Package: src:linux
Version: 6.5.3-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: h...@tavira-net.de
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading the linux kernel to version 6.5.3, the display of my
Lenove T15 notebook will remain black after waking up from suspend.
The external display connected to the HDMI port works
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Bug #1050256 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [src:linux]
AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
1050256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050256
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 12:01:37PM +0530, intrigeri wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux
> Control: retitle -1 AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
> Control: affects -1 src:apparmor src:lxc src:systemd src:pdns src:policykit-1
> Control: found
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1052130 src:linux 6.5.3-1
Bug #1052130 [linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64] linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64: kernel
complains about general protection fault several times before host goes down
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-6.5.0-1-amd64' to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1052063 - moreinfo
Bug #1052063 [src:linux] regression: nvme drive not found after kernel upgrade
from bookworm-security
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 1052063 + confirmed
Bug #1052063 [src:linux] regression: nvme drive not found after kern
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 1050256 6.3.1-1~exp1
Bug #1050256 [src:linux] AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Unix sockets
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1050256 to the same values
previously set
Bug #1050256 [src:linux] AppArmor breaks locking non-fs Uni
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:14:24AM +0800, 邓景元 wrote:
> Excuse me,
>
> Most packages in sid non-free-fimware has not been updated since
> 20230513-3. I wonder the updating plan of firmware? Could anyone
> tell me?
Because we (kernel-team maintainers) had no (free) time yet to handle
the rebas
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:15:42PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Can you verify if it's this issue known upstream?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/5dhv0s.d0f751zf65...@gmail.com/
>
Yes, it is the same issue. Sorry for taking too long to reply. I was
juggling with low partition s
Hi all,
On 09-09-2023 13:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
All ci.d.n workers (except riscv64) now run the kernel from
bookworm-backports. systemd passes it's autopkgtest again in unstable,
testing and stable.
We're having issues [1] with the (backports and) unstable kernel on our
main amd64 host, so w
On Wed 11 Jan 2023 00:17:44 +, Gervase wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-12-24 at 14:16 +, Gervase wrote:
> > Awhile back, I did have a look around the fix. From what I
> > remembered,
> > intrigeri's solution used a systemd shutdown 'script' to check for
> > devmaps or whatever of LVMs, ZFS partition
On Fri 07 Apr 2017 12:02:46 +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> /lib/systemd/system/initramfs-shutdown.service:
> ⋯
> /usr/share/initramfs-tools/initramfs-restore:
> ⋯
> /usr/bin/unmkinitramfs /initrd.img "$WORKDIR"
> ⋯
> /lib/systemd/system-shutdown/initramfs-tools:
> ⋯
> /usr/share/init
11 matches
Mail list logo
