Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On 9/19/2021 9:30 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: On 9/19/2021 4:53 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 03:54:01PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: On 9/19/2021 1:29 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: Have you tried memory ballooning with PVH or HVM domains? That combination has been relia

Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On 9/19/2021 4:53 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 03:54:01PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: On 9/19/2021 1:29 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: Have you tried memory ballooning with PVH or HVM domains? That combination has been reliably crashing Xen for me for a while. Apparently

Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > xen hypervisor version: 4.14.2+25-gb6a8c4f72d-2, amd64 > > linux kernel version: 5.10.46-4 (the current amd64 kernel > for bullseye) > > Boot system: EFI, not using secure boot, booting xen > hypervisor and dom0 bullseye with gru

Bug#994721: linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-amd64: Freeze on i915 Broxton with linux >=5.7 and old mesa; not prevented by intel_iommu=intgpu_off

Details to follow tomorrow (bisected already, how to reproduce)

Bug#994721: linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.8-amd64: Freeze on i915 Broxton with linux >=5.7 and old mesa; not prevented by intel_iommu=intgpu_off

Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.46-4~bpo10+1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was th

Bug#994719: linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: Kernel oops

Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.46-4 Severity: important Kernal oops: [ 4895.690309] FAT-fs (sdd1): Directory bread(block 23326848) failed [ 4895.690312] FAT-fs (sdd1): Directory bread(block 23326849) failed [ 4895.690314] FAT-fs (sdd1): Directory bread(block 23326850) failed [ 4895.690315] FAT-f

Re: Error compiling a module

I have not received any response on this problem El mié, 15 sept 2021 a las 16:46, Alexander Villalba (< alexvillalb...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Dear Friends!: > > I've been compiling this code: > https://github.com/bsalunke/SysCallInterceptModule > and when executing make or ./compile.sh, it's re

Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On 9/19/2021 1:29 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: I noticed this bug on bullseye ever since I have been running bullseye as a dom0, but my testing indicates there is no problem with src:linux but the problem appeared in src:xen with t

Bug#994727: reportbug: Hang at boot (pre-X) with [drm] CPU Pipe A FIFO underrun [workaround included]

Package: src:linux Version: 5.10.46-4 Severity: critical Hello, After upgrading this laptop from buster to bullseye, I started to have issues. The laptop uses a LUKS root, so it pauses before loading X to prompt for a password. Therefore I know this problem is not just X. Immediately after put

Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On 9/19/2021 10:56 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 13:29:12 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:47:12PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > An experiment lead to a potential alter

Bug#991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

Adding pkg-xen-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org into the loop. Chuck Zmudzinski replied to the bug and later replied to his own reply. To give full context, I've added the original reply in full and Chuck's reply to that (as it only quoted part of the context there). On zondag 19 september 2021 07

Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On 9/19/2021 1:05 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: Hello Elliott and Salvatore, I noticed this bug on bullseye ever since I have been running bullseye as a dom0, but my testing indicates there is no problem with src:linux but the problem appeared in src:xen with the 4.14 version of xen on bullseye.

Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 13:29:12 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:47:12PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > > An experiment lead to a potential alternative explanation for #991967. > > > The

linux_5.14.6-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 10:49:04 +0200 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 5.14.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso Changes: linux (5.14.6-2) u

linux_5.14.6-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:58:49 +0200 Source: linux Architecture: source Version: 5.14.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso Closes: 929528 944518 992988

Processing of linux_5.14.6-2_source.changes

linux_5.14.6-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux_5.14.6-2.dsc linux_5.14.6-2.debian.tar.xz linux_5.14.6-2_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#991967: #991967: Simply ACPI powerdown/reset issue?

On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 13:29:12 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Elliott, > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:47:12PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > > An experiment lead to a potential alternative explanation for #991967. > > The issue may be ACPI (non-UEFI) powerdown/reset was broken at > > 4.1

Bug#993948: marked as done (kernel/amd64: system hang on HPE ProLiant BL460c Gen9)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#993948: fixed in linux 5.14.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #993948, regarding kernel/amd64: system hang on HPE ProLiant BL460c Gen9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#993000: marked as done (linux: please enable CONFIG_VFIO_FSL_MC on arm64)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#993000: fixed in linux 5.14.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #993000, regarding linux: please enable CONFIG_VFIO_FSL_MC on arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#992988: marked as done (linux: please enable CONFIG_FSL_MC_UAPI_SUPPORT on arm64)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992988: fixed in linux 5.14.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #992988, regarding linux: please enable CONFIG_FSL_MC_UAPI_SUPPORT on arm64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#994215: marked as done (Enable CONFIG_FSL_MC_UAPI_SUPPORT)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#992988: fixed in linux 5.14.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #992988, regarding Enable CONFIG_FSL_MC_UAPI_SUPPORT to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#944518: marked as done (linux-image-4.19.0-6-armmp: please enable CONFIG_INPUT_TPS65218_PWRBUTTON)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#944518: fixed in linux 5.14.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #944518, regarding linux-image-4.19.0-6-armmp: please enable CONFIG_INPUT_TPS65218_PWRBUTTON to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#929528: marked as done ([arm64] Enable support for SCPI sensors)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2021 09:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#929528: fixed in linux 5.14.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #929528, regarding [arm64] Enable support for SCPI sensors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.