On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 09:29:10PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> In buster, the metapackages are still built from linux-latest. This
> has a fake build-dependency on linux-headers--all to ensure it
> waits for linux to be built, but it doesn't have any such relation to
> linux-signed-*.
Ah, damn.
On Sat, 2022-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 06:45:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This will resolve itself automatically once the signed packages are
> > available as well (they are in progress of beeing dealt with but needs
> > a manual inter
On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 06:45:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This will resolve itself automatically once the signed packages are
> available as well (they are in progress of beeing dealt with but needs
> a manual interaction of ftp-masters).
Looks like we need to backport the chan
The suite "oldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads.
Mapping oldstable-security to oldstable-proposed-updates.
binary:acpi-modules-4.19.0-22-686-di is NEW.
binary:acpi-modules-4.19.0-22-686-pae-di is NEW.
binary:ata-modules-4.19.0-22-686-di is NEW.
binary:ata-modules-4.19.0-22
The suite "oldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads.
Mapping oldstable-security to oldstable-proposed-updates.
binary:ata-modules-4.19.0-22-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:btrfs-modules-4.19.0-22-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:cdrom-core-modules-4.19.0-22-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:compress-mod
The suite "oldstable-proposed-updates" does not accept source uploads.
Mapping oldstable-security to oldstable-proposed-updates.
binary:acpi-modules-4.19.0-22-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:ata-modules-4.19.0-22-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:btrfs-modules-4.19.0-22-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:cdrom-core-modules
For reference, I'm seeing the same error messages (but only 4 of them)
on an ASUS Z87-PRO (UEFI secure boot enabled) with current Debian
testing (starting with 5.19.6-1, but also with 5.19.11-1).
The best explanation I could find is a post in a Lenovo forum
https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source linux
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux'
Limit currently set to 'source':'linux'
> tags 1016092 + pending
Bug #1016092 [src:linux] please enable CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Hi Marco,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Hello kernel team, can I get some feedback?
> Are there major reasons why it is not right to build more drivers?
Enabled both CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT3x and CONFIG_SENSORS_SHT4x for the
next upload to experimental, but though I h
9 matches
Mail list logo