Hi Frederic,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:27:12AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:05:02PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> > Am Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:04:35 +0200
> > schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> >
> > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:05:02PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:04:35 +0200
> schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso :
>
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Georg Müller wrote:
> > > > But for other configurations it is worse:
> > > >
Your message dated Fri, 12 Nov 2021 23:23:15 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#998716: linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size
has grown a lot compared to 5.8/5.10 releases
has caused the Debian Bug report #998716,
regarding linux-image-5.14.0-2-amd64: The package size has grown
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 998379 wnpp
Bug #998379 [linux-image-5.14.0-4-amd64] RFP: numworks.js -- Utility classes to
interact with a Numworks calculator using WebUSB
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-5.14.0-4-amd64' to 'wnpp'.
No longer marked as found in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 982956 995927
Bug #982956 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-14-686-pae: task blocked for more
Bug #995927 [src:linux] linux-image-amd64: since kernel 5.9 module e100 causes
system-wide problems after suspend
Set Bug forwarded-to-address t
Em Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:34:33PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> Hi,
> Debian currently tries to match the Linux perf tool to the version of
> the kernel that it is being run upon. Reaching out to Ben Hutchings,
> he explained to me that this was done back in 2010 due to kernel and
> Linux perf i
On 12/11/2021 13:34, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hey Mickaël, kernel team,
>
> On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 12:23 +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> -
>> CONFIG_LSM="lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack
>> ,to
>> moyo"
>> +CONFIG_LSM="landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,int
On 12/11/2021 13:45, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Control: tag -1 wontfix
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:23:13PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>> The Landlock security feature is built in Debian kernel since
>> 5.13.12-1~exp1 which is great! However, it is not enough to enable the
>> CONFIG_SECURITY_L
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 wontfix
Bug #999551 [src:linux] Support Landlock by default in Debian kernels
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
999551: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999551
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:23:13PM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> The Landlock security feature is built in Debian kernel since
> 5.13.12-1~exp1 which is great! However, it is not enough to enable the
> CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK option as described in the related help. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey Mickaël, kernel team,
On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 12:23 +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> -
> CONFIG_LSM="lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack
> ,to
> moyo"
> +CONFIG_LSM="landlock,lockdown,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity,app
I have the exact same WD SN720 drive and the same problem. The only
thing I can add is that booting with pci=nomsi only stops the system
booting.
Thanks,
Ed
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.14.16-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: landl...@lists.linux.dev
Hi,
The Landlock security feature is built in Debian kernel since
5.13.12-1~exp1 which is great! However, it is not enough to enable the
CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK option as described in the r
13 matches
Mail list logo
