Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1065112 + upstream
Bug #1065112 [src:linux] linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64: System unresponsive after
resume from suspend when WoWLAN enabled in iwlwifi
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.76-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: da...@balch.co.uk
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I am trying to get WoWLAN working on an old DELL via a PCIe WiFi card (
https
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:38:12 +0100 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:12:21PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > With the new vmlinux.h shipped in the headers package, the BTF case
> > should be covered.
>
> The relevant code in Linux is:
>
> | quiet_cmd_btf_ko = BTF [M] $@
> | c
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 12:12:21PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> With the new vmlinux.h shipped in the headers package, the BTF case
> should be covered.
The relevant code in Linux is:
| quiet_cmd_btf_ko = BTF [M] $@
| cmd_btf_ko = \
|
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:25:27 +0100 Bastian Blank
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:03:11AM +, Colm Buckley wrote:
> > Why was this never the case before? And can you be more precise
about what
> > "stuff" is missing? Is there a previous bug report I can reference?
>
> It complains loudly ab
> The build wants the image available (it does not really fail without, but
lacks stuff) and we need some dependency to keep image and headers in sync
for people using dkms.
To be honest, "it does not really fail without, but lacks stuff" seems like
the use case that "Recommends:" (or even "Sugges
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:03:11AM +, Colm Buckley wrote:
> Why was this never the case before? And can you be more precise about what
> "stuff" is missing? Is there a previous bug report I can reference?
It complains loudly about BTF.
> DKMS should handle its own dependencies, I'd have thoug
Why was this never the case before? And can you be more precise about what
"stuff" is missing? Is there a previous bug report I can reference?
DKMS should handle its own dependencies, I'd have thought - I see a clear
use case for installing header files without the corresponding images.
C
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 wontfix
Bug #1064976 [linux-headers-amd64] linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64 incorrectly
depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
1064976: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064976
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:19:39PM +, Colm Buckley wrote:
> The linux-headers packages for kernel version 6.6 seem to depend on the
> corresponding
> linux-image packages, but I believe that this should not be the case (and was
> not the
> case in previous versions).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1064976 linux-headers-amd64
Bug #1064976 [linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64] linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64
incorrectly depends on the corresponding linux-image-amd64 package
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-6.6.13+bpo-amd64' to
11 matches
Mail list logo
