Bug#1057290: bpftool: please build from https://github.com/libbpf/bpftool

2024-05-29 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Wed, 29 May 2024 at 23:27, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2024 19:00:59 +0100 Ben Hutchings > wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-12-02 at 20:04 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > And so, it will be great if kernel team will like to package and > > > maintain it, if not, then I will be happy to

Bug#1057290: bpftool: please build from https://github.com/libbpf/bpftool

2024-05-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 29 May 2024 19:00:59 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2023-12-02 at 20:04 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > And so, it will be great if kernel team will like to package and > > maintain it, if not, then I will be happy to do it. Please > > reject this bug report if you think bpftool sh

Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci)

2024-05-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Thorsten, On 2024-05-27 02:31, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Would also help a lot to know if this is a 6.8.y only thing, or happens > with 6.9 and mainline as well, as 6.8.y will likely be EOLed soon. I could reproduce the issue with 6.9.2 too, will try mainline tomorrow. FTR the procedure i

Bug#1071501: [PATCH] NFS: add barriers when testing for NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED

2024-05-29 Thread NeilBrown
On Wed, 29 May 2024, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 11:19 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > On Tue, 28 May 2024, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > On Mon, 2024-05-27 at 13:04 +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > > > > > dentry->d_fsdata is set to NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED while unlinking or > > > > renam

linux-signed-i386_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into bullseye-backports

2024-05-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 16:52:31 +0200 Source: linux-signed-i386 Architecture: source Version: 6.1.90+1~bpo11+1 Distribution: bullseye-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ke

linux-signed-amd64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into bullseye-backports

2024-05-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 16:52:31 +0200 Source: linux-signed-amd64 Architecture: source Version: 6.1.90+1~bpo11+1 Distribution: bullseye-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian K

linux-signed-arm64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1_source.changes ACCEPTED into bullseye-backports

2024-05-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 16:52:31 +0200 Source: linux-signed-arm64 Architecture: source Version: 6.1.90+1~bpo11+1 Distribution: bullseye-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian K

Bug#1063754: fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop

2024-05-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi Bud, Please understand that when I aksed you to carry out a specific test, I had a good reason for doing exactly that. The tests that you have carried out so far, while useful, don't provide the same information. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to d

Processed: Re: fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop

2024-05-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #1063754 [src:linux] fat-modules: SD corruption upon opening file on Linux desktop Added tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 1063754: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063754 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1057290: bpftool: please build from https://github.com/libbpf/bpftool

2024-05-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2023-12-02 at 20:04 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Package: bpftool > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, > debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > The official home for bpftool is now the github repo [1] but > keeps the kernel as the

Re: Kernel features and Cloud (and GCE)

2024-05-29 Thread Andrew Jorgensen
> Andrew's question is a bit higher level than that, and mostly boils down > to "Which cloud environments do we actually want to support with the > cloud kernel?" That's right. And I'd like it to include GCE, but there are a lot of cloud environments out there so drawing a line somewhere can help

Bug#1072108: linux-image-amd64: Enable CONFIG_PINCTRL_METEORLAKE

2024-05-29 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Wednesday, 29 May 2024 03:22:50 CEST Mark Pearson wrote: > >> X-Debbugs-Cc: mpearson-len...@squebb.ca > > ... > > The MR for it (1062) has just been merged into master. > > Awesome - thanks! I did scan the bugs before submitting but missed that one. > Apologies. Should I close this issue then a