The suite "oldoldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads.
Mapping oldoldstable-security to oldoldstable-proposed-updates.
binary:linux-headers-5.10.0-0.deb10.30-4kc-malta is NEW.
binary:linux-headers-5.10.0-0.deb10.30-5kc-malta is NEW.
binary:linux-headers-5.10.0-0.deb10.30-686 i
The suite "oldoldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads.
Mapping oldoldstable-security to oldoldstable-proposed-updates.
binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-27-4kc-malta-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-27-5kc-malta-di is NEW.
binary:affs-modules-4.19.0-27-loongson-3-di is NEW.
bina
Diederik provided me with a new v6.10 kernel build to try:
[0.00] Linux version 6.10-rc5+unreleased-arm64 (
debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-13 (Debian
13.2.0-25) 13.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.42) #1 SMP Debian
6.10~rc5-1~cknow (2024-04-24)
I can confirm
Thanks,
Leith Bade
le...@bade.nz
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 23:10, Diederik de Haas
wrote:
> > > > The device tree is a modified version of the
> > > > upstream linux device tree file
> "mediatek/mt7986a-bananapi-bpi-r3.dtb"
> > >
> > > Can you share those changes? I analyzed and enabled modules pu
> >Anything build-depending
> on
> > linux-headers-generic for the BPF header (eg: src:systemd) is
> affected.
>
> Well, linux-headers is for kernel modules, not userland. Don't use
> it
> this way then?
BPF programs are intended to be built, shipped a
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 05:51:41PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>Anything build-depending on
> linux-headers-generic for the BPF header (eg: src:systemd) is affected.
Well, linux-headers is for kernel modules, not userland. Don't use it
this way then?
B
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1063161 6.5.10-1
Bug #1063161 [src:linux] Add amd_pmf module
Marked as found in versions linux/6.5.10-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1063161: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1063161 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux] Add amd_pmf
module
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versi
Control: reopen -1
Control: found -1 6.8.9-1
Control: found -1 6.9.2-1~exp1
On Thursday, 23 May 2024 17:33:47 CEST Vincent Blut wrote:
> Le 2024-05-23 17:12, Nathan MALO a écrit :
> > Thank you very much for enabling those two features in the kernel.
> > Your work is much appreciated !
> >
> > Ma
> Hi
>
> This weeks meeting will happen tomorrow. Currently the agenda is
> empty.
It would be great if the kernel experts could do some brainstorming
about a solution for
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064976
I understand why the current dependency is there and the problem i
Hi
This weeks meeting will happen tomorrow. Currently the agenda is empty.
See
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/meetings/-/wikis/20240626
If you have more points, please just reply here.
Bastian
--
Computers make excellent and efficient servants, but I have no wish to
serve under them.
11 matches
Mail list logo
