Bug#1007144: linux-image-cloud-amd64: Network doesn't come up on AWS Xen-based EC2 instances (ex c4.large)

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:21:23AM +, Reilly Brogan wrote: > Package: linux-image-cloud-amd64 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > We recently noticed that instances using linux-image-5.10.0-11-amd64 and > newer and using Xen-based EC2 instances (su

Processed: Re: Bug#1007144: linux-image-cloud-amd64: Network doesn't come up on AWS Xen-based EC2 instances (ex c4.large)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #1007144 [src:linux] linux-image-cloud-amd64: Network doesn't come up on AWS Xen-based EC2 instances (ex c4.large) Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1007144: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007144 Debian Bug Tracking System Contac

Processed: reassign 1007144 to src:linux

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1007144 src:linux Bug #1007144 [linux-image-cloud-amd64] linux-image-cloud-amd64: Network doesn't come up on AWS Xen-based EC2 instances (ex c4.large) Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-cloud-amd64' to 'src:linux'. Ignoring request

Bug#849487: marked as done (/sbin/umount.nfs4: error while loading shared libraries:)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Mar 2022 02:26:47 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: /sbin/umount.nfs4: error while loading shared libraries: has caused the Debian Bug report #849487, regarding /sbin/umount.nfs4: error while loading shared libraries: to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#980284: marked as done (linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64: InfraRed receiving timeout, remote control button pushes duplicated)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:29:53 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#980284: Update from original submitter has caused the Debian Bug report #980284, regarding linux-image-5.10.0-1-amd64: InfraRed receiving timeout, remote control button pushes duplicated to be marked as do

Uploading linux (5.16.14-1)

Hi I would like to upload linux version 5.16.14-1 to unstable tomorrow. It imports 5.16.13, 5.16.14 including several CVE fixes (CVE-2022-0742, CVE-2022-23036, CVE-2022-23037, CVE-2022-23038, CVE-2022-23039, CVE-2022-23040, CVE-2022-23041, CVE-2022-23042, CVE-2022-23960, CVE-2022-24958). An ABI b

Upcoming oldstable point release (10.12)

Hi, The next point release for "buster" (10.12) is scheduled for Saturday, March 26th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Upcoming stable point release (11.3)

Hi, The next point release for "bullseye" (11.3) is scheduled for Saturday, March 26th. Processing of new uploads into bullseye-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: Dependencies of linux-headers- packages

Hi Felix, On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:33:22AM +, Moessbauer, Felix wrote: > In general I agree, but here the situation is a bit different: > The dependency to the host compiler (e.g. arm64) is too narrow. Wrong. It certainly is not and beyond that, this aspect is not weakened. It still require

linux_5.17~rc8-1~exp1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental, experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:04:37 +0100 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 5.17~rc8-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso Changes: linux (

RE: Dependencies of linux-headers- packages

Hi Helmut, > From: Helmut Grohne > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 2:49 PM > > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 02:13:34PM +, Moessbauer, Felix wrote: > > Many thanks for the patch. > > I just (manually) backported that to Debian bullseye, tested it for arm64 > > and it > worked like a charm.