stable and backports, for example)? Currently it is easy to lo

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#1054345: linux-image-6.5.0-2-amd64: Segfault with USB Mass storage

2024-09-23 Thread Craig Small
Hi Marco, Were both these bugs supposed to go to procps? I'm not sure why the BTS moved both. I've tagged etc 1054345 so if you want one of them back, I'd rather you took 1054346. On Sun, 22 Sept 2024 at 03:57, Debian Bug Tracking System < ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote: > Bug #1054345 [src:linux